L
LilyM
Guest
It’s ok - for future reference you can try hitting the ‘edit’ button and deleting one of the posts.Please excuse the double post.
And yes, in Catholic liturgical parlance and Canon Law ‘illicit’ and ‘invalid’ do have distinct meanings. ‘Invalid’ means proceedings are SO irregular that the sacrament is basically entirely null and void and without effect. ‘Illicit’ is a lesser irregularity that doesn’t affect whether the sacrament has truly happened.
To give one example - a Mass where the priest used a glass chalice instead of the prescribed precious metal would be illicit, but nonetheless a real and effectual Mass. A Mass where the priest failed to enact the core of the sacrament by failing to say the words ‘this is my Body’ and ‘this is my Blood’ would be invalid - null and void, with no effect at all.