Getting The Youth Back in the Church!

  • Thread starter Thread starter adawgj
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I get the impression from many religious educators I’ve had that they think they have to alter or at least withhold some of their content to make it more appealing to young people. They shouldn’t. This watering down only seems to have the effect on most of us that faith isn’t all that important after all, or even if it is, it’s only a small “part” of life, not the meaning of life. They shouldn’t just barely teach what the faith is. They should include apologetics. Here’s what we believe, and why. Here’s why it’s good and reasonable to believe this, and not the contrary. But what ends up happening sometimes is that they’ll say something, and then "but…” It happened to me a few days ago. I was being taught Thomas Aquinas’ five ways in philosophy class at school, and instead of giving examples so we could understand and believe in them, he barely commented and then went on to say the “weaknesses” that there are in the arguments proving God. Supposed weaknesses that were easily answerable, but weren’t answered! Really?!

And those youth groups… Show us the beauty of Catholicism rather than trying to make your programs resemble Protestantism as much as you can. In my confirmation class we did crafts and were given vague sermons about being a good person… Please, there is so much more to the faith, and this is what happens? No wonder so many youth don’t care about being Catholic anymore! In order to really know the depth these days it seems you either have to be born into a good Catholic family who cares about your religious education and teaches you themselves, or you have to somehow have the desire to research it yourself, but most can’t be bothered to do that. It’s sad.
 
I get the impression from many religious educators I’ve had that they think they have to alter or at least withhold some of their content to make it more appealing to young people. They shouldn’t. This watering down only seems to have the effect on most of us that faith isn’t all that important after all, or even if it is, it’s only a small “part” of life, not the meaning of life. They shouldn’t just barely teach what the faith is. They should include apologetics. Here’s what we believe, and why. Here’s why it’s good and reasonable to believe this, and not the contrary. But what ends up happening sometimes is that they’ll say something, and then "but…” It happened to me a few days ago. I was being taught Thomas Aquinas’ five ways in philosophy class at school, and instead of giving examples so we could understand and believe in them, he barely commented and then went on to say the “weaknesses” that there are in the arguments proving God. Supposed weaknesses that were easily answerable, but weren’t answered! Really?!

And those youth groups… Show us the beauty of Catholicism rather than trying to make your programs resemble Protestantism as much as you can. In my confirmation class we did crafts and were given vague sermons about being a good person… Please, there is so much more to the faith, and this is what happens? No wonder so many youth don’t care about being Catholic anymore! In order to really know the depth these days it seems you either have to be born into a good Catholic family who cares about your religious education and teaches you themselves, or you have to somehow have the desire to research it yourself, but most can’t be bothered to do that. It’s sad.
Totally agree with you. That’s how it felt after getting confirmed. I knew my prayers, but I didn’t know my heritage. Fortunately my youth group is taught well, we have fun, but we also have Bible studies, discussions on moral teachings, who Christ is etc.
 
unfortunately, i didn’t participate much in youth activities at my parish in high school because i was too shy and terrified of people and slo i live in a part of city where there are mainly elderly people so te have been here weren’t a whole lot of youth. but since i’ve gone to university, there have been great groups, newman club, catholic-christian outreach, youth for christ etC… al very christ centered and wonderfu. the main things ot have programs available. looking back, i wish there had just been more things to do because it is sometimes hard ot keep up with the adults. and i was only baptized when i was 12 and had confirmation a year later so i did miss a lot of stuff. no one’s fault really, it was just the timing. i do think there needs to be continuing program aafter confirmation though because high school years are important to keep people engaged. but maybe i just wasn’t looking hard enough for stuff because i was scared
 
I think people are seeing it the wrong way. Nowadays after confirmation kids will just slowly drift away from the church and they try to have “post-confirmation” programs to reintegrate them. I think what should be done is to get the kids involved in church from young. Encourage parents to let their boys be servers and girls in the choir. From there they learn to be part of the parish community. Its always easier to teach little kids good habits than angsty teens.
 
