God's blood demands are monstrous?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Makerteacher
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Makerteacher:
Her theology allows for no concept of sin, as I understand what she is saying. Lots of good feelings, with no demands made on the parishoners, from what I can see. No one can judge another’s actions.
Ah…the great commandment of modern times “Thou shalt not judge”. Ironicly, by someone saying one should not judge someone else (say someone else shouldn’t do something), they contradict themselves.

If it’s wrong to judge, then it’s wrong to say that.
 
It is funny and illogical. One is not allowed to “judge”, but one is allowed to “judge” one who “judges”. GOOFY!
 
fix said:
[She can’t accept that God allows sacrifice, because then she may have to accept that sacrifice is part of life and salvation. That would mean she would have to change the way she leads her life.

I think you may have hit the nail on the head here.
[/quote]
 
Ellen Marie:
Sorry to edit your message so much, but this summarizes my question. My question is, why does she worship God at all? I struggle to understand how it is that people make up their own God, or how they believe that their “God” has been revealed to them. My somewhat flippant response has always been that “God created us; we don’t get to create Him.” So, when people don’t believe in the God of the Bible, how do they come to know their god?

Ellen
Ellen, you have raised a good point, and one I will address with her. She claims that we have historically “misunderstood”, “mistranslated”, and “misinterpreted” the Bible and therefore have “twisted” view what God really is. Remember that she’s a lesbian now, so of course she goes into a rant about the patristic oppression of women, etc etc. basically she rewrites it all. :banghead:

What I find interesting is that she continues to bother with Christianity at all. To me, that shows that somewhere deep down, she still KNOWS there is truth here. I have hope that she will continue to be drawn back to the truth. It does not help matters that her “partner” is a fallen away Catholic. 😦

Thanks for your response.
 
40.png
iguana27:
How does this friend explain Christ’s death on the cross? Does she deny that it was divinely ordained? Does she accept that Christ died for the salvation of the world?
She believes he was murdered, for no good reason, and that His death was unneccessary: God will save all men because He made us all and He loves us all, regardless of what we do with our lives. 😦
 
*Has anyone ever run up against this theory of a monster God demanding the death of His own child? *

I used to use this arguement all the time when I was an anti-Christian. No Protestant could ever successfully answer the arguement because of their faulty understanding of original sin.

Point out to her that death entered into to the world because of the sin of man, not because God desired that death should be in the world.

fix

She can’t accept that God allows sacrifice, because then she may have to accept that sacrifice is part of life and salvation. That would mean she would have to change the way she leads her life.

I don’t know if that is true for “Barb”, but it was true for me. C.S. Lewis’ *Mere Christiantiy * was the antidote for the poison of moral relativism that I had swallowed.
 
Relativism is the error of our times. In my mind, it always comes down to the point that most of us reject the truth because to accept the truth would mean giving up some sin.
 
I have been asked this question by a friend; what she said was, “Why would you want to worship a God who required a blood sacrifice before He granted forgiveness? What sort of a monster God is that?”

My answer might be:
God gave man the perfect gift of life, one without pain or death. Man destroyed that bond when he marred it with the blackness of sin. Why would God want to give us anything when we destroyed that beautiful familial bond?

Yet He did. Because He loved us, He kept giving us chances. We were the ones corrupt with sin, murdering one another, destroying what He built. Sacrifices done in faith to God cleansed our sins. Yet the covenant was still broken and only one thing would repair it. In accepting what God asked her, Mary, in perfect obedience, began the process of our final repair to the broken relationship. Jesus, in his perfect sacrifice, finished it. Jesus, the sacrificial lamb, established a new covenant, one in which the gift of the Holy Spirit was given to unite us once again to God. Like blood ties, the Holy Spirit unites us like family. There are no more blood sacrifices after the perfect sacrifice, Jesus. (Note that none of his bones were ever broken, another requisite for a perfect sacrifice).

Does your friend believe in Christ Jesus? That he died on the cross for our sins? Then, if she does, she too, adheres to the belief of sacrifice. WHY does she believe this happened? She might not have an answer for YOU.
 
40.png
Makerteacher:
Ellen, you have raised a good point, and one I will address with her. She claims that we have historically “misunderstood”, “mistranslated”, and “misinterpreted” the Bible and therefore have “twisted” view what God really is. Remember that she’s a lesbian now, so of course she goes into a rant about the patristic oppression of women, etc etc. basically she rewrites it all.
May I suggest that you treat this friend very gently. From what you have written about her, I have the strong sense that you are not going to argue her into the Church. You might be able to love her into the Church, though. I am not a psychologist, but my reading and lectures from experts suggest that some people with her story are in a self-defense type mode. Often (by no means all, I don’t mean to generalize!), they have had trouble with relationships with men, especially their fathers. This interferes with their ability to see God as a loving Father and to accept that He loves them beyond what we could imagine. Be careful with some of the above posts that suggest that her choices are simply selfish or hedonist; failing to respect any pain that she might have experienced will just drive her farther away. I don’t want to go on and on. I just got a picture of her in my head as I read your posts that I wanted to share.

Ellen
 
Ellen Marie:
May I suggest that you treat this friend very gently. From what you have written about her, I have the strong sense that you are not going to argue her into the Church. You might be able to love her into the Church, though. Often (by no means all, I don’t mean to generalize!), they have had trouble with relationships with men, especially their fathers. This interferes with their ability to see God as a loving Father and to accept that He loves them beyond what we could imagine.
You are very insightful. She was indeed abused as a young girl by male relatives. I do not doubt this is a large part of where she is now. I have complete agreement with not arguing her into the Church. I do want to be able to answer the questions she raises, lovingly.

