B
b_justb
Guest
Best question I’ve heard all weekIf the pro-aborts are right and abortion is just a routine surgery with no horrific implications, why is it disorderly conduct to show what is involved?
Best question I’ve heard all weekIf the pro-aborts are right and abortion is just a routine surgery with no horrific implications, why is it disorderly conduct to show what is involved?
I say sex education is unrelated because a photo of an aborted baby in no way instructs a 3 year old about sex. If you as a parent choose to bring up the subject of sex with your three year old, that is entirely your call.And if you think that the sex education issue is off topic, then perhaps you can explain why the ananlogy fails. I do not put my rights first, I am merely stating that this man’s rights are not unlimited. They end where the rights of others begin.
Incorrect, one is wrong the other isn’t. Do you believe what you are typing?You just expalined why the parallel applies. Because one group (Planned Parenthood or Anti-abortion activists) decides the need for this type of education is so important, no one should have the freedom to avoid it. It should be forced upon children.
it has its differences and similarities. the point is, both are disturbing images of human body parts. its not for the very young.Not even close. If you think it is same thing you have issues.
I’m lovin it too. Funny also how it always does generate so much outrage.I for one am tickled pink that people are outraged by these pictures. Its about time. i think they should park one of these trucks by every polling place in country next November and perhaps we can bring this noutrage to an end.
BTW-i am always amused on how, on so many issues, people try to hide behind their children.
One is disturbing because it brings to light the horror of abortion, it acconmplishes something good, something that needs to be done. The other is disturbing for the sake of bieng disturbing. It’s senseless.it has its differences and similarities. the point is, both are disturbing images of human body parts. its not for the very young.
One is disturbing because it brings to light the horror of abortion, it acconmplishes something good, something that needs to be done. The other is disturbing for the sake of bieng disturbing. It’s senseless.
What harms children more: abortion or the education of what abortin really is?
Because that truck was not preceeded with the following words:If the pro-aborts are right and abortion is just a routine surgery with no horrific implications, why is it disorderly conduct to show what is involved?
Sorry, but it is not a scene of violence, but a photo of the aftermath of violence.Because that truck was not preceeded with the following words:
“The following subject matter contains scenes of gore & violence. Viewer discretion is adviced”
or something like that.![]()
What harms the living children?What harms children more: abortion or the education of what abortin really is?
Sure does harm the living children. In fact it kills them.What harms the living children?
Abortion: No. Kids in kindergarten dont give a damn about it.
Based on the parents reaction to them.Abortion Education: Depends on how you do it. That truck might be disturbing to young minds.
we were discussing kids in kindergarten and early grade school. thats the issue here.Sure does harm the living children. In fact it kills them.
Actually the issue is the slaughter of children in the womb by the tens of millions due to ignorance of the truth. Others are trying to make it about kindergarten children.we were discussing kids in kindergarten and early grade school. thats the issue here.
Actually that issue is for another thread. This thread is about how the truck driver is guilty of vulgarity & obscenity.Actually the issue is the slaughter of children in the womb by the tens of millions due to ignorance of the truth. Others are trying to make it about kindergarten children.
No, it has been about how he was arrested and wrongfully charged. We are now debating the value of education using graphic images.Actually that issue is for another thread. This thread is about how the truck driver is guilty of vulgarity & obscenity.
actually its about whether or not he is guilty of vulgarity & obscenity.No, it has been about how he was arrested and wrongfully charged. We are now debating the value of education using graphic images.
In a country where a Doctor can legally tear a small child to pieces as long as he/she is still in the womb, it’s far from obscene or vulgar to let people know about it.actually its about whether or not he is guilty of vulgarity & obscenity.
i say he is guilty because there was no preceeding “…viewer discretion is adviced”
No, the kindergarten kids are used, as has been used by several other posters in past threads, as a cover for justifying their weak arguments for censorship. The topic of this thread however started with discussion of how a truck driver was wrongfully arrested for doing something to help stop abortion. Not to say topics don’t expound to other areas led on by the direction of the discussion.we were discussing kids in kindergarten and early grade school. thats the issue here.
depends on how you educate the public.In a country where a Doctor can legally tear a small child to pieces as long as he/she is still in the womb, it’s far from obscene or vulgar to let people know about it.