You can encourage all you want, but if the parents don’t make practicing their faith a priority there is little a catechist is going to be able to do in CCD. I find that those kids whose families go to church, pray as a family, and put God as a priority in their life, want to learn about God, the others are just there to receive First Communion and Confirmation. If what we teach is not reinforced at home, then, except for a few rare cases, we are not going to get anywhere with them.
 
You can encourage all you want, but if the parents don’t make practicing their faith a priority there is little a catechist is going to be able to do in CCD. I find that those kids whose families go to church, pray as a family, and put God as a priority in their life, want to learn about God, the others are just there to receive First Communion and Confirmation. If what we teach is not reinforced at home, then, except for a few rare cases, we are not going to get anywhere with them.
This is the correct answer.

The greatest prayer of the Jews was Deuteronomy 6:4-9, known as the “Shema Yisrael” or “Hear, O Israel”

"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD; and you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. And these words which I command you this day shall be upon your heart; and you shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise. And you shall bind them as a sign upon your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. And you shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates. (Deuteronomy 6:4-9)

The Jews failed to teach their children and it caused nothing but trouble for them.

Only take heed, and keep your soul diligently, lest you forget the things which your eyes have seen, and lest they depart from your heart all the days of your life; make them known to your children and your children’s children – (Deuteronomy 4:9)

Church attendance will take care of itself if we teach our children.

-Tim-
 
Well tradition was/is very appealing to me as a young adult. I’ve noticed that a lot of devout young Catholics are absorbing as much tradition as they can.
I get the impression from many religious educators I’ve had that they think they have to alter or at least withhold some of their content to make it more appealing to young people. They shouldn’t. This watering down only seems to have the effect on most of us that faith isn’t all that important after all, or even if it is, it’s only a small “part” of life, not the meaning of life. They shouldn’t just barely teach what the faith is. They should include apologetics. Here’s what we believe, and why. Here’s why it’s good and reasonable to believe this, and not the contrary. But what ends up happening sometimes is that they’ll say something, and then "but…” It happened to me a few days ago. I was being taught Thomas Aquinas’ five ways in philosophy class at school, and instead of giving examples so we could understand and believe in them, he barely commented and then went on to say the “weaknesses” that there are in the arguments proving God. Supposed weaknesses that were easily answerable, but weren’t answered! Really?!

And those youth groups… Show us the beauty of Catholicism rather than trying to make your programs resemble Protestantism as much as you can. In my confirmation class we did crafts and were given vague sermons about being a good person… Please, there is so much more to the faith, and this is what happens? No wonder so many youth don’t care about being Catholic anymore! In order to really know the depth these days it seems you either have to be born into a good Catholic family who cares about your religious education and teaches you themselves, or you have to somehow have the desire to research it yourself, but most can’t be bothered to do that. It’s sad.
I agree with you 110%. I cannot remember anything of import from CCD. And if the Church fails to teach young people the authentic faith, the secular world sure as heck does not miss any opportunity to spread false information about the Church. They’ll be “educated” about Catholicism one way or the other and if it’s coming from outside the Church there’s a 99% chance it is negative and false. I’m still weeding out misconceptions from high school and college.
40.png
Joannm:
You can encourage all you want, but if the parents don’t make practicing their faith a priority there is little a catechist is going to be able to do in CCD. I find that those kids whose families go to church, pray as a family, and put God as a priority in their life, want to learn about God, the others are just there to receive First Communion and Confirmation. If what we teach is not reinforced at home, then, except for a few rare cases, we are not going to get anywhere with them.
Agreed 150% 👍. If the adults don’t take it seriously why should the children?
 
Getting the youth and by youth I mean any between the ages of 0 and 40 back to church should be the NUMBER ONE objective right now, period. There’s so much focus on this issue and that issue and yet the next generation of Catholics just keeps walking out the door and could care less. Yes, it’s wonderful if an older person wants to come back to the Church. This is a great thing. However, what happens when the youth fall away? Will they even get married in the Church? Will these people baptize and raise their children as Catholics? Who will be our next priests, monks, nuns… or saints? This needs an intense and urgent focus.

