Z
Zoe_Brain
Guest
Before we go any further on this, I think it all comes down to defining what is a man, and what is a woman. And although for 59 people out of 60, that’s simple and obvious, mere “common sense”, it’s a little more difficult for the 1 in 60, and a whole heck of a lot more difficult for 1 in 1000. For 1 in 100,000 the question may even be meaningless, as neither fits.
I think before commenting further, people should look at the following threads. There’s a lot of good information on the biological issues there, and an expert opinion from a canon lawyer that is extremely helpful in deciding what the Church’s position actually is.
Transsexualism - why is it so despised?
What is the Church’s position on the Intersexed and Transsexed?
Sex-change: Hypothetical situation
Is transgender a sin?
Theology of the Body–as it relates to transgender
Overcoming Transgender Issues
The later threads are more valuable, because much of what was “thought to be true” in 2004 has been “proven to be true” in the last 5 years. Note that the Church’s *sub secretum *statement was issued in 2000, based on the state of scientific knowledge in the 1990’s. Nonetheless, though they may have got some of the details wrong (like what transsexuality actually is, and what causes it…), they got the basics right.
I think before commenting further, people should look at the following threads. There’s a lot of good information on the biological issues there, and an expert opinion from a canon lawyer that is extremely helpful in deciding what the Church’s position actually is.
Transsexualism - why is it so despised?
What is the Church’s position on the Intersexed and Transsexed?
Sex-change: Hypothetical situation
Is transgender a sin?
Theology of the Body–as it relates to transgender
Overcoming Transgender Issues
The later threads are more valuable, because much of what was “thought to be true” in 2004 has been “proven to be true” in the last 5 years. Note that the Church’s *sub secretum *statement was issued in 2000, based on the state of scientific knowledge in the 1990’s. Nonetheless, though they may have got some of the details wrong (like what transsexuality actually is, and what causes it…), they got the basics right.
The Church teaches that gender is innate and immutable.I agree completely, and will even go so far as to say it’s set at about the 12th week of gestation, when the lymbic system of the brain first starts to develop. All of the other criteria are mutable by circumstance, genetic or environmental accident, or by human intervention. Yes, even the chromosomes - a pregnant woman carrying a boy child will have some cells in her bloodstream from the foetus, so a simple karyotype or genetic test may show she is male. She temporarily becomes a mosaic.
The Church also teaches that surgery to alter the body does not alter the innate gender. I agree there too. Neurology is all, external shape nothing.
Finally the Church teaches that sex reassignment surgery may be moral in extreme cases to relieve distress - which I take to mean when the body shape and neurology don’t match, a hideously uncomfortable situation for the patient.
I don’t agree though that everyone is either male or female. A number of people have neurology that fits neither stereotype well. They almost always have very severe Intersex conditions as well, so their gender is indeterminate. Not a “third sex” so much as “neutral”.