Going to the Eastern rites in the 60s/70s

  • Thread starter Thread starter valoriuslobo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
V

valoriuslobo

Guest
Hello,

I was born in the 80’s so I don’t know what the 60’s were like, but I’ve heard from people and read online that after the liturgical changes pursuant to Sancrosantum Concilium (sp?) that adherents of the Tridentine Mass sometimes started going to the Uniate/Eastern Catholic rites. I’ve never figured out why this was. Did anyone hear do that, and if do, why?
 
I do this at present, as do a few other Catholics I know who aren’t Slavic or Eastern in heritage. I live in the 1st or 2nd least-Catholic state in the U.S.A., so there’s no hint of the EF for about a hundred mile radius around our town, and the few parishes around are very “New Springtime,” if you understand my meaning.
 
Hello,

I was born in the 80’s so I don’t know what the 60’s were like, but I’ve heard from people and read online that after the liturgical changes pursuant to Sancrosantum Concilium (sp?) that adherents of the Tridentine Mass sometimes started going to the Uniate/Eastern Catholic rites. I’ve never figured out why this was. Did anyone hear do that, and if do, why?
First, I think I should point out that the U**** word is banned from this site. Why that should be is not for me to say, but just so you are careful …

Also, the Eastern Catholics are now organized into ‘churches’, so the term ‘rites’ is not often used. Since you are talking about liturgies in a general sense, the term rites is probably correct.

The reason many people started attending the Eastern Catholic churches (in their many varieties) was because there were no indult Masses, at all, anywhere. There was no expectation that there would be an indult for what is now called the EF. For almost all people it was gone and inaccessable.

The Eastern Catholic Churches (actually, ‘rites’ at the time) had a generally more reverent liturgy which was appealing to many people. However, these ‘rites’ were not well understood by the majority of the laity, many of whom probably thought these were not really Catholic, so the phenomena was not an enormous shift of people at the time.

As the SSPX started to have a presence, some people who visited the EC went that way, and when the indult Masses were introduced in some places as a response to the SSPX, some people went that way. Then too, some went through the Eastern Catholic churches and on into Holy Orthodoxy, but it is still possible even today to run into people who started to attend Eastern Catholic parishes in the 1960’s and never left.

For their part, the Eastern Catholics needed the support, but the large number of Latin Catholics in some of those small parishes did cause some other problems.
 
I didn’t mean any offense. I had read a book about the Eastern Catholic Churches that used the word Uniate, so I didn’t understand it was no longer appropriate to use. Now I know.
 
Uniate was used by Pope Leo XIII amongst many others. It can still be used. This forum does not nor cannot override what a holy pope has permitted.

Joe
 
Uniate was used by Pope Leo XIII amongst many others. It can still be used. This forum does not nor cannot override what a holy pope has permitted.

Joe
The moderators have final say here, from whom there is no recourse. 😃

Seriously though, I have been warned about this in the past. Eastern Catholics do not like the term, and yes it appears in many church documents, I have made the same argument.

It does not matter, the term is not welcomed by Eastern Catholics and should not be used in reference to them. It is the ‘N’ word of Eastern Catholicism (although when I was an EC, coming from a Latin background, it did not bother me at first, it does bother many others).

As a matter of fact, there is a popular Orthodox forum that has also banned the term for the same reason.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top