D
doanli
Guest
But I want to meet my guardian angel!As our guardian angel is only with us from conception to death I guess they are either reassigned upon conception of a new life or return to Heaven.
But I want to meet my guardian angel!As our guardian angel is only with us from conception to death I guess they are either reassigned upon conception of a new life or return to Heaven.
It would seem almost as natural, if not moreso , as wanting to meet some of the Saints…wouldn’t it ?But I want to meet my guardian angel!![]()
Only one of the people you cited is canonized.First, I did not say the Church requires us not to believe in private revelations. I said the Church does not require us to believe them. We are free to believe or not believe in any private revelation.
Second, the problem I have with inaccuracies/contradictions in “approved” private revelations is that for me it casts some doubt on everything being genuine.
I get much more out of the writings of people like Bishop Fulton Sheen than I do out of many of the “approved” private revelations and I can be assured a lot of rubbish is not being mixed in with any beneficial parts which makes the whole questionable.Only one of the people you cited is canonized.
I know you’re repeating what others have said about these people and their revelations but I think it would be more fair to go to the actual sources than the commentary in such a case, and not criticize so lightly.
All of these writings contain so much of potentially great benefit, approached properly, I think your approach is rather too negative.
…Anne Emmerich said 3 nails were used and Jesus was nailed to the cross while it was still on the ground.
St Bridget said 4 nails were used and Jesus was nailed to the cross while it was upright and in place…
I think I may have been one who reaped a measure of the potential benefit of those writings. At the same time , maybe I could shed some light on some of the potential damage that thistle is hinting at.Only one of the people you cited is canonized.
I know you’re repeating what others have said about these people and their revelations but I think it would be more fair to go to the actual sources than the commentary in such a case, and not criticize so lightly.
All of these writings contain so much of potentially great benefit, approached properly, I think your approach is rather too negative.
Yes, they can and do intervene in the material world. The demons tempt us, the guardian angels urge virtue and resistant to temptation. Every guardian angel is different, none is equal to the other. (no human being is equal to another either, but the angels are far more diverse)Since we are talking about Guardian Angels anyway, I’d like to add a question to the forum. What are our Guardian Angels capable of doing? Other than praying for us, how, exactly, do they protect us? Can they and do they intervene in the material world such as changing the trajectory of a crashing vehicle so that it will miss us instead of hitting us? Do they “fight” with demon’s who are trying to tempt us and if so how? Are all guardian angels created equally powerful? Are some weaker than others? Can some fend off demons better than others, etc… are there any Church writings on any speculation about these specifics? If not what are your opinions. Thanks and God bless,
NeedImprovement said:It has been quite a while since I read “My Way of Life” cited in my previous post. I have the book in front of me now and there is a considerable amount of good stuff in section on angels. However, my paraphrase was lacking in accuracy. Here is what the book actually has printed in it:
[pg 67] “Not even a child is puzzled about how an angel gets its clothes on over such huge wings ; for it is clear the wings we give to angels are a symbol and nothing more…” *
The book is entitled “My Way of Life” ; Pocket Edition of St. Thomas , The Summa Simplified for Everyone; by Walter Farrel, O.P., S.T.M. , and Martin J. Healy, S.T.,© 1952 , Confraternity of the Precious Blood , .