The problem is that I don’t know if the hierarchy knows what it is that will bring back the youth. We take a look at youth Masses, is this what they think will bring young people back? Why do they think young people want religion dumbed down? One of the Catholic Church’s biggest lures should be its rich tradition. We have the heavenly riches of the Sacraments (esp. the Eucharist), the Holy Liturgy, our Blessed Mother, the saints, etc. Lets also add in our rich tradition of theology, history (not the mythical nonsense in the history books that always paints the Church as evil), devotions, art, music, etc. Why are these things not intensely celebrated?

It’s interesting when you look at teenagers one of the big things that seems to pop out is that many of them want to be different. They get into punk, emo, goth, or whatever other niche lifestyles. Why do these people not go to the Church? Maybe the Church is too much like the rest of the world? The Church should be counter-cultural, we should be unlike anything else in the world. Isn’t that what Christ asked for?

and yes, tradition is so important. As a 28 year old, I can definitely say that as I started growing more in the faith I immediately gravitated towards Tradition. I look around when I go to EF Masses and I see a lot of young people who are there alone without parents, these are really devoted people.

I’ve spent too much time here arguing with people who don’t get mine and other young people’s attraction to the older form of the Mass, or they don’t get how we like hearing the Mass in a foreign language, or hearing music that’s hundreds of years old (in a foreign language), or whatever else. Shouldn’t you be embracing these things if it’s what gets young people into the pews?
I think people are seeing it the wrong way. Nowadays after confirmation kids will just slowly drift away from the church and they try to have “post-confirmation” programs to reintegrate them. I think what should be done is to get the kids involved in church from young. Encourage parents to let their boys be servers and girls in the choir. From there they learn to be part of the parish community. Its always easier to teach little kids good habits than angsty teens.
Yes, people need to be engaged from when they are young, but only so many kids can be altar servers or sing in the choir. There needs to be more to it.
 
What if in the process of “getting youth back to Church”, we viewed Mass attendance as possibly the last step, not the first, in their return? IE- Mass attendance is not an end unto itself?

In other words, we should meet the pastoral need before the obligation. Addiction, abuse, divorce, anxiety, depression, poverty, citizenship, employment, homelessness, re-location, etc…

After the pastoral need is acknowledged, then we do the pastoral catechesis like this…There is sacrifice in the daily routine of life- they are simply unaware that Mass is a mirror of that life. The obligation of Mass would make more sense if the Mass was seen as Christian mission and not an end in itself. We need an affirmation of lives gathered- a place to connect but not to own my identity. We spend so much time and energy trying to “get youth to Mass”. Instead, we should equip them with the word, ritual, sacrifice and community of the Mass incarnationally present in their daily lives.
 
It looks to me that Catholic school religions classes and CCD need to be overhauled. At Catholic schools, the religion is very much sentimentalized and domesticated. Someone pointed out that young people want to be different and that is true, but teachers are not letting the stark contrast between the Church and the world show in classes. In my religion classes, they only concentrate only social issues and nothing that is the least bit controversial. My religion teacher not to long ago once said that the sin of humanity is the exclusion of other people. Come on, one can hear that everywhere in society in some shape of form. I have also volunteered with CCD at my parish and notice the same thing: teachers promoting the bare minimum.

If there is anything that I have learned in life, it is that when something is easy, it is usually not worth doing, and young people desire something challenging. My freshman year religion class consisted mostly of watching feel-good family movies like Dolphin Tale and Soul Surfer and we never got any actual homework. I’m a junior now and watching movies and talking about social issues is still the bulk of what we do. Few people bother to even read the textbooks and still end up passing because our exams are way too easy. What I think would help if Catholic schools and other religious education programs go from the bottom up, starting with the existence of God and then introducing dogma by dogma. Just top-down preaching Jesus is not going to do anything if there is no strong foundation. And enough with the sentimentality and more rationality; sentiment is the last thing anyone needs in a overly emotive culture. And real homework like any other class. And apologetics should be done early on, not senior year like I will take.
 
