X
Xantippe
Guest
Here’s another possible translation of “I want a submissive wife”:
“I want to get my way even when it’s going to hurt my family.”
“I want to get my way even when it’s going to hurt my family.”
I doubt most traditionalist men want a free pass to actually HURT their families.Here’s another possible translation of “I want a submissive wife”:
“I want to get my way even when it’s going to hurt my family.”
Likewise, recall that immediately following the exhortation for wives to be subordinate to their husbands comes verse 25, exhortingBe subordinate to one another out of reverence for Christ.
So, you know: Don’t forget to love your wife enough that you willHusbands, love your wives, even as Christ loved the church and handed himself over for her
die
Thanks, tee, for being a manly man of God and posting this:twocents:
Don’t forget that immediately before the exhortation for wives to be subordinate to their husbands, Ephesians 5:22, comes verse 21, exhorting
Likewise, recall that immediately following the exhortation for wives to be subordinate to their husbands comes verse 25, exhorting
So, you know: Don’t forget to love your wife enough that you will
for her.Code:die
:twocents:
tee
Whose mother-in-law is still beautiful. :kiss4you:
I’m sure many men would claim they do or would. But apparently, many men don’t think its reasonable to love one’s wife enough to put oneself at risk of divorce. Therefore, better to have a submissive wife who will take whatever you dish at her, as opposed to actually gasp working on your marriage to minimize the risks of divorce. Because most women are selfish and evil, and divorce out of a mere whim or because they are evil adulteresses.:twocents:
So, you know: Don’t forget to love your wife enough that you will
for her.Code:die
There are no guarantees. A laid back mellow woman who does not mind being in the passenger seat may be pushed by an overly dominant and aggressive husband to being on the defensive mode. Sure the likelihood of not being in the divorce court may not be high, for now. Buth then again, people do change.I doubt most traditionalist men want a free pass to actually HURT their families.
However, another translation is: “I don’t want to actually have to spend time and effort building a partnership with my wife. I want a submissive wife who’ll take me as I am, take care of me and give me sex on demand, so I don’t have to actually sacrifice anything.”
Also, considering some comments made by MRA types about how stacked the divorce courts are against men: “If I marry a submissive woman, I don’t have to worry that she’ll divorce me over something petty and put me through hell. I can do whatever I want and know she’ll take it.”
Hmm… you’ve got a point there, though it’s not like women won’t express their wish for a relationship dynamic balanced in their favour, sometimes in quite open words.But women pretty much never explicitly say “I want a submissive husband” and men do say “I want a submissive wife” quite frequently.
Call me a chauvinist, but the first mental association I had after reading the latter was: ‘Isn’t that what modern women tend to think?’ However, yes, they normally won’t spell it out just like that. The conclusion is more or less that each sex deserves the other, so to say. Neither sex is an innocent victim here, at all. The Fall made us both egoists and control freaks.The explicit expectations are quite different. It’s “I want an equal say in our family’s decision making” versus “I want to get my way every single time I really want it.”
I’ll help you: I never equated: ‘I want an equal say in our family’s decision making,’ with: ‘I want to get my way every single time I really want it.’ I only equated tendencies between the two sexes. Each sex is as good or bad as the other.I don’t think those two things are at all equivalent. (Although I agree that there are obviously both men and women that want to get their way every single time.)
The last thing I would want in a family is explicit policies.However, that said, I think you can easily make the argument that a lot of husbands would be getting a much better deal than they’re currently getting if they went for the “equal say” route. Which, I think, is a really good argument for having “equal say” as explicit family policy.
Wow. Just wow.
I started a thread to hear from men, and here we are…
“I want a submissive wife” may mean exactly what all y’all are saying. Or it may mean something completely different. After all, this is all speculation, based on how YOU receive the words being said. And this speculation is based not within a relationship with an actual human being, but with an imaginary man whom you can create in your own minds to be anything you want, or in this case, anything you don’t want.
