A
ALISANDRO
Guest
Hi Brother JR. OSF., I don’t know off-hand the location (one of the Gospels ) where it says that when our Lord dismissed His spirit there was darkness over the whole land for the space of three hours. It would not have been a significant statement to make if our Saviour had died after sunset, so your statement above is borne out, Christ did die before the evening arrived. Another point that I am sure that you could clarify for me :- the first Passover was celebrated in Egypt on the eve of the end of the 400yrs captivity, yes? Did God instruct the Children of Israel at that time to keep celebrating that Passover throughout their generations on that same day, the 14th of Abib, (April) ? If so, what day of the week did 14th April fall on in the year of our Lord’s crucifiction. If it was Thursday, it would certainly end the controversy in some quarters where it is said that Christ was not in the tomb for three days and three nights. Because the Jews reckoned any part of a day as a whole day, it would then follow that our Lord was crucified on Friday morning, died on the cross about the third hour of the day, was in the tomb for the rest of Friday, all of the Sabbath and rose on the third day which was Sunday, is all of that correct Brother?Actually we do know. Passover lasted an entire week. It began on what we would call Palm Sunday and ended that Saturday. That’s why there was such a large crowd of Jews in Jerusalem that week. It was Passover Week.
We have to remember that John’s Gospel was not intended to be a historical presentation of Jesus. John’s intent is to show that Jesus is the promised Messiah by offering proofs. John organizes his material according to his theme. That’s why John’s Gospel does ot fit the Synoptics. It has two very interesting things happening simultaneously. First, there is John’s attempt to prove that Jesus is the Messiah. Second, (not intended) is John’s mystical understanding of Jesus.
Unlike the other writers, John is a mystic. He presents us a theological Jesus. He’s not itnerested in the historical fact as much as he is interested in the significance of Jesus in salvation history. What was the significance of Jesus? His Messiahship.
This does not mean that John is historically wrong. Not at all. What it means is that John only uses those points of history that prove the Messiahship of Christ. Anything else about Christ, John leaves out, because by the time that he writes his Gospel, everything that can be said about Christ’s life has been said by the Synoptic writers. He’s not interested in repeating the same story.
The day of preparation would be accurate as well as Passover Day. Because in ancient Judaism, the celebration was always at the Seder, which took place at the evening meel. From John’s perspective, Jesus dies before the Passover.
He deliberately does this to point out to the fact that Jesus is truly a faithful Jew. He does the work of salvation without violating the Jewish law. He dies before the evening arrives
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF![]()
Christian regards, ALISANDRO.