Gluttony - eating contest

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeteZaHut
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So let’s see. According to St. Thomas there are six ways of committing the sin of gluttony.

They are:

Praepropere – eating too soon
Laute – eating too expensively
Nimis – eating too much
Ardenter – eating too eagerly
Studiose – eating too daintily
Forente – eating too fervently

With the eating contest I would say you’re eating too eagerly, eating too much, and eating too fervently. So yes, I would say you are committing the sin of gluttony by competing in an eating competition.
 
There will always be Pharisees eager to tell you every word, thought and deed is a sin.
 
There will always be Pharisees eager to tell you every word, thought and deed is a sin.
Care to explain how it wouldn’t be gluttony? The Church’s teaching seems pretty clear to me. The purpose of eating is delivering proper nutrition to the body, and anything that is contrary to this purpose is a sin. It really isn’t that difficult: just don’t eat too much, eat too expensively, eat before you need to, and try not to enjoy your food too much. 😃
 
I’m thinking of that TV show “Man Vs Food”.

I think that would be gluttony, right?
 
Care to explain how it wouldn’t be gluttony? The Church’s teaching seems pretty clear to me. The purpose of eating is delivering proper nutrition to the body, and anything that is contrary to this purpose is a sin. It really isn’t that difficult: just don’t eat too much, eat too expensively, eat before you need to, and try not to enjoy your food too much. 😃
I think I’d have to disagree with that. The Church doesn’t hold to some reductionistic, utilitarian view of food and eating. We can enjoy our food. Just look in Scripture. Banquet imagery abounds. The Gospel of Luke, in particular, has many meal scenes. Meals offer an opportunity for bonding and fellowship and celebration. Food is not just a nutrition delivery device.

I’m not sure about eating contests, though. It certainly doesn’t seem to be in keeping with proper stewardship and respect of the body, but maybe an eating contest champion could offer a convincing argument otherwise. :o
 
I think I’d have to disagree with that. The Church doesn’t hold to some reductionistic, utilitarian view of food and eating. We can enjoy our food. Just look in Scripture. Banquet imagery abounds. The Gospel of Luke, in particular, has many meal scenes. Meals offer an opportunity for bonding and fellowship and celebration. Food is not just a nutrition delivery device.
Yes, I know. We can enjoy our food as long as we don’t enjoy it too much.

reminds me of this funny article on the subject.

catholicity.com/commentary/zmirak/04775.html
According to common tradition, it is actually a sin to eat for pleasure. That’s right. The Encyclopedists I cited above explain, in the following sobering passage:
“It is incontrovertible that to eat or drink for the mere pleasure of the experience, and for that exclusively, is likewise to commit the sin of gluttony. Such a temper of soul is equivalently the direct and positive shutting out of that reference to our last end which must be found, at least implicitly, in all our actions.”
But don’t despair, because:
“At the same time it must be noted that there is no obligation to formally and explicitly have before one’s mind a motive which will immediately relate our actions to God. It is enough that such an intention should be implied in the apprehension of the thing as lawful with a consequent virtual submission to Almighty God.”
I’m glad we’ve got that clear. So, just to sum up: Eating and drinking are simple, natural pleasures given us by the generosity of God. And we’re free to enjoy them as we like, provided we don’t consume them too soon, too expensively, too eagerly, too extensively, or too daintily – and as long as we don’t enjoy them for their own sake, but maintain at least the implicit apprehension that we’re nourishing our bodies to glorify God.
 
Hey Joe 5859, I think that what KostyaJMJ was trying to say was that anything contrary is sinful, eating for the pleasure is not contrary as long as it doesn’t cause you to sin. Otherwise, any time we eat desert we are sinning:D
 
I think I’d have to disagree with that. The Church doesn’t hold to some reductionistic, utilitarian view of food and eating. We can enjoy our food. Just look in Scripture. Banquet imagery abounds. The Gospel of Luke, in particular, has many meal scenes. Meals offer an opportunity for bonding and fellowship and celebration. Food is not just a nutrition delivery device.