Here are a couple of selected excerpts from the Chapter V section on The Angels:
[pg 65] “As in numbers, so in variety, the angelic world is a splendor that dims the variety of the physical world into a plainness approaching homely monotony. There are no angelic families or races ; each individual angel stands apart from all the others more distinctly different than an elephant from a fly. The pleasant individual differences we notice from man to man and woman to woman are as far from the differences between the angels as a ripple on a pond is from the towering power and smashing violence of a stormy sea. At each encounter in the heavenly courts, the angels see differences greater than those which distinguish a rose from a woman. Multiply this by the countless number of the angels; the heavenly choirs are a luminous image of divinity’s perfections stupendous in its beauty, staggering in its wide variety. Yet all this is no more than a foggy outline of the beauty of God…”
[pg 66] " Angels were not made to give life to bodies as were our human souls. The bodies in which they have appeared from time to time among us were the appearances of bodies taken on for our comfort ; not real, but apparent that we might the more easily accept the angel, his message, his companionship. None of the things that are proper to living bodies could be accomplished by these apparent bodies of the angels : they could not digest a meal, beget children, become tired, or wake refreshed from sleep … Its completely spiritual nature in its independence and power has no need of a body. It can get far more done than any strong man, indeed than any material force. It is free from the barriers that the physical inevitably imposes on our knowledge and our love. : free from the sluggishness, fatigue and distraction that makes our lifetime harvest of truth so skimpy…"
*Continuation of first quote cited in this post *[from pg 67] - " Not even a child is puzzled about how an angel gets its clothes on over such huge wings ; for it is clear the wings we give to angels are a symbol and nothing more. The swift flight of a bird contrasted with the trudging step of a man is a fitting symbol of smooth, untrammeled, rapid movement, and so a ceturies-old expression of the celerity of angelic passage. In our own times, we might appeal to the soundless swoop of a diving jet plane to help our stumbling minds to follow the flight of an angel ; we would come closer to reality by following with a flick of the eye the almost instantaneous thrust of lightning. We have the most accurate measurement of that angelic progress in the time it takes our own minds to jump from city to city, across oceans, over five, ten , or fifty years ; for it is thus that an angel moves…"
![]()

And what about babies aborted, most often naturally (God's doing?), or in abortion facilities?
And what about all the people who may survive but live in continual misery, hunger, depression, bitterness, chronic poor health, often abused, orphans, etc.?
Where are those Guardian Angels that should be protecting them?
As you can see, I have trouble believing in Guardian Angels. I regard the concept as suited to the mind of children, something that can provide them solace and courage.
However, I do believe in the eternal providence of God and leave the rest in His Divine Hands. I like the hymn whose first stanza reads: "Farther along we'll know all about it, farther along we'll understand why, cheer up my brother, live in the sunshine, we'll understand it all bye and bye."
I find there isn’t too much in the above-quoted post that I can agree with. I do find it unfortunate that some people don’t believe in the existence of their guardian Angels.Perhaps with time… always their prerogative though.If there are Guardian Angels, lots of them seem to fall asleep on the job,
Think of all the innocent people - millions of them devout Christians - who have been slaughtered in wars.
Think of others who die regularly of disease, in traffic accidents, from sudden heart attacks or strokes, and countless other causes.
Code:And what about babies aborted, most often naturally (God's doing?), or in abortion facilities? And what about all the people who may survive but live in continual misery, hunger, depression, bitterness, chronic poor health, often abused, orphans, etc.? Where are those Guardian Angels that should be protecting them? As you can see, I have trouble believing in Guardian Angels. I regard the concept as suited to the mind of children, something that can provide them solace and courage. However, I do believe in the eternal providence of God and leave the rest in His Divine Hands. I like the hymn whose first stanza reads: "Farther along we'll know all about it, farther along we'll understand why, cheer up my brother, live in the sunshine, we'll understand it all bye and bye."
You appear to be mixing two issues. Sickness and death are the consequences of sin – of the fall ; not because some guardian Angels are falling asleep on the job. I thought this view was commonly held by all Christians. I agree with your depiction in as far as it isn’t pretty and doesn’t seem just that millions are murdered in different ways, but this has to do with free will- the will of those who murder. A guardian Angel cannot act upon our will :… Think of all the innocent people - millions of them devout Christians - who have been slaughtered in wars … Think of others who die regularly of disease, in traffic accidents, from sudden heart attacks or strokes, and countless other causes…
I can’t say I’ve ever heard anyone – Christian or not, suggest that God is responsible for abortion.… And what about babies aborted, most often naturally (God’s doing?), or in abortion facilities?..
In part yes, in part no. Believing in the presence of one’s guardian Angel is not childish, but it does take a faith which is childlike [Matt 18:3] . We should try to maintain a childlike faith/trust in God throughout our entire lives…since Jesus himself taught us to call him Father.… I regard the concept as suited to the mind of children, something that can provide them solace and courage…