P
PeteZaHut
Guest
Is participating in an eating contest for fun sinful?
Care to explain how it wouldn’t be gluttony? The Church’s teaching seems pretty clear to me. The purpose of eating is delivering proper nutrition to the body, and anything that is contrary to this purpose is a sin. It really isn’t that difficult: just don’t eat too much, eat too expensively, eat before you need to, and try not to enjoy your food too much.There will always be Pharisees eager to tell you every word, thought and deed is a sin.
I think I’d have to disagree with that. The Church doesn’t hold to some reductionistic, utilitarian view of food and eating. We can enjoy our food. Just look in Scripture. Banquet imagery abounds. The Gospel of Luke, in particular, has many meal scenes. Meals offer an opportunity for bonding and fellowship and celebration. Food is not just a nutrition delivery device.Care to explain how it wouldn’t be gluttony? The Church’s teaching seems pretty clear to me. The purpose of eating is delivering proper nutrition to the body, and anything that is contrary to this purpose is a sin. It really isn’t that difficult: just don’t eat too much, eat too expensively, eat before you need to, and try not to enjoy your food too much.![]()
Yes, I know. We can enjoy our food as long as we don’t enjoy it too much.I think I’d have to disagree with that. The Church doesn’t hold to some reductionistic, utilitarian view of food and eating. We can enjoy our food. Just look in Scripture. Banquet imagery abounds. The Gospel of Luke, in particular, has many meal scenes. Meals offer an opportunity for bonding and fellowship and celebration. Food is not just a nutrition delivery device.
According to common tradition, it is actually a sin to eat for pleasure. That’s right. The Encyclopedists I cited above explain, in the following sobering passage:
“It is incontrovertible that to eat or drink for the mere pleasure of the experience, and for that exclusively, is likewise to commit the sin of gluttony. Such a temper of soul is equivalently the direct and positive shutting out of that reference to our last end which must be found, at least implicitly, in all our actions.”
But don’t despair, because:
“At the same time it must be noted that there is no obligation to formally and explicitly have before one’s mind a motive which will immediately relate our actions to God. It is enough that such an intention should be implied in the apprehension of the thing as lawful with a consequent virtual submission to Almighty God.”
I’m glad we’ve got that clear. So, just to sum up: Eating and drinking are simple, natural pleasures given us by the generosity of God. And we’re free to enjoy them as we like, provided we don’t consume them too soon, too expensively, too eagerly, too extensively, or too daintily – and as long as we don’t enjoy them for their own sake, but maintain at least the implicit apprehension that we’re nourishing our bodies to glorify God.
Agreed. As has been stated before, there are always those eager to tell you your every thought, word and deed does not measure up to their personal standards of ‘holiness.’I think I’d have to disagree with that. The Church doesn’t hold to some reductionistic, utilitarian view of food and eating. We can enjoy our food. Just look in Scripture. Banquet imagery abounds. The Gospel of Luke, in particular, has many meal scenes. Meals offer an opportunity for bonding and fellowship and celebration. Food is not just a nutrition delivery device.
I’m not sure about eating contests, though. It certainly doesn’t seem to be in keeping with proper stewardship and respect of the body, but maybe an eating contest champion could offer a convincing argument otherwise.![]()
No you wouldn’t. Let’s just say St. Thomas was one of our … ah … larger saints! He appears to have enjoyed a good time as much as the rest of us.Goodness. I’d have a hard time dining with St. Thomas. I really enjoy a meal especially shared with good, fun company and a glass of wine![]()
Yeah. And he’s not really even competing in a contest.I’m thinking of that TV show “Man Vs Food”.
I think that would be gluttony, right?
No you wouldn’t. Let’s just say St. Thomas was one of our … ah … larger saints! He appears to have enjoyed a good time as much as the rest of us.
I think I understand what you’re getting at better. Thanks! Nice article, too.Yes, I know. We can enjoy our food as long as we don’t enjoy it too much.
reminds me of this funny article on the subject.
catholicity.com/commentary/zmirak/04775.html
I haven’t seen this from Aquinas before, but it does seem to offer a useful measuring stick to evaluate our behavior in this regard. That said, I think it still leaves a lot of room for interpretation. Exactly what does it mean to eat “too eagerly”? I don’t think his description excludes the possibility of enjoying our food. That would seem a bit ridiculous to me."So let’s see. According to St. Thomas there are six ways of committing the sin of gluttony.
They are:
Praepropere – eating too soon
Laute – eating too expensively
Nimis – eating too much
Ardenter – eating too eagerly
Studiose – eating too daintily
Forente – eating too fervently"
Goodness. I’d have a hard time dining with St. Thomas. I really enjoy a meal especially shared with good, fun company and a glass of wine![]()
I once had a cat who was fed cat food twice a day and little bits of human food whenever we had a meal. Every single time he ate, it was as if he hadn’t eaten in three days. He snarfed the food down in a twinkling at every meal. That’s eating too eagerly. People do that, too. I did it myself the other day when we had some wonderful fresh corn on the cob. :blushing:Exactly what does it mean to eat “too eagerly”?
so if you like it, try not to?Care to explain how it wouldn’t be gluttony? The Church’s teaching seems pretty clear to me. The purpose of eating is delivering proper nutrition to the body, and anything that is contrary to this purpose is a sin. It really isn’t that difficult: just don’t eat too much, eat too expensively, eat before you need to, and try not to enjoy your food too much.![]()
I do wonder why Saint Thomas was so overweight?"So let’s see. According to St. Thomas there are six ways of committing the sin of gluttony.
They are:
Praepropere – eating too soon
Laute – eating too expensively
Nimis – eating too much
Ardenter – eating too eagerly
Studiose – eating too daintily
Forente – eating too fervently"
Goodness. I’d have a hard time dining with St. Thomas. I really enjoy a meal especially shared with good, fun company and a glass of wine![]()
He was big-boned.I do wonder why Saint Thomas was so overweight?
And not more than half of what the neighbor two doors down would spend on seventy-five percent of the same item.‘Too expensively’— twenty percent less than someone else thinks you should spend.![]()