Global Warming: Speech by Al Gore filled with vulgarity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monte_RCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Calling Al Moritz. St Anastasia.

Hear that one?

How about telling us what you have learned and stop deflecting.
Nope, never. Do they teach it in school? Because I don’t have time to waste on useless references. But seriously, my expertise is in scientific epistemology. Do you know what that is? You can look it up on wikipedia if you don’t have time for school, or research, or actual study or thinking.
 
You have failed to answer a basic science question here, I still have no answer for all of your expertise in your unknown field of work.
Honestly, my real passion is Classical music, but I’m not very good at playing it. So I’ve decided to take a piano course this semester in additoin to my science work. Honestly, I am doing a study on how to lie when you are doing scientific studies. It’s been very useful and it is going to revolutionize the whole entire field of science. Haha.

You take yourself too seriously. You are so enraged. Maybe we should just stop talking to each other.
 
Nope, never. Do they teach it in school? Because I don’t have time to waste on useless references. But seriously, my expertise is in scientific epistemology. Do you know what that is? You can look it up on wikipedia if you don’t have time for school, or research, or actual study or thinking.
Your posts seem to contradict. Let’s look at your actual words in this thread. And, with your vast knowledge on so many subjects you still fail to answer my question.

Now you claim to have a “special” area of study.

We all know what that means. Non Science.
 
Is there any reason for me to continue talking here? You know I do have other things to do. I just thought it would be fun to talk to some people. Everyone is so uptight. Sometimes you have to laugh at yourself. Look, if you want to understand science, you have to work through the writings of at least Johannes Kepler, Gottfried Leibniz, Carl Gauss, and Bernhard Riemann. Just do it. If you are not going to do it, don’t waste my time asking me questions about science.
 
Goodness Folks!!!

It isn’t about your scientific expertize.

It’s weather or not claims made by AGW’ers and IPCC are supportable with observational evidence.
 
Your posts seem to contradict. Let’s look at your actual words in this thread. And, with your vast knowledge on so many subjects you still fail to answer my question.

Now you claim to have a “special” area of study.

We all know what that means. Non Science.
Don’t you know what epistemology is. It’s not my major, but it’s basically what my expertise is in. Epistemology is the science of how you know something.

If you don’t have a foundation in epistemology, then you really can’t do anything in science. So tell me this, how do you know something? Can you answer that question?
 
Goodness Folks!!!

It isn’t about your scientific expertize.

It’s **weather **or not claims made by AGW’ers and IPCC are supportable with observational evidence.
I hope you realize how funny your spelling error is in this case.
Did you suffer from a Catholic education? So sorry.
 
Goodness Folks!!!

It isn’t about your scientific expertize.

It’s weather or not claims made by AGW’ers and IPCC are supportable with observational evidence.
Well, the question is How do you know? That’s what we should be talking about. We are assuming we know how we know, and we have never said anything about that subject. How do you know if anthropogenic global warming is true? Did the IPCC tell you how to know this? Or did they just say “Hey, look at these charts. They show that you are going to die if you don’t use solar panels and windmills”
 
Don’t you know what epistemology is. It’s not my major, but it’s basically what my expertise is in. Epistemology is the science of how you know something.

If you don’t have a foundation in epistemology, then you really can’t do anything in science. So tell me this, how do you know something? Can you answer that question?
You can’t even answer a basic science question. Anyone can realize what your expertise is worth, and your area of it.
 
Goodness Folks!!!

It isn’t about your scientific expertize.

It’s weather or not claims made by AGW’ers and IPCC are supportable with observational evidence.
Honestly, I shouldn’t have to tell anyone about what I am studying. It is no one’s business. If you can’t listen to what I have to say to you, it really doesn’t matter what I say about expertise. He kept harassing me for it, so I told him. Anyone can understand this stuff if they just study it. You don’t need to have a piece of paper that says you know something to know it.
 
You can’t even answer a basic science question. Anyone can realize what your expertise is worth, and your area of it.
Tell me, what is your question? What is it with all this expertize talk? What is your expertize? Did you major in Expertize 101 in college?

Do you have a Ph. D. in the field of expertize? Really, you are just not making any sense to me. Are we here to argue about who has expertize in what?

I’m not even going to ask what your expertise is in anymore. You don’t even have to answer that question. I don’t even care honestly. It’s none of my business anyways.
 
I hope you realize how funny your spelling error is in this case.
Did you suffer from a Catholic education? So sorry.
This is what you need to prove the claims of AGW IPCC

TACKLE THESE FIRST

To prove human production of carbon dioxide caused global warming, the following would need to be observed:

1:Sustained unusually high global atmospheric temperatures; WITH,

2:Ongoing rising global atmospheric temperatures; WITH,

3:Clear evidence that carbon dioxide raises Earth’s global atmospheric temperature;
WITH,

4:Clear evidence that human production of carbon dioxide controls global
atmospheric CO2 levels; WITH,

5:Clear evidence that warmer temperatures are catastrophic.

ALL FIVE HAVE TO BE PROVEN TO PROVE THE CLAIMS OF AGW AND CO2 IS THE MAIN DRIVER OF CLIMATE.

NO ONE…NOT IPCC…NOT ANYONE has made even one of these evidences - let alone connecting Two to each other.

Then we can discuss my typo :D:D
 
Honestly, I shouldn’t have to tell anyone about what I am studying. It is no one’s business. If you can’t listen to what I have to say to you, it really doesn’t matter what I say about expertise. He kept harassing me for it, so I told him. Anyone can understand this stuff if they just study it. You don’t need to have a piece of paper that says you know something to know it.
IMO It’s best to Overlook trolling techniques used by some. 🤷🤷
 
This is what you need to prove the claims of AGW IPCC

TACKLE THESE FIRST

To prove human production of carbon dioxide caused global warming, the following would need to be observed:

1:Sustained unusually high global atmospheric temperatures; WITH,

2:Ongoing rising global atmospheric temperatures; WITH,

3:Clear evidence that carbon dioxide raises Earth’s global atmospheric temperature;
WITH,

4:Clear evidence that human production of carbon dioxide controls global
atmospheric CO2 levels; WITH,

5:Clear evidence that warmer temperatures are catastrophic.

ALL FIVE HAVE TO BE PROVEN TO PROVE THE CLAIMS OF AGW AND CO2 IS THE MAIN DRIVER OF CLIMATE.

NO ONE…NOT IPCC…NOT ANYONE has made even one of these evidences - let alone connecting Two to each other.

Then we can discuss my typo :D:D
I am still waiting for an answer to my first question on this thread. Never got it, and don’t expect to. I will deal with your multiple questions once we get your college student to answer one. One question.

Anyone can attempt it.
 
Trolling? What is that?
I’ve heard of trolling, but honestly, I don’t have a lot of time to spend on a computer all day. I have real work to do. So I can’t always know all these computer terms.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top