Genesis 3:15 as a Virgin Birth (and Marian) Prophesy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Belloc_Fan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Belloc_Fan

Guest
*I’m trying to write a collection of homilies. This one is for the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, and the first reading is Genesis 3:15. Will you read it over, and let me know what you think? Constructive criticism would be wonderful.
*

There’s a verse in today’s reading which I’d like to draw your attention to. It’s Genesis 3:15, where God is talking to the serpent. Here’s what He says, in part: “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.” Let’s look at who the cast of characters are:

• The serpent is the devil. This has always been the traditional understanding, and the verse supports this. The end of 3:15 says that her seed will bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel. So the serpent will outlive Adam and Eve – this is obviously more than a reference to a mere snake.

• The seed of the woman is Christ. This verse is one of the earliest Christological prophesies, and it’s a prophesy of the Virgin Birth. Only one Man through all of history has a biological Mother and no biological father, and that Man is Jesus Christ, on account of the miracle of the Virgin Birth. And in the writings of Genesis, inspired by the Holy Spirit, we see the first hint of this. That’s why we find this strange concept, the seed of a woman. In Judaism, lineage is normally measured backwards through the father – look at St. Matthew’s and St. Luke’s lineage. And particularly, this term zera’ [zeh’-rah], or seed, can have some pretty masculine connotations. Genesis 38:8 uses the term to mean offspring, but in the very next verse, we’re told that Onan “spilled his seed on the ground,” and it’s the verse same word.

o This term offers an insight into how closely the Old Testament Jews tied sexuality and procreation together. Onan is destroying the future generations God desired, and God kills him as a result. The ancient Jewish, and modern Catholic, views on issues as divergent as birth control, masturbation, abortion, deviant sexuality, and all of the other lapses from God’s plan for sexuality can find their roots, in one way or another, to this concept.
Here, though, it’s the seed of Eve. Remember, Adam and Eve are both standing there, yet God says the seed of Eve. So why would He choose to say the seed of Eve? It’s because He’s talking about His own Son. Jesus is the offspring of a woman, Mary, but not the offspring of a man. So what we have here is probably the first Christological prophesy, and definitely the first prophesy of the Virgin Birth, and we’re not even out of Eden yet.

• God is punishing Adam and Eve. They ate of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. With knowledge that what you’re doing is wrong, you’re accountable for those wrong actions. Everyone, regardless of faith, understands this. You can’t punish a baby for misbehaving, it doesn’t know any better. But adults do know better. Elsewhere, in Luke 12:47-48, Christ warns us, “That servant who knew his master’s will but did not make preparations nor act in accord with his will shall be beaten severely; and the servant who was ignorant of his master’s will but acted in a way deserving of a severe beating shall be beaten only lightly.” So He’s saying that He considers things like ignorance. A person who has no idea what God desires can hardly be held accountable for following His Will, but those of us who are here, who have perpetual access to the word of God, we’re going to be accountable.

• But note that in the midst of punishing them, God is providing the escape hatch. He’s saying, ‘now, you’re going to be accountable for what you do,’ but He knows we’ll all fall short – Romans 3:23 tells us that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” So here’s the escape hatch: a Woman will have a Child who is hated by the devil. He will bruise His heel, he’ll cause problems, but Her Offspring will strike the devil’s head. And sure enough, that’s just what happened. Because of the presence of sin in the world, the devil was allowed to torment and torture Christ, even to the point of death on a Cross. But none of that was more than a flesh wound, a bruised heel. Christ won out, and has delivered the crippling blow to the devil’s hold on the world. With the Passion and Resurrection of Christ, the escape hatch has been sprung. St. Paul calls Christ “the last Adam” in 1 Corinthians 15, because we no longer have to be bound by this curse of sin. Christ has freed us from this trap.

• So in a special, biological sense, the offspring of the woman is Christ. He is literally Mary’s Son, and He is literally the Son of God. But the term seed of the woman is gender-neutral in the original Hebrew, and this is important, because while it refers to Christ primarily, it refers to all of His Church as well. Romans 16:20 promises that “The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet.” So using our feet, God will deliver mortal blows to the devil’s grip of sin in the world. And that’s what happens when you come to Christ, when you reject Satan, and all his empty works, and all his empty promises. You say no where Adam and Eve said yes. And through the power of God, you foil the devil’s plan.
 
(cont.)

• So who is the woman? Well, the prophesy is about the Virgin Birth, so it’s the Virgin, of course. We know that Mary is the Virgin Mother of Christ from the Gospels. But what about the Church? We know that the seed of the woman applies to the whole Church, to all the saved, so what about that? Well, the answer to that comes in the Book of Revelation. The last line of Revelation 11 says that God’s temple in Heaven opened, and the Ark of the Covenant appeared. Then John the Revelator proceeds to describe in Revelation 12:1 “a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head.” This woman is at war with a dragon, and in 12:5, the woman gives birth “to a son, a male child, who will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.” So there we have the serpent, the Woman, and the Child again; and it’s pretty clear again that this is the devil, Mary, and Jesus. Revelation 12:13-16 talks about how the devil wishes to destroy the woman, but can’t, because She is protected; so in Revelation 12:17 it says, “Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to make war against the rest of her offspring—those who obey God’s commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus.” So since the devil can’t get to Mary, because Mary was conceived and remained without sin, he goes after the rest of her offspring, the Church.

