Are there any other reasons for not using carpet?
Here in Oz it is quite common to have carpet.
Yes, makes for lousy acoustics. It deadens the sound. And in Canada, with our severe winters, with people plodding into church wearing slushy boots, the carpet would rapidly become a disaster in less than a season.
Carpet in church is bad for acoustics. Of course it’s nearly universal in churches built after the 1960s. Bad acoustics, bad sound systems, bad music.
Completely disagree. What you say may be true if the “sacred music” is a rock-and-roll type band, but as someone who has been singing in a Gregorian Schola for 15+ years, Gregorian will never ever make a comeback if you carpet churches. I’ve sung in hard-surfaced churches, in churches with lots of carpeting (mostly in the sanctuary), and in a former chapel converted into a concert venue, where acoustic panels were placed on the ceiling to do the job of a carpet in deadening sound. Gregorian chant (if you can hear it at all) sounds awful in those circumstances.
The propers in particular have lots of subtleties that will get completely soaked up by the carpet, and to make ourselves heard, the cantors have to really strain our voices, which distorts the chant and makes it more likely that we go off-key. Remember that chant was “designed” around the acoustics of hard-surfaced great stone churches of the medieval era, and that’s where it sounds best.
When I built the small oratory in my study, I had it partitioned off from the rest of the room with a large frosted glass panel, and while the study itself is carpeted, the oratory has granite floor tiles. I can sing the Offices without having to strain my voice, whereas in a carpeted environment I do have to strain my voice as the sound gets lost.