Genesis...ages...several hundred years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LucyK
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

LucyK

Guest
My children and I are reading through the “90 day reading plan” from Great Adventure. They were suprised to learn that Adam and Methuselah and others lived 900+ years. They wondered if this was true. I mumbled something about not knowing whether they measured time the same way as we do… and read the rest of the story.

Help?
 
My children and I are reading through the “90 day reading plan” from Great Adventure. They were suprised to learn that Adam and Methuselah and others lived 900+ years. They wondered if this was true. I mumbled something about not knowing whether they measured time the same way as we do… and read the rest of the story.

Help?
I believe they lived 900 or more years.
 
Because of original sin and eating from the tree of life, man’s bodies began to deteriate. It was part of the punishment. Later, after Methusulah, you will read about God further punishing man by limiting his years to 120. The further man got from the innocent and pure way that God created him, the more his body and soul became corrupted.
 
My children and I are reading through the “90 day reading plan” from Great Adventure. They were suprised to learn that Adam and Methuselah and others lived 900+ years. They wondered if this was true. I mumbled something about not knowing whether they measured time the same way as we do… and read the rest of the story.

Help?
Long life was considered a blessing from God. Their living this long, according to the Bible, is intended to show they were blessed by God.

The actual years of their lives are secondary (they may or may not have in fact lived that many years as reckoned by our calendars, and Catholics are free to believe they lived that long in fact or that those numbers are symbolic).
 
You should teach them young to have the Faith of our Fathers…

St. Augustine: "Wherefore no one who considerately weighs facts will doubt that Cain might have built a city, and that a large one, when it is observed how prolonged were the lives of men, unless perhaps some sceptic take exception to this very length of years which our authors ascribe to the antediluvians and deny that this is credible… But the length of an antediluvian’s life cannot now be proved by any such monumental evidence. But we are not on this account to withhold our faith from the sacred history, whose statements of past fact we are the more inexcusable in discrediting, as we see the accuracy of its prediction of what was future…

For they are by no means to be listened to who suppose that in those times years were differently reckoned, and were so short that one of our years may be supposed to be equal to ten of theirs. So that they say, when we read or hear that some man lived 900 years, we should understand ninety, ten of those years making but one of ours, and ten of ours equalling 100 of theirs…

By these plausible arguments certain persons, with no desire to weaken the credit of this sacred history, but rather to facilitate belief in it by removing the difficulty of such incredible longevity, have been themselves persuaded, and think they act wisely in persuading others, that in these days the year was so brief that ten of their years equal but one of ours, while ten of ours equal 100 of theirs. But there is the plainest evidence to show that this is quite false…

It is proved by this, that Scripture states that the flood occurred in the six hundredth year of Noah’s life. But why in the same place is it also written, “The waters of the flood were upon the earth in the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the twenty-seventh day of the month,” if that very brief year (of which it took ten to make one of ours) consisted of thirty-six days? For so scant a year, if the ancient usage dignified it with the name of year, either has not months, or this month must be three days, so that it may have twelve of them… Who can away with such foolishness and absurdity? Far be this error from us—an error which seeks to build up our faith in the divine Scriptures on false conjecture only to demolish our faith at another point. It is plain that the day then was what it now is, a space of four-and-twenty hours, determined by the lapse of day and night; the month then equal to the month now, which is defined by the rise and completion of one moon; the year then equal to the year now, which is completed by twelve lunar months, with the addition of five days and a fourth to adjust it with the course of the sun. It was a year of this length which was reckoned the six hundredth of Noah’s life, and in the second month, the twenty-seventh day of the month, the flood began—a flood which, as is recorded, was caused by heavy rains continuing for forty days, which days had not only two hours and a little more, but four-and-twenty hours, completing a night and a day. And consequently those antediluvians lived more than 900 years, which were years as long as those which afterwards Abraham lived 175 of, and after him his son Isaac 180, and his son Jacob nearly 150, and some time after, Moses 120, and men now seventy or eighty, or not much longer, of which years it is said, “their strength is labor and sorrow.”" (The City of God, XV, 9-14)
 
It s common in the age before writing and in the cultural milieu of many nations to ascribe great ages to the great kings and sages of the past.Some of them thousands of year. Jain prophets of India were thought to have lived millions of years.In reading OT I suggest a book called “Reading The Old Testament” by Lawrence Boadt. It is a standard text in many seminaries and it is considered the quintessential user friendly writing on understanding what the OT is saying in the socio-cultural terms of the time.
Good reading!
 
Because of original sin and eating from the tree of life, man’s bodies began to deteriate. It was part of the punishment. Later, after Methusulah, you will read about God further punishing man by limiting his years to 120. The further man got from the innocent and pure way that God created him, the more his body and soul became corrupted.
Augustine explains that the reference to limiting man’s ‘days’ (not age) to 120 didn’t mean the lifespan of each individual man. Terah, Abraham’s father, lived to over 200, for example, if memory serves.

Rather the reference to 120 years meant that the flood - the destruction of mankind - happened 120 years after God spoke those words to Noah, so mankind’s days were numbered in that sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top