God's Omnipresence; A Meditation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linusthe2nd
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Linusthe2nd

Guest
How often do you think of God’s presence in his creation. It is worth meditating about because he is present by his causality, his sustaining and provident power and guidance, by his very essence and Substance to every square centimeter of his creation. The Catechism explains it paragraphs 300,301. Linked before.

For you love all things that exist, and detest none of the things that you have made; for you would not have made anything if you had hated it. How would anything have endured, if you had not willed it? Or how would anything not called forth by you have been preserved? You spare all things, for they are yours, O Lord, you who love the living.160 "

" THE VATICAN COUNCIL 1869-1870

Ecumenical XX (on Faith and the Church)

SESSION III (April 24, 1870)

Dogmatic Constitution concerning the Catholic Faith *

Chap. 1. God, Creator of All Things

1782 [The one, living, and true God and His distinction from all things.] * The holy, Catholic, Apostolic, Roman Church believes and confesses that there is one, true, living God, Creator and Lord of heaven and earth, omnipotent, eternal, immense, incomprehensible, infinite in intellect and will, and in every perfection; who, although He is one, singular, altogether simple and unchangeable spiritual substance, must be proclaimed distinct in reality and essence from the world; most blessed in Himself and of Himself, and ineffably most high above all things which are or can be conceived outside Himself [can. 1-4].

1783 The act of creation in itself, and in opposition to modern errors, and the effect of creation] . This sole true God by His goodness and “omnipotent power,” not to increase His own beatitude, and not to add to, but to manifest His perfection by the blessings which He bestows on creatures, with most free volition, “immediately from the beginning of time fashioned each creature out of nothing, spiritual and corporeal, namely angelic and mundane; and then the human creation, common as it were, composed of both spirit and body” [Lateran Council IV, see n. 428; can. 2 and 5]

1784 [The result of creation] .But God protects and governs by His providence all things which He created, “reaching from end to end mightily and ordering all things sweetly” [cf. Wisd. 8:1]. For “all things are naked and open to His eyes” Heb. 4:13], even those which by the free action of creatures are in the future.

onetruecatholicfaith.com/Roman-Catholic-Dogma.php?id=39&title=Denzinger+1700±+1799&page=2

Ludwig Ott, in Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma says, " God is everywhere present in created space. " ( De Fide )

Thomas Aquinas explains it speculatively as follows.

" On the contrary, A thing is wherever it operates. But God operates in all things, according to Isaiah 26:12, “Lord . . . Thou hast wrought all our works in [Vulgate: ‘for’] us.” Therefore God is in all things.

I answer that, God is in all things; not, indeed, as part of their essence, nor as an accident, but as an agent is present to that upon which it works. For an agent must be joined to that wherein it acts immediately and touch it by its power… Now since God is very being by His own essence, created being must be His proper effect… Now God causes this effect in things not only when they first begin to be, but as long as they are preserved in being… Therefore as long as a thing has being, God must be present to it, according to its mode of being. But being is innermost in each thing and most fundamentally inherent in all things since it is formal in respect of everything found in a thing, as was shown above (Question 7, Article 1). Hence it must be that God is in all things, and innermostly. " ( S.T. 1, q 8, a 1 )

" I answer that, Since place is a thing, to be in place can be understood in a twofold sense; either by way of other things–i.e. as one thing is said to be in another no matter how; and thus the accidents of a place are in place; or by a way proper to place; and thus things placed are in a place. Now in both these senses, in some way God is in every place; and this is to be everywhere.

First, as He is in all things giving them being, power and operation; so He is in every place as giving it existence and locative power. Again, things placed are in place, inasmuch as they fill place; and God fills every place; not, indeed, like a body, for a body is said to fill place inasmuch as it excludes the co-presence of another body; whereas by God being in a place, others are not thereby excluded from it; indeed, by the very fact that He gives being to the things that fill every place, He Himself fills every place. " ( S.T. 1, q 8, a 2 )

" On the contrary, A gloss on the Canticle of Canticles (5) says that, “God by a common mode is in all things by His presence, power and substance; still He is said to be present more familiarly in some by grace” [The quotation is from St. Gregory, (Hom. viii in Ezech.)].