One thing I learned when I went to Catholic school from our religion/music teacher (she taught both subjects) is that we may leave the church for a bit… it happens when we explore. But God will call us back. That has always resonated with me, as it did happen to me. I had the foundation laid for me as I grew up, but I made my own decision based on my belief system that I had burned into myself… and feel really attached to the church at 25 years old… so much that my wife is switching from Lutheranism to Catholicism… as she finds that same personal connection between us and God that I do.

I will agree though, the traditions of the church are what makes it different from other religions. There is a certain feeling you get when you hear beautiful chanting, latin, beautiful yet solemn music… it just brings about joy and a connection with God. That along with a Priest that “get’s it” (the Parish my wife and I belong to has a 35 year old Priest… he is wonderful, and loves the tradition of the Church as well). That is why I have a hard time understanding why some Parishes keep trying to copy protestant and non-denom religions… I honestly don’t believe that is helping. It is just making for an identity crisis with the Church that doesn’t help in recruiting the youth, as they don’t know what to expect.
 
Being 63 I don’t qualify as being young but I can say that I feel if we went back to the Traditional Latin Mass more people would attend - young and old. We have a very holy and prayerful priest at my church - he tries his best to get people active – we are always having some sort of prayer going on. We have daily Mass 7 days a week with Adoration, Rosary, Divine Mercy, and Confession before each of the 12 Masses he says a week - very few take advantage of this. Even on Sunday when I begin the Rosary there may be 2 people sitting in the pews - about the time I’m finished we have about 85% of who will be attending that Mass there but only half participate in the Rosary. I pray for the day the Latin Mass is made available in every church.
 
Being 63 I don’t qualify as being young but I can say that I feel if we went back to the Traditional Latin Mass more people would attend - young and old. We have a very holy and prayerful priest at my church - he tries his best to get people active – we are always having some sort of prayer going on. We have daily Mass 7 days a week with Adoration, Rosary, Divine Mercy, and Confession before each of the 12 Masses he says a week - very few take advantage of this. Even on Sunday when I begin the Rosary there may be 2 people sitting in the pews - about the time I’m finished we have about 85% of who will be attending that Mass there but only half participate in the Rosary. I pray for the day the Latin Mass is made available in every church.
I disagree. We’ve had Latin Mass in our city for many years, and although there is a small group of beautiful teenagers, for the most part, the youth in our city are not interested at all.
 
You can encourage all you want, but if the parents don’t make practicing their faith a priority there is little a catechist is going to be able to do in CCD. I find that those kids whose families go to church, pray as a family, and put God as a priority in their life, want to learn about God, the others are just there to receive First Communion and Confirmation. If what we teach is not reinforced at home, then, except for a few rare cases, we are not going to get anywhere with them.
I’m ambivalent about this.

Yes, it would seem that if parents raise their children well, they will continue their involvement with the church of their childhood and in many cases, the children do continue to practice their faith.

But in many cases, the children do NOT continue to practice their faith, even if they’ve been raised well by good parents who did everything right.

I’m 56 years old, and I’ve seen many families, Catholic and Protestant, in which the parents did an excellent job of raising their children.

But the children still depart the church the instant they come of age and sometimes sooner, while they are still teenagers living at home.

Parents can force a young child or pre-teen to go church with them, but it’s easier said than done to force a fully-grown young man or young woman to go to church. Most parents admit defeat and allow the defiant teen to stay home. Others in the Church may disapprove and tell these long-suffering parents to “grow a spine and FORCE that young buck to get out of bed and go to church, dag nabbit!”, but these other folks aren’t the ones who have to deal with the teenager on a daily basis, and so IMO, would be well-advised to keep their mouths shut and pray instead of chastise other parents who are often at their wits’ end.

I think what we have to do is recognize that each human being is unique and must actualize their OWN faith, not their parents’ faith. This doesn’t always happen, and it’s
heartbreaking for parents. I don’t think there’s an easy answer to the OP’s question.

