B
Bananas
Guest
Please tell me how this is blackmail when I am not using it to get her to change her mind?That is blackmail.
Please tell me how this is blackmail when I am not using it to get her to change her mind?That is blackmail.
Of course you are! You say the only reason you told her you wanted her to quit was because if you didn’t and she got ill, you would feel like physically harming yourselves. That is shutting down the conversation via guilt-tripping and blackmail because what can she say to that? That she doesn’t care? Then you would say she was ungrateful and unfeeling. If she said she wouldn’t want you to feel that way? Then you would say the only thing for her to do would be to quit.Please tell me how this is blackmail when I am not using it to get her to change her mind?
Then what was your objective?Please tell me how this is blackmail when I am not using it to get her to change her mind?
Funny thing is that I’ve worked outside for years and never had a tick on me! Long pants, 8” boots, and crew socks. :man_shrugging:t2:Do you not let your kids play outside in nature because ticks with Lyme disease exist?
I do, too. But I’m scared to death that she’s for real. The damage she’s doing to those children!OP, I really hope you are trolling, because you seem hell-bent on taking away everything your daughters enjoy.
No! When she said she was angry with her father and me for telling her there was a health risk, I told her that we struggled with saying anything at all because we know she loves it but would be heartbroken to the point of wanting to harm ourselves if she got ill and we knew we didn’t say anything.You say the only reason you told her you wanted her to quit was because if you didn’t and she got ill, you would feel like physically harming yourselves.
That’s wonderful that they were strong enough to deal with it. If bananas is for real, I pray her children are strong, too.Well, in the case of the family I knew, it wasn’t irreparable damage. The kids retaliated appropriately and they butted heads. Out of the three kids, one finished college, one drives truck, and one details trucks.
To illustrate that we are concerned about her and want her to be safe. Once again, I said this in response to her being angry with her father and me for merely warning her there was a risk (not for forbidding her).Then what was your objective?
No, because your insinuation would have been firmly on hers.In other words, if she got ill when she carried on after we warned her, at least we would not have it on our consciences that we did not warn her
Your purpose in “warning” her (of a completely exaggerated risk) was to try to coerce her into stopping her service as an EMHC. Then when she got angry at your attempts to coerce and manipulate her, you decided this was how you would justify your action.To illustrate that we are concerned about her and want her to be safe. Once again, I said this in response to her being angry with her father and me for merely warning her there was a risk (not for forbidding her).