R
rocklobster
Guest
I just heard something pretty disturbing. A recent survey found out that kids would rather have iPods than a right to vote. What do you folks think about this?
How old are these kids?I just heard something pretty disturbing. A recent survey found out that kids would rather have iPods than a right to vote. What do you folks think about this?
It would be helpful if someone has a link to a report on the actual survey for context. I saw “kids” and thought “of course they would say that, they are children”. I don’t consider university students to be “kids” in that sense, perhaps as I have a 7 year old.They were students at New York University, I believe.
Quite possibly, when one considers that those young people who are thoughtful and responsible enough to realize the value of franchise are probably also thoughtful and responsible enough not to vote democrat.I read your post and assumed this was a GOP plot…
How big a hard drive? And does that include free downloads from the iTunes store?I just heard something pretty disturbing. A recent survey found out that kids would rather have iPods than a right to vote. What do you folks think about this?
Perhaps yours doesn’t but mine does. There have been local races and issues in which I have voted that were decided by one vote.…After all, your vote doesn’t really make any difference…
Is it Smarter to Sell Your Vote or to Cast it?
By Ryan Hagen
Half of N.Y.U. students say they would sell their right to vote for $1 million, according to a poll published yesterday by the Washington Square News.
Sixty-six percent said they would trade their voting rights for a free four-year ride at N.Y.U. (roughly $160,000, including room and board). Twenty percent would give up the vote for an iPod Touch (value: $299).
We know that voting doesn’t make good economic sense. Dubner and Levitt have written about the utility — or is it futility? — of voting here, here and here. But is it smarter to sell your vote than to cast it?
George W. Bush spent $345 million to win re-election in 2004, according to opensecrets.org, a cost of around $5.56 a vote. John Kerry spent just over $5.24 per vote. Those numbers don’t include third party spending, but for the sake of a hypothetical let’s just say votes in a presidential election cost $5.50 apiece. It should follow that selling your one vote for $1 million could buy you enough influence to capture 181,818 more. So maybe this poll doesn’t demonstrate youth apathy, it demonstrates youth economic savvy. (Then again, if you’re a fringe candidate, it’s possible to spend vast sums in politics without having any impact whatsoever.)
But how about you? Would you sell your vote for $1 million, or an iPod Touch, or free college tuition? And what would democracy look like if you could?
Dream on.Sure, they might say that, but when the rubber meets the road, would they really do it? I’d like to think that they’re intelligent enough that they know the right to vote cannot be traded or taken away.
That’s what I’d like to think, anyway.
Unfortunately there are plenty of folks much older than 18 who do exactly the same. They vote for whoever their local paper tells them to vote for, or their favorite pundit, or their favorite religious figure, etc. All too often the votes are based on a single issue.It doesn’t surprise me a bit. That just the way kids are. I think giving the right to vote to 18-year olds was a mistake. Until they’ve been in the world for a while, all most kids do is:
a. Vote the same as Mom and Dad
b. Vote exactly the opposite as Mom and Dad
c. Vote for who their high school or college profess tells them to vote for.