I answer that, God is said to be in a thing in two ways; in one way after the manner of an efficient cause; and thus He is in all things created by Him; in another way he is in things as the object of operation is in the operator; and this is proper to the operations of the soul, according as the thing known is in the one who knows; and the thing desired in the one desiring. In this second way God is especially in the rational creature which knows and loves Him actually or habitually. And because the rational creature possesses this prerogative by grace, as will be shown later (12). He is said to be thus in the saints by grace. " ( S.T. 1, q 8, a 3 )

Here is an excellent meditation on God’s presence from Scripture, taken from a non-Catholic source. There is one anti-Catholic comment, but the rest is excellent and worth reading. tecmalta.org/tft138.htm

Pax
Linus2nd
 
I may have to stop reading your posts, Linus. This one has some elegant use of words but it illuminates not at all.
 
I may have to stop reading your posts, Linus. This one has left me feeling curiously sad. The quotations have some elegant phrases, but it illuminates not at all.
 
I may have to stop reading your posts, Linus. This one has some elegant use of words but it illuminates not at all.
The post has two purposes. It is a reminder to the faithful of what Divine Omnipresence means and to encourage them to think about this great truth.

However, I did include the reasons Thomas gives in defense of this great truth. I’m sorry that this part did not help you.

Linus2nd
 
I believe this is the first mention of meditating on analytic philosophy that I have come across.
 
I believe this is the first mention of meditating on analytic philosophy that I have come across.
But it isn’t just philosophy, though there is nothing wrong with meditating on what Thomas says here. It mirrors the Church’s own teaching and kind of fills in some of the blanks. To think that God Almighty is present, by his very essence and substance. in every cell, atom, etc of our being is awsome. But he is present, as Thomas points out, as the direct cause of the act of existence he has given us. And if he should withdraw his hand for a moment, we would cease to exist. That is worth meditating on.

Pax
Linus2nd
 
It’s nice “head knowledge”, but it doesn’t help someone who’s hurting, and it’s not addressed to a skeptic or one struggling with faith. It only serves to add nuance to one’s praise.
 
But it isn’t just philosophy, though there is nothing wrong with meditating on what Thomas says here. It mirrors the Church’s own teaching and kind of fills in some of the blanks. To think that God Almighty is present, by his very essence and substance. in every cell, atom, etc of our being is awsome. But he is present, as Thomas points out, as the direct cause of the act of existence he has given us. And if he should withdraw his hand for a moment, we would cease to exist. That is worth meditating on.

Pax
Linus2nd
There is a difference between contemplation and meditation. In contemplation there is an object or principle that one focuses on. In meditation, however, there is no object or thought that one focuses on. Thoughts and images come and go, but they are ignored. The idea is to get beyond them.

But what I meant by my comment was that an understanding of the philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas requires the use of the intellect rather than meditation (or contemplation, if that was what was meant). One of course could contemplate on God’s omnipresence, but doing so is not the same thing as studying the writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas. That is very different.
 
There is a difference between contemplation and meditation. In contemplation there is an object or principle that one focuses on. In meditation, however, there is no object or thought that one focuses on. Thoughts and images come and go, but they are ignored. The idea is to get beyond them.

But what I meant by my comment was that an understanding of the philosophy of Saint Thomas Aquinas requires the use of the intellect rather than meditation (or contemplation, if that was what was meant). One of course could contemplate on God’s omnipresence, but doing so is not the same thing as studying the writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas. That is very different.
The quotations from Thomas were meant merely to illustrate how intimate God’s presence is to our very being, that his presence by substance permates every cell or our bodies and our souls in a special way. I think we can either contemplate or meditate on that presence.

Linus2nd
 
The quotations from Thomas were meant merely to illustrate how intimate God’s presence is to our very being, that his presence by substance permates every cell or our bodies and our souls in a special way. I think we can either contemplate or meditate on that presence.

Linus2nd
Yes, a person could definitely contemplate on God’s omnipresence.

Seriously, take another look at 1782 [The one living, and true God and his distinction from all things.] of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which you quoted in your original comment. It states that God “must be proclaimed distinct in reality and essence from the world…”
 
Yes, a person could definitely contemplate on God’s omnipresence.

Seriously, take another look at 1782 [The one living, and true God and his distinction from all things.] of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which you quoted in your original comment. It states that God “must be proclaimed distinct in reality and essence from the world…”
And is there a problem there? If there is I don’t see it.

Linus2nd
 
No, I would say there is no problem and no harm. It is in essence a theological question involving the Catholic belief that God is distinct from His Creation. But I don’t believe that contemplating God’s omnipresence could be wrong. God indeed created the world, and a contemplation of this is good, I think. May peace be with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top