V
vern_humphrey
Guest
Dr Paul:
And yes, there are some disadvantages to having a limited number of lines – but until there is more evidence that embryonic stem cells can be controlled, there is no justification to rush to judgement, even if you aren’t convinced it is morally wrong.
Most of the people I see beating the drum for more lines of federally-funded embryonic stem cells aren’t scientists at all, but “activists” of one stripe or another.While I respect your opinion, I clearly disagree with your speculation about the motives of these well-intentioned yet misdirected scientists. I can only speak from my own experience, but I do not see any conscious intention of these investigators to further the abortion industry even though pursuit of such studies clearly does weaken the respect for the dignity of all human life.
If you read the peer reviewed scientific literature, there are valid reasons for the inadequacy of current embryonic stem cell lines. While this does not morally justify the creation of NEW embryonic stem cell lines, it does provide an understandable (albeit morally problematic) motivation.
And yes, there are some disadvantages to having a limited number of lines – but until there is more evidence that embryonic stem cells can be controlled, there is no justification to rush to judgement, even if you aren’t convinced it is morally wrong.