M
migueltojose
Guest
I’ve considered that maybe good and evil are derived from right and wrong or good behavior versus bad behavior. Is it conceivable that good and evil don’t really exist in and of themselves but are derivitives?
Well, IMO right and wrong really don’t have much meaning apart from the concept of good and evil. In Christianity moral evil (sin) is opposition to the will of God, the creator of human morality, aka the “natural law”.I’ve considered that maybe good and evil are derived from right and wrong or good behavior versus bad behavior. Is it conceivable that good and evil don’t really exist in and of themselves but are derivitives?
Why does its being a human invention, as opposed to a divine ordinance, make morality relative?Well, IMO right and wrong really don’t have much meaning apart from the concept of good and evil. In Christianity moral evil (sin) is opposition to the will of God, the creator of human morality, aka the “natural law”.
The question is, Is morality relative, IOW a purely human invention, or absolute, an invention of God?
Good and evil are adjectives, not nouns. As a description of some action they make sense. Trying to turn them into stand-alone entities is an error of reification.I’ve considered that maybe good and evil are derived from right and wrong or good behavior versus bad behavior. Is it conceivable that good and evil don’t really exist in and of themselves but are derivitives?
Well, if its an invention its changeable. What standard, other than prevailing opinion of the majority, would set the norm?Why does its being a human invention, as opposed to a divine ordinance, make morality relative?
Rossum:Good and evil are adjectives, not nouns. As a description of some action they make sense. Trying to turn them into stand-alone entities is an error of reification.
rossum
By convention we call this or that evil or bad if it lacks a perfection which we think it should have. Even in morality we call that act bad which lacks goodness.I’ve considered that maybe good and evil are derived from right and wrong or good behavior versus bad behavior. Is it conceivable that good and evil don’t really exist in and of themselves but are derivitives?
Perhaps, if you believe that evil/wrong is the opposite of good/right - counterparts so-to-speak. I don’t think that’s an accurate description/definition.I’ve considered that maybe good and evil are derived from right and wrong or good behavior versus bad behavior. Is it conceivable that good and evil don’t really exist in and of themselves but are derivitives?
Genesis 2:18 Then the LORD God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.”Perhaps, if you believe that evil/wrong is the opposite of good/right - counterparts so-to-speak. I don’t think that’s an accurate description/definition.
After God created the heavens and the earth he said “it was good” and after creating humans God said “very good”. I guess what I’m trying to say is that only good exists and evil should be thought of in terms as a willful failure to do good.
No rational conclusion can be established on isolated snippets from the Bible!Genesis 2:18 Then the LORD God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.”
Isaiah 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
Amos 3:6 Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?
(emphases added)
No rational conclusion can be established on the entire Bible either, since it contains contradictions. It is essential to take smaller sections that do not contain contradictions in order to gain anything of any use.No rational conclusion can be established on isolated snippets from the Bible!
Your post isn’t within the context established by the OP.Genesis 2:18 Then the LORD God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.”
Isaiah 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
Amos 3:6 Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?
(emphases added)
rossum
If there is no objective universal standard of moral perfection, then human morality is simply what happens to be convenient to the individual. It might be convenient to me to manipulate or kill another human being if I know that I can get away with it. For a person who is afraid of the consequences it is convenient for that person to conform to societal norms. There is no rational reason to feel guilty about any action; you need only be sad that you got caught. Moral Guilt is just a delusion in a world where humans invent their own standards.Why does its being a human invention, as opposed to a divine ordinance, make morality relative?