K
kimmielittle
Guest
How so… ???You made a serious mistake by posting that.
His scientific expertize was called into question by you…that is an ad hominem attack - A violation of CAF rules.
How so… ???You made a serious mistake by posting that.
There is a little button you can hit and report it.I’ve heard of trolling, but honestly, I don’t have a lot of time to spend on a computer all day. I have real work to do. So I can’t always know all these computer terms.
Not a rule violation. Hit the button if you believe it is.How so… ???
His scientific expertize was called into question by you…that is an ad hominem attack - A violation of CAF rules.
CONDUCT RULESNot a rule violation. Hit the button if you believe it is.
SoOOOoo your answers are contingent upon conditions?I am still waiting for an answer to my first question on this thread. Never got it, and don’t expect to. I will deal with your multiple questions once we get your college student to answer one. One question.
Anyone can attempt it.
No personal attacks to be found, unless you can find them somehow.CONDUCT RULES
Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of personal attacks,
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=2
There are numerous Trolling techniques,Personal attacks… Ad hominems… distracting the thread off topic attempts ]…harassment…spam etc etcI’ve heard of trolling, but honestly, I don’t have a lot of time to spend on a computer all day. I have real work to do. So I can’t always know all these computer terms.
Science is always in progress. I am sorry you were informed otherwise.SoOOOoo your answers are contingent upon conditions?
SCIENCE IN PROGRESS![]()
The best advice I can give you is to report any such activity. Making sure you yourself did not violate any rules in the process. Humility, a forgotten virtue.There are numerous Trolling techniques,Personal attacks… Ad hominems… distracting the thread off topic attempts ]…harassment…spam etc etc
Calling his scientific credibility in question - AND continuance of demands to provide you evidence of it.No personal attacks to be found, unless you can find them somehow.
Science is always in progress. I am sorry you were informed otherwise.
I must believe all things your friend posts.Calling his scientific credibility in question - AND continuance of demands to provide you evidence of it.
You do not have this right: PERIODUnless, you can provide us hard evidence that you do have tis right.
READ your past posts for evidence
So can anyone do this? I personally haven’t seen any evidence produced of any of these things.Then Progress
This is what you need to prove the claims of AGW IPCC
TACKLE THESE FIRST
To prove human production of carbon dioxide caused global warming, the following would need to be observed:
1:Sustained unusually high global atmospheric temperatures; WITH,
2:Ongoing rising global atmospheric temperatures; WITH,
3:Clear evidence that carbon dioxide raises Earth’s global atmospheric temperature;
WITH,
4:Clear evidence that human production of carbon dioxide controls global
atmospheric CO2 levels; WITH,
5:Clear evidence that warmer temperatures are catastrophic.
ALL FIVE HAVE TO BE PROVEN TO PROVE THE CLAIMS OF AGW AND CO2 IS THE MAIN DRIVER OF CLIMATE.
NO ONE…NOT IPCC…NOT ANYONE has made even one of these evidences - let alone connecting Two to each other.
Certainly not…BUT science attacks the claims NOT the person.I must believe all things your friend posts.
How so? He answered your question of his scientific credentials.No, your friend must answer questions, and he has failed to do so.
Never meant to be…I have used them extensively here at CAF as accents …over 6000 post proves this.Your all caps letters are not scaring me.
I have presented these to Physicist and other Scientists…They are not supported.So can anyone do this? I personally haven’t seen any evidence produced of any of these things.
Well, then why do these people keep insisting that is it true? What are they trying to do?I have presented these to Physicist and other Scientists…They are not supported.
REMEMBER: ALL have to connect to provide observational evidence of causation and effect.
Any takers to define the difference between global warming and climate change?Can we get back on topic? Can anyone produce evidence for man made global warming? Any takers?
Why do so many people believe this stuff?I have presented these to Physicist and other Scientists…They are not supported.
REMEMBER: ALL have to connect to provide observational evidence of causation and effect.
Name names.I have presented these to Physicist and other Scientists…They are not supported.
REMEMBER: ALL have to connect to provide observational evidence of causation and effect.