I think that the local parish should do everything they possibly can to attract and keep the youth, and to approach this with multiple strategies, not just a “one size fits all” approach.

I think that many young people will respond well to more contemporary music, social activities, and a youth pastor who wears jeans, and adults should not scoff at this approach and label it “Protestant.” There are a lot of Protestant churches using this approach who have a thousand young people attending church.

I think that other young people respond better to different approaches. Some young people crave a really really DEEEEEEP study group with a college-level approach, lots of homework, and a priest leading the study who treats the kids like young seminarians or disciples. I think this approach would be useful to attracting the kids who lean towards “traditionalist” Catholicism and are always unhappy with their parish and longing for St. John Cantius. Add a study of saints, a schola that studies chant, a course in Latin, and a movement towards personal holiness using various traditional prayers and chaplets, and I think a lot of these traditionalist teens would become very loyal in their attendance.

I think that many other teens would RUN away, not walk, if this “traditionalist” approach was the only approach used in their parish! A parish should not abandon Matt Maher music and facilitated discussion about movies and replace it entirely with Vierne and the Chaplet of the Wounds of Christ!

Like I said, multiple strategies, not a “one size fits all!” This is a war (see Ephesians 6:12), and we are battling for the souls of our children. We need to open ourselves up to many different strikes on many fronts and stop trying to prove that our approach is the “only approach that will work for Catholic parishes.” That’s the kind of thinking that is losing our young people to Protestantism and to churchlessness…

I think that other young people long for a mentor/friend/buddy and some one-on-one hanging out time. These young people may very well avoid being with all the other young people and instead, just hang out with their “guru”, whoever they happen to bond with in the parish. Why not?

I think many young people want to be involved with service to their community and world, and respond well when the parish offers plenty of opportunities to be involved and make a difference. Mission trips to countries outside of the U.S. as well as to other states are very appealing to a lot of teenagers. Also, attending events like the March for Life. These types of youth activities take a lot of planning and money, but can really hold onto teenagers.

And some teenagers will come to church because their boyfriend or girlfriend comes to church, so IMO, dating teens should be welcomed by a parish!

There’s just no one easy answer. The parishes should use multiple approaches and recruit more people than just one overworked underpaid youth minister and a few time-pressed youth sponsors. BTW, in the larger Protestant churches, youth pastors are paid extremely well, with good reason.
 
I disagree. We’ve had Latin Mass in our city for many years, and although there is a small group of beautiful teenagers, for the most part, the youth in our city are not interested at all.
The English Mass isn’t doing that well either youthwise. The Spanish Mass OTOH…
 
You can encourage all you want, but if the parents don’t make practicing their faith a priority there is little a catechist is going to be able to do in CCD. I find that those kids whose families go to church, pray as a family, and put God as a priority in their life, want to learn about God, the others are just there to receive First Communion and Confirmation. If what we teach is not reinforced at home, then, except for a few rare cases, we are not going to get anywhere with them.
I’ve seen stats showing that the father is usually the more influential as far as the kids’ church attendance goes. Don’t ask me why but the mother much less so.
 
Give them a solid and sound understanding of philosophy so they can proper understand the preamble of the faith. How can they believe in the supernatural dogmas in this hostile world without even being able to defend the existence of God? Teach them solid principles of thought.
 
You can encourage all you want, but if the parents don’t make practicing their faith a priority there is little a catechist is going to be able to do in CCD. .
I’m going to respectfully disagree with this, based upon the experience of two fourth grade Catholic school teachers in my area. They found that their enthusiasm for their faith led the non-Catholic children in their classrooms to the faith and that heir parents followed their lead into the Church.

These days, so many parents suffer from limited catechesis, that their children, the beneficiaries of your catechesis, may well become a wellspring of faith and information for them.

We have a tremendous gift in our faith and it is well worth sharing. The children in your care may well become the evangelists who bring their parents ever closer to Our Lord.
May God bless them and their families.
 
What our parish has begun doing is offering our daily Mass
for the young people in our parish and young parents
and families. Obviously most of these young people
are either at work or school.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top