• Let me plug that back in and reword it slightly: God is telling the devil, “I will put enmity between you and Mary, and between your seed and her seed; her seed shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise her seed’s heel.”

o Is this prophesy true of Christ? Of course it is. We know He beat the forces of evil, the devil and his minions. In 1 Corinthians 15:54, St. Paul quotes Isaiah 25:8, “Death has been swallowed up in victory.” That’s the message of the Cross.

o Is this prophesy true of the Church? It is, and it’s true for every one of us here today. The devil will do his worst to you, but he cannot win, so long as you are an offspring of the Church, a child of Mary. And how can you tell if you’re a child of Mary? Revelation 12:17 says it’s if you’re one of “those who obey God’s commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus.”

Alright, that’s what I’ve got. I welcome criticism both of content (“I think you’re wrong about x point”) and form (“this is written cheesily, unclearly, etc.”). Thanks in advance! 👍
 
From the Haydock Bible Commentary

Ver. 15. She shall crush. Ipsa, the woman: so divers of the fathers read this place, conformably to the Latin: others read it ipsum, viz. the seed. The sense is the same: for it is by her seed, Jesus Christ, that the woman crushes the serpent’s head. (Challoner) — The Hebrew text, as Bellarmine observes, is ambiguous: He mentions one copy which had ipsa instead of ipsum; and so it is even printed in the Hebrew interlineary edition, 1572, by Plantin, under the inspection of Boderianus. Whether the Jewish editions ought to have more weight with Christians, or whether all the other manuscripts conspire against this reading, let others inquire. The fathers who have cited the old Italic version, taken from the Septuagint agree with the Vulgate, which is followed by almost all the Latins; and hence we may argue with probability, that the Septuagint and the Hebrew formerly acknowledged ipsa, which now moves the indignation of Protestants so much, as if we intended by it to give any divine honour to the blessed Virgin. We believe, however, with St. Epiphanius, that “it is no less criminal to vilify the holy Virgin, than to glorify her above measure.” We know that all the power of the mother of God is derived from the merits of her Son. We are no otherwise concerned about the retaining of ipsa, she, in this place, that in as much as we have yet no certain reason to suspect its being genuine. As some words have been corrected in the Vulgate since the Council of Trent by Sixtus V. and others, by Clement VIII. so, if, upon stricter search, it be found that it, and not she, is the true reading, we shall not hesitate to admit the correction: but we must wait in the mean time respectfully, till our superiors determine. (Haydock) Kemnitzius certainly advanced a step too far, when he said that all the ancient fathers read ipsum. Victor, Avitus, St. Augustine, St. Gregory, &c. mentioned in the Douay Bible, will convict him of falsehood. Christ crushed the serpent’s head by his death, suffering himself to be wounded in the heel. His blessed mother crushed him likewise, by her co-operation in the mystery of the Incarnation; and by rejecting, with horror, the very first suggestions of the enemy, to commit even the smallest sin. (St. Bernard, ser. 2, on Missus est.) “We crush,” says St. Gregory, Mor. 1. 38, “the serpent’s head, when we extirpate from our heart the beginnings of temptation, and then he lays snares for our heel, because he opposes the end of a good action with greater craft and power.” The serpent may hiss and threaten; he cannot hurt, if we resist him. (Haydock)
 
From the Haydock Bible Commentary

Ver. 15. She shall crush. Ipsa, the woman: so divers of the fathers read this place, conformably to the Latin: others read it ipsum, viz. the seed. The sense is the same: for it is by her seed, Jesus Christ, that the woman crushes the serpent’s head. (Challoner) — The Hebrew text, as Bellarmine observes, is ambiguous: He mentions one copy which had ipsa instead of ipsum; and so it is even printed in the Hebrew interlineary edition, 1572, by Plantin, under the inspection of Boderianus. Whether the Jewish editions ought to have more weight with Christians, or whether all the other manuscripts conspire against this reading, let others inquire. The fathers who have cited the old Italic version, taken from the Septuagint agree with the Vulgate, which is followed by almost all the Latins; and hence we may argue with probability, that the Septuagint and the Hebrew formerly acknowledged ipsa, which now moves the indignation of Protestants so much, as if we intended by it to give any divine honour to the blessed Virgin. We believe, however, with St. Epiphanius, that “it is no less criminal to vilify the holy Virgin, than to glorify her above measure.” We know that all the power of the mother of God is derived from the merits of her Son. We are no otherwise concerned about the retaining of ipsa, she, in this place, that in as much as we have yet no certain reason to suspect its being genuine. As some words have been corrected in the Vulgate since the Council of Trent by Sixtus V. and others, by Clement VIII. so, if, upon stricter search, it be found that it, and not she, is the true reading, we shall not hesitate to admit the correction: but we must wait in the mean time respectfully, till our superiors determine. (Haydock) Kemnitzius certainly advanced a step too far, when he said that all the ancient fathers read ipsum. Victor, Avitus, St. Augustine, St. Gregory, &c. mentioned in the Douay Bible, will convict him of falsehood. Christ crushed the serpent’s head by his death, suffering himself to be wounded in the heel. His blessed mother crushed him likewise, by her co-operation in the mystery of the Incarnation; and by rejecting, with horror, the very first suggestions of the enemy, to commit even the smallest sin. (St. Bernard, ser. 2, on Missus est.) “We crush,” says St. Gregory, Mor. 1. 38, “the serpent’s head, when we extirpate from our heart the beginnings of temptation, and then he lays snares for our heel, because he opposes the end of a good action with greater craft and power.” The serpent may hiss and threaten; he cannot hurt, if we resist him. (Haydock)
Yeah, I read something explaining how the Hebrew term we translate “He” is actually gender-neutral, and can be a singular or plural. So it could be Mary, Christ, or the Church. It’s been a problem for translators, but this commentary is right that probably all three interpretations are theologically correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top