Let’s turn the tables for a moment.
Suppose a woman said, “I want a man who will love me as Christ loved the Church and laid down His life for her” (Ephesians 5). Would that mean I’m a self-absorbed woman who wants her husband to do and be everything I want, forgiving my constant indiscretions with a simple “I’m sorry” regardless of their severity? Would that mean I expect my husband to give up his own will and glory (not the Beatific Vision as it was with Christ, but the glory of his gifts, his strengths, his masculinity)?
Bashing imaginary men with self-congratulatory remarks is really not the topic of this thread. If you wish to continue with this discussion of whether wives should be submissive to their husbands, could you please start your own thread?
Back on topic if anyone cares to add more. But otherwise, please take YOUR topic someplace else.
God bless you.
Gertie
I find that last one very interesting. I think it’s important when getting to know someone that you see them in a variety of settings with a variety of people. The sort of people someone calls their friends can speak volumes about that person’s character.
Back on topic.
- From a good family
- Lived independently for a few years
- Solid prayer life
- Anti-feminist
- Emotionally stable
- Not materialistic
- Healthy, Attractive and in-shape
- Solid circle of friends who can vouch for her
I actually would be very concerned about a woman like that. I would not be delighted, for instance, to have her as a prospective daughter-in-law.Let’s turn the tables for a moment.
Suppose a woman said, “I want a man who will love me as Christ loved the Church and laid down His life for her” (Ephesians 5). Would that mean I’m a self-absorbed woman who wants her husband to do and be everything I want, forgiving my constant indiscretions with a simple “I’m sorry” regardless of their severity? Would that mean I expect my husband to give up his own will and glory (not the Beatific Vision as it was with Christ, but the glory of his gifts, his strengths, his masculinity)?
Well, I think any group of people living together for longer than 24 hours needs policies.The last thing I would want in a family is explicit policies.
chevalier:![]()
Well, I think any group of people living together for longer than 24 hours needs policies.The last thing I would want in a family is explicit policies.
Here are some examples of policies from our house:
–kids can only eat in the living room with explicit permission
–spouses will spend according to the monthly budget
–everybody over about 2 ought to clean up after himself or herself
–kids will pack their school lunches
you have to date a while to find that out.Someone who does not make a big deal out of things that don’t have to be a big deal.
I copied and pasted from the site allaboutgod.com/role-of-the-wife-in-the-bible.htmhere are the main 3 when chosing a Noble wife.
As wives, we are given these roles, among others:
- **Mentors **- Titus 2:4-5 says, “Then they can train the younger women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no one will malign the word of God.”
- **Witnesses **- 1 Peter 3:1 says, “Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behavior of their wives."
- **Examples **- 1 Timothy 3:11 says, “In the same way, their wives are to be women worthy of respect, not malicious talkers but temperate and trustworthy in everything.”
I’m not married, but I find those to be inspirational.here are the main 3 when chosing a Noble wife.
As wives, we are given these roles, among others:
- **Mentors **- Titus 2:4-5 says, “Then they can train the younger women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no one will malign the word of God.”
- **Witnesses **- 1 Peter 3:1 says, “Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behavior of their wives."
- **Examples **- 1 Timothy 3:11 says, “In the same way, their wives are to be women worthy of respect, not malicious talkers but temperate and trustworthy in everything.”
Agreements and arrangements are okay, as are informal parental instructions, but a ‘policy’ sounds too much like legislation, and I personally don’t think legislating, lawmaking etc. is the way to go in a family; rather, it’s too harsh. This is just to register my thoughts and feelings about the matter, not to bash anyone who manages his family in a different way than I would, if I had one to manage.Well, I think any group of people living together for longer than 24 hours needs policies.
Here are some examples of policies from our house:
–kids can only eat in the living room with explicit permission
–spouses will spend according to the monthly budget
–everybody over about 2 ought to clean up after himself or herself
–kids will pack their school lunches