Thanks again for all the wonderful replies, this forum has been a great help to me. Now I can at least begin to address her “monster God” accusation. God reward you all 100-fold!
 
40.png
Trinitatem:
My answer might be:
God gave man the perfect gift of life, one without pain or death. Man destroyed that bond when he marred it with the blackness of sin. Why would God want to give us anything when we destroyed that beautiful familial bond?

Yet He did. Because He loved us, He kept giving us chances. We were the ones corrupt with sin, murdering one another, destroying what He built. Sacrifices done in faith to God cleansed our sins. Yet the covenant was still broken and only one thing would repair it. In accepting what God asked her, Mary, in perfect obedience, began the process of our final repair to the broken relationship. Jesus, in his perfect sacrifice, finished it. Jesus, the sacrificial lamb, established a new covenant, one in which the gift of the Holy Spirit was given to unite us once again to God. Like blood ties, the Holy Spirit unites us like family. There are no more blood sacrifices after the perfect sacrifice, Jesus. (Note that none of his bones were ever broken, another requisite for a perfect sacrifice).
:amen:

I think this is the best response to the question I’ve seen. I might add one other thought. Your friend’s comment about a bloodthirsty God also reveals a misunderstanding of the nature of the Trinity. Isn’t it fair to say that our God did not simply demand the death of his Son, but that in fact our God laid down His own life for our salvation, since it is true that we are talking about one God in three Persons, one of whom is the Son, Jesus Christ?

Tempus Fugit Memento Mori
 
40.png
Makerteacher:
I have been asked this question by a friend; what she said was, “Why would you want to worship a God who required a blood sacrifice before He granted forgiveness? What sort of a monster God is that?”

I tried to explain about the balance between His perfect love and mercy, and His perfect justice and righteousness, but I bungled it badly. :o She ended up shaking her head and rolling her eyes. She attends an extremely liberal Episcopalian church that welcomes same sex couples and has a female minister, etc etc.

I’d greatly appreciate any thoughts from the board members.

This friend, by the way, is steeped in mortal sin and could really use prayers from any who are willing. Let’s call her Barb for the purposes of this prayer request.
I understand that the reason our God wanted the sacrafice of lamb, calf, etc was because of the golden idols that were made at various times, such as when Moses was on the mount receiving the tablets with the laws on them. It was to show their willingness to give up their idols which were usually a calf or animal of some sort.
maggiec
I will add “Barb” to my daily rosary.
 
Ellen Marie:
May I suggest that you treat this friend very gently. From what you have written about her, I have the strong sense that you are not going to argue her into the Church. You might be able to love her into the Church, though. I am not a psychologist, but my reading and lectures from experts suggest that some people with her story are in a self-defense type mode. Often (by no means all, I don’t mean to generalize!), they have had trouble with relationships with men, especially their fathers. This interferes with their ability to see God as a loving Father and to accept that He loves them beyond what we could imagine. Be careful with some of the above posts that suggest that her choices are simply selfish or hedonist; failing to respect any pain that she might have experienced will just drive her farther away. I don’t want to go on and on. I just got a picture of her in my head as I read your posts that I wanted to share.

Ellen
I think you make a very good point. We always need to be charitable. Certainly, abuse is common in people’s pasts. We should be sensitive to such things. No one can argue anyone into the Church. Only the Holy Spirit can convert a heart.

With that said, I, also, must say that too often many people are simply hedonistic and hard hearted. For too long, folks in the Church have adopted a stance that only accentuate God’s mercy and never speak of God’s justice or our obligations to learn and follow the truth. IMO, we are where we are today in the Church specifically because too many have completely hijacked the truth in favor of a mamby bamby god who is a happy-go-lucky pal who endorses every choice we make no matter what.

So, a balance is needed. The pendulum has swung to far to the left. We need to speak the Truth with charity. We need to pray to God before we tell some what we think they should do or before explaining God’s love for us.

Yes, be kind to you those who are seeking the truth, just do not tolerate error or compromise the truth.
 
I have a friend who has the same objection.

**Didi’s **response here is similar to how I approached it.

From the point of view of love between two people, when you really love someone, you love them for their own sake. In that moment you are willing to do what is good for that person within your power, even at a cost to yourself.
That is the definition of sacrifice.

But you cannot have love without free will. It is contained in the very concept of love. Love is always freely chosen.

God is good, all good. She accepts that. Yet by looking around we see that we are not all good. Some people kill, rape, abuse, etc. Jesus taught us that such actions come from the seed of hate that is in the heart. So we can see that all of us have at least the seed of that which is not good.

So there is a gulf between us and God. Could God just speak the word and change us? Certainly. But what would that do? It would negate our free will. We would have no choice. So what?

Well, we have seen already that to love requires free will. And what does God want of us? Jesus told us on which hangs all the law and the prophets. God wants us to love Him, with heart, soul and mind. He wants us to love Him for his own sake, of our own free will. So that is why He will not force us.

She would also accept that God loves us. Let’s look at that. We know that to love us for our own sake, God would be willing to do anything in His power for our good. That again is the definition of sacrifice. What is the ultimate one can do out of total self-sacrificing love? Jesus told us that as well. No greater love has any man than that he lay down his life for a friend.

Thus, the greatest thing that God could do out of love for us for our own sake is to lay down is life for us. And that He did, in the person of Jesus, and more than that He confined Himself to a human body to do it. Jesus, the Word, the second person of the trinity, volunteered for the job. God then, reached out to us in total self-sacrificing love to bridge the gap between us, even before we as Christians freely responded to that love in return, in the faith that we would respond. Now that’s love.

And sacrifice is an integral part of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top