R
Rau
Guest
The majority only get to bring about their position on matters within the scope of the majority to decide. A majority of US citizens can’t decide the dress code to apply at a specific golf club in Arkansas. The majority of US citizens can’t require a baker to produce double choc cinnamon roles with custard. The majority does have a democratic right to decide whether the State will recognise same sex marriages - if not the majority, how should the matter be decided? The majority would have the democratic right to determine that any party authorised by the State to perform civil marriages cannot pick and choose for whom they do it - but I guess this could be a somewhat arbitrary requirement, and may be counter-productive from the State’s perspective and from the perspective of all who wish a Church wedding. Exercising democracy in this way, on these issues is not itself immoral, though that says nothing about the morality of the subject matter. Eg. The majority may decide that abortion is legal. That decision process is not immoral, but abortion is.So if Catholics are in a minority, and the majority feel that homosexual couples should be allowed to marry, does that mean that the majority have the moral right (not just the ability) to force Catholics to carry out same sex marriages?
Or do you think that in this instance the majority should think about whether they have the right (or any need) to impose their opinion on the minority? Not just what their opinion on same sex marriage is?
So should you be thinking not just about whether you think gays should be marry, but also whether you should impose that opinion on (for example) the Quakers?
No one is imposing when the State applies “majority rules” on matters that the State is granted authority by the people to rule on. It is up to the State to choose (or not) to deem same sex unions in need of or deserving of recognition, and presumably it will do that if / when the majority concur. That is a reasonable democratic process, and we all are entitled to contribute a view so the State can decide.