W
WingedHussar
Guest
Seeing as we were talking about national problems I thought the sort of duty I was referring to was obvious.
But if fewer women have children, you’re going to need more women than you would otherwise.Except that no woman has the duty to reproduce according to feminism so that particular capability is not relevant.
Exceptions that prove the rule as discussed earlier.Then let’s cease any references to a “duty to reproduce.” There are too many exceptions.
Birthrates have gone down a lot globally, too.Or we just use immigration and cloning and never bother women again with tiresome duties towards the nation or the family.
Granted, there are also correlations between birth rate and infant mortality. As I recall, many of the times in history where women routinely had lots and lots of kids were ones where many children didn’t survive to adulthood. They also were ones where kids started pitching in much earlier than they did now - so having lots of kids was economically incentivized rather than a net drain.Birthrates have gone down a lot globally, too.
…at least.versus kids who will be costing money realistically until their early 20’s.
Out of curiosity, where is your family from? You’re making a big point of it not being America. So, from where?As a first generation American…
In America, me being the first generation…
How’s that working out for you? What, specifically, are you doing with the time you’d otherwise be spending in college, that you feel is actively preparing you “to be a wife and mother”?As someone who dropped out of college partially due to feeling as though I was not being prepared to be a wife and mother, I feel especially called to the sacrament of marriage
Good point, prior to birth control there was more or less a biological limit to feminism. Men and women enjoy having sex and that results in pregnancy. Before easy “safe” abortions and female birth control this usually entailed dropping out of the workforce and staying home to raise a child. With the biology subverted, that opened the door for the culture to change, which affected the politics and finally the economics.Birth control, too, of course
At the same time, a lot of girls and women throughout Christian history have chosen to remain in the single state for their entire lives–some due to piety and probably some because they were not enthused by what they had seen of the duties and dangers of wifehood and motherhood.Good point, prior to birth control there was more or less a biological limit to feminism. Men and women enjoy having sex and that results in pregnancy. Before easy “safe” abortions and female birth control this usually entailed dropping out of the workforce and staying home to raise a child. With the biology subverted, that opened the door for the culture to change, which affected the politics and finally the economics.