Graves Opened after Jesus Died?

  • Thread starter Thread starter savedbychrist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

savedbychrist

Guest
Matthew 27:52-53 recorded:
And the graves were opened: and many bodies of the saints that had slept arose, And coming out of the tombs after his resurrection, came into the holy city, and appeared to many.

I have always thought that resurrection of the body will happen at the Second Coming of Christ. How do we explain that the tombs were opened and the bodies of the saints arose after Jesus died? Was this bodily resurrection, or was it something else?
 
People were also brought back from the dead in the Old Testament, such as from miracles performed through Elisha, who receives a double portion of grace and is a prefigure of Christ. The apostles Peter & Paul each also brought somebody back from the dead.

The difference is that the people brought back to life after the Resurrection of Jesus wouldn’t have had glorified bodies. The glorified body is given after the General Judgment.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08552a.htm

Peace.
 
Last edited:
The difference is that the people brought back to life after the Resurrection of Jesus wouldn’t have had glorified bodies. The glorified body is given after the General Judgment.
“the people brought back to life after the Resurrection of Jesus” – this event must have been shocking, intriguing, terrifying, perplexing. They were seen by many, and for some time.

Jesus told Mary Magdalene not to touch Him, as He had not yet ascended to the Father (not yet been glorified). Those who came to life did not have glorified bodies; did they return to their graves, is this recorded?
 
It doesn’t say what happens after the people were raised from the dead but either way they would have lived out their lives until it was time for them to die. The historical fiction Ben Hur is based on these events. Jesus and Mary are the only two people dogmatically known to have their bodies in Heaven.

People coming back from the dead happens on several occasions in the Bible and there are also accounts in legends of saints bringing people back from the dead. It’s a miracle of course but what makes the Resurrection different and so important is that Jesus has a glorified body that never dies or decays and it’s a promise of the life to come. Other people brought back to life are still bound to age and die.
 
Last edited:
My guess is that they followed Jesus to wherever He went with his glorified body. They are the witnesses to the resurrected Christ, that Christ’s body wasn’t taken away by the apostles and then fabricated some unbelievable story of a resurrection.
 
IMO it was a temporary miracle to show God’s power and glory. Probably saints from the OT that witnessed to the truth then went back to their graves. Otherwise we would hear more about them in Acts or the Epistles.
 
Matthew 27:52-53 recorded:
And the graves were opened: and many bodies of the saints that had slept arose, And coming out of the tombs after his resurrection, came into the holy city, and appeared to many.

I have always thought that resurrection of the body will happen at the Second Coming of Christ.
Lots of questions to ask, here! That passage is inherently confusing. Let’s take a quick look at it:

Among the events of Good Friday:
  • the veil of the sanctuary was torn in two
  • the earth quaked
  • rocks were split
  • tombs were opened
  • the bodies of many saints who had fallen asleep were raised
Now… something weird happens in the narrative at this point. The evangelist stops talking about Good Friday, and moves on to some things that happened later.

“After [Jesus’] resurrection”, these things happened:
  • they [the dead saints] entered the holy city
  • they appeared to many
(Then we go back to Good Friday and see the centurion’s response to the events going on at that time.)

But, there are so many questions to ask! Let’s look at the Good Friday event:
  • the earthquake caused tombs to be opened.
  • bodies were raised.
Remember that the burial custom of those days was to bury a body and then come back after some time had elapsed, so that the bones could be collected and placed into a (small) ossuary. That’s what would have remained of the “bodies of the saints”! So, it’s not too difficult to imagine that, due to the earthquake, some tombs were flung open and the bones of the dead were exposed.

The important thing to remember, though, is this: that’s all that the evangelist says happened on Good Friday. No mass ‘resurrection event.’

So, what about the rest of the passage – verse 53? Let’s look at it:
  • this happened “after his resurrection”. Lots of questions:
    • when? is this something from Easter Sunday? Another day? Is it a mass event, happening all at once, or are we talking about part of the general case of the dead in Christ rising to new life after they die, at the times of their deaths? We just don’t know.
  • “they entered the holy city”:
    • where? Is this Jerusalem? Or is it God’s “heavenly city” (i.e., heaven)? Is this a reference to the eternal life won by Christ, which all the saints inherit?
  • “appeared to many”
    • to whom? Christians? Residents of Jerusalem?
    • where? did they appear “in the holy city” (which might not be all that much of an ‘appearance’ if the holy city is heaven!)? did they appear among the people (i.e., on the way to the holy city)?
    • in what fashion? Did they appear physically to people, and if so, as bones? Did they appear as a vision?
So… many, many questions abound. Non-believers will often point to these verses as a proof-text that the gospel accounts are fake (after all, they insist, a mass resurrection event would certainly have been noticed, and definitely been recorded by Jews or Romans in Jerusalem). But, as you can see, the account doesn’t say what we might think at first blush it’s asserting…
 
The Cornelius A. Lapide Biblical Commentary gives good commentary on this verse. Among other things, it addresses the question of whether those resurrected had to die again, and gives the varying opinions of some early Church fathers. Augustine held they did, but many others held that they did not (Origen, St. Jerome, St. Clement of Alexandria).
Here’s the link to his commentary on Chapter 27 of Matthew’s gospel. You’ll need to scroll almost to the bottom to get to verse 52.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top