I’m not sure about eating contests, though. It certainly doesn’t seem to be in keeping with proper stewardship and respect of the body, but maybe an eating contest champion could offer a convincing argument otherwise. :o
Agreed. As has been stated before, there are always those eager to tell you your every thought, word and deed does not measure up to their personal standards of ‘holiness.’

They drive people away from the Church rather than draw them toward it.
 
"So let’s see. According to St. Thomas there are six ways of committing the sin of gluttony.

They are:

Praepropere – eating too soon
Laute – eating too expensively
Nimis – eating too much
Ardenter – eating too eagerly
Studiose – eating too daintily
Forente – eating too fervently"

Goodness. I’d have a hard time dining with St. Thomas. I really enjoy a meal especially shared with good, fun company and a glass of wine 🙂
 
Goodness. I’d have a hard time dining with St. Thomas. I really enjoy a meal especially shared with good, fun company and a glass of wine 🙂
No you wouldn’t. Let’s just say St. Thomas was one of our … ah … larger saints! He appears to have enjoyed a good time as much as the rest of us.
 
I’m thinking of that TV show “Man Vs Food”.

I think that would be gluttony, right?
Yeah. And he’s not really even competing in a contest.

Worst one was the 8# or so Burrito, which he didn’t finish. Uggggh.

I do like when he tries small “non-gluttonous” quantities of the really, really, really hot foods. I guess it’s a guy thing to enjoy another person’s expression of stupidity through self-inflicted discomfort. 😉
No you wouldn’t. Let’s just say St. Thomas was one of our … ah … larger saints! He appears to have enjoyed a good time as much as the rest of us.
😃

There have been threads on the annual National Hot Dog eating contest. In that case, the sponsors donate funds toward feeding the hungry. Perhaps that mitigates some of the gluttony of such an event.
 
I think it’s safe to say that if you break a rib, you ate too much. 😃
 
Yes, I know. We can enjoy our food as long as we don’t enjoy it too much.

reminds me of this funny article on the subject.

catholicity.com/commentary/zmirak/04775.html
I think I understand what you’re getting at better. Thanks! Nice article, too. 🙂
"So let’s see. According to St. Thomas there are six ways of committing the sin of gluttony.

They are:

Praepropere – eating too soon
Laute – eating too expensively
Nimis – eating too much
Ardenter – eating too eagerly
Studiose – eating too daintily
Forente – eating too fervently"

Goodness. I’d have a hard time dining with St. Thomas. I really enjoy a meal especially shared with good, fun company and a glass of wine 🙂
I haven’t seen this from Aquinas before, but it does seem to offer a useful measuring stick to evaluate our behavior in this regard. That said, I think it still leaves a lot of room for interpretation. Exactly what does it mean to eat “too eagerly”? I don’t think his description excludes the possibility of enjoying our food. That would seem a bit ridiculous to me.
 
Exactly what does it mean to eat “too eagerly”?
I once had a cat who was fed cat food twice a day and little bits of human food whenever we had a meal. Every single time he ate, it was as if he hadn’t eaten in three days. He snarfed the food down in a twinkling at every meal. That’s eating too eagerly. People do that, too. I did it myself the other day when we had some wonderful fresh corn on the cob. :blushing:

Betsy
 
Care to explain how it wouldn’t be gluttony? The Church’s teaching seems pretty clear to me. The purpose of eating is delivering proper nutrition to the body, and anything that is contrary to this purpose is a sin. It really isn’t that difficult: just don’t eat too much, eat too expensively, eat before you need to, and try not to enjoy your food too much. 😃
so if you like it, try not to?

Also, can you define too expensively?

How about too much?
 
‘Too expensively’— twenty percent less than someone else thinks you should spend. 😉
 
"So let’s see. According to St. Thomas there are six ways of committing the sin of gluttony.

They are:

Praepropere – eating too soon
Laute – eating too expensively
Nimis – eating too much
Ardenter – eating too eagerly
Studiose – eating too daintily
Forente – eating too fervently"

Goodness. I’d have a hard time dining with St. Thomas. I really enjoy a meal especially shared with good, fun company and a glass of wine 🙂
I do wonder why Saint Thomas was so overweight?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top