C
ComradeAndrei
Guest
How is that “faulty logic”? I didn’t say altar girls are to be discouraged, I would just not allow them and that would be well within my perogative. I do not question Rome, they allow the option of altar girls and I assent. I do not get all up in arms if I see girls serving as that is an option left to the discretion of the Ordinary to allow in his diocese and the Pastor in his parish.However, to jump from that statement to the conclusion that altar girls are to be discouraged is faulty logic. And to then support that faulty logic by modifying the Vatican’s words to include an extra “only” is following one’s own agenda as the spirit of Redemptionis Sacramentum.
However, the Vatican definately encourages altar boys and seems to allow for altar girls in case of necessity or for other reasons at the discretion of the bishop. That is not the same thing. The quote from EWTN says “to retain as far as possible the custom of only boys…” TO RETAIN AS FAR AS POSSIBLE the custom of only boys. Do you deny that it has been the custom to only allow boys to serve? I should hope not.
It seems stepping far off from tradition would be an illogical way to read into any statement from the Vatican-again, I lay the charge of misinterpretation at your door.
I don’t presume to speak for AltarMan, but I will again address the issue as I see it.Your right, that is not conclusive. Are you in the Lincoln diocese? If so, how are girl alter-servers a problem when you don’t have them?
I think some people see the issue as one of practicallity, and it is not, or at least that is not the big deal. How many Sunday Novus Ordo Masses have you gone to that use the whole big entourage of altar boys like they use in most Tridentine High Masses? I know I don’t see many, if any at all.
It is a matter of psychology, again I say it. You people don’t realize how allowing girls to serve really takes away from the boys’ desire to keep serving. Call it sexist, call it dumb, but that is just the way most preteen boys work.
cont…