Well, we’re all sinners, some just appear worse than others. Bernard Nathansen was an abortionist, responsible for the direct murder of countless unborn children, and the indirect murder of even more, as he was a staunch promoter of “abortion rights”. He repented of his sins, and is now a Catholic (I don’t know the exact details of his conversion. I think he repented of the abortions first, then found Catholicism later, but I could be wrong). I have no reason to doubt the sincerity of his repentence and conversion, which I can only assume is as profound as my own (I was never an abortionist, but in my “heathen” days, I believe I did break every one of the 10 commandments, as well as The Greatest Commandment given us by Christ himself). I don’t see how Kang Kheck leu could be any different. Since his identity as a killer wasn’t known until after he converted, I don’t see that he became a Christian to somehow “escape justice”. And if we started “expelling” people from Christianity for their past sins that we have no reason to believe they haven’t repented of, then we’re going against Christ himself, who came “to call not the righteous but sinners”. The only unforgivable sin is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, which has been explained to me as being the belief that we cannot, be forgiven, that our sins are greater than God’s mercy. So yes, I would say that Kang has just as good of shot at heaven as I do, after going through purgatory, which may or may not be more painful than the rest of our journeys there, only God knows that.
In Christ,
Ellen