R
rcwitness
Guest
Both should be pastoral, and both should work in harmony.
Often, no, he can’t. Oh, a married person has deep personal experience with his own lived situation… but an experienced priest who is a good counselor has experience with the full range of marital situations. Moreover, he’s not ensconced in any one situation, so there’s no risk that he’d project his experience on the spouses. Finally, he’s an objective voice, which can be quite valuable in this scenario.No of course not, but can a married person better understand t he struggles in marriage than a celibate priest?
Yes, I think this does proceed from your personal experience.Who knows, it may be my personal bias a formerly married priest of some kind needs to be the defender of the Bond.
I agree. Or at least this should be the ideal, when the pastor approaches the situation focussing on the moral aspects which are founded on the Teachings of the Catholic faith.Often, no, he can’t. Oh, a married person has deep personal experience with his own lived situation… but an experienced priest who is a good counselor has experience with the full range of marital situations. Moreover, he’s not ensconced in any one situation, so there’s no risk that he’d project his experience on the spouses. Finally, he’s an objective voice, which can be quite valuable in this scenario.
The judge in the tribunal in my diocese is a deacon who has been married for 47 years. He will meet with either party if requested.You spend one hour giving an oral testimony to the Tribunal or send off what most say is 50 at least pages of testimony to a bunch of Tribunal priests who have never been married nor met you to decide your future.
The pastor is only to be concerned with the moral issues of the faithful. What the Church Teaches about this matter or that matter. Help members understand how the moral Teachings apply in the matters.
Yep. That’s why the ‘statistic’ about “90%+ of annulments being granted” is a straw man…Yes but it’s not always so. My priest would not file the annulment for his thoughts were that most likely the marriage was valid.
Yes. Thanks for asking.Have you ever been involved in an annulment proceeding?
I’m sorry to hear that. It makes the things you’re asserting make more sense, now.I could not find a an experienced priest who is a good counselor with the full range of marital experiences.
Why, because things are so healthy as they are?I’m glad you aren’t involved in the formation of priests.![]()
Well, they’ll get no more healthy if we tell priests “please stay in your glass bubble; your role is simply to teach morality and stay out of all other ministries.”Why, because things are so healthy as they are?