Canada had a registry and canned it because it was a waste of money. they have a small number of gun owners. why would we not want to learn from their experience?Obtaining it is a background check, although the record of the sale is them kept in a gun registry by the government.
no, it doesn’t present a problem at all. I know a fellow who drove for years without insurance and possibly a drivers license. he only spoke about it when he got the insurance. i asked him didn’t it concern him. he said no, he considered it a cost savings.All laws present enforcement problems for those who done want to follow them
If it was linked to them in the first place. All they have to do is say is it was stolen.And I would point out, the seller would rarely have any interest in not reporting the sale, as that gun would for ever be linked to him.
They discontinued registry of non-restricted long-guns, hunting rifles and shotguns that are not semi-automatic.Canada had a registry and canned it because it was a waste of money. they have a small number of gun owners. why would we not want to learn from their experience?
They would need a police report of the theft.If it was linked to them in the first place. All they have to do is say is it was stolen.
So such a database will make criminals turn in their weapons?First, a database to record and track all the guns would be helpful for the police.
?And are against creating one.
why, there is no requirement and who is to say it is a traceable gun in the first place?They would need a police report of the theft.
can’t say, I don’t follow Swiss gun lawsHave the Swiss had a problem with cost overruns on their registry?
if only 4% responded to a mandatory law to turn in mags, how many do you think will turn in the entire gun?To record the serial numbers and the owners. To create a database to track the guns.
no, there is a reference to sell your cloak and go buy a sword in a different gospel. many people want to combine these, but one is from Luke and one is from Mathew. One is talking about when he sent the disciples out to preach and the other is in reference to aggression.The only reference is “those who live by the sword, will die by the sword.”
we don’t enforce the laws on the books now, so what good are more laws. you want something done. preach to have the prosecutors stop dropping the gun charges for easy convictions.and punish the person.
Exactly, ‘test firing’ only shows that the firearm works. Ballistic fingerprinting ( the matching of a round to a gun) only works for shots fired recently from the firearm. The very act of firing a shot changes the finger print, as does a good cleaning. Very similar to the police trying to match tire tread marks left at the scene of a crime. The tread will be substantially different if the car has another 6 months and 3000 miles on it.Third, test fire results do not provide accurate data for law enforcement.
why would ammo not be available on the black market? Not only that, but used ammo can ( and commonly is) reloaded.I had not thought of such restrictions on all ammo sales, but since we were starting from the Swiss model, I figured we should be complete on the description.
Understoon. That addresses the point about the government issued ammo in CH, but not about any privately purchased ammo.No apology needed.
As to my point on ammo in the home, it saith…
True, but those it does enumerate may not be “temporarily” suspended, and this is as true of the second amendment as of all the others.The Constitution does not enumerate all the rights.
You have a very strange idea about the meaning of the words “agreement” and “compromise”.Its is really good to know we have reached a compromise.
I agree, so let’s adopt Switzerland’s gun laws here in the states.Hey, you agreed with getting on board with Swiss gun laws, not my fault you did not do your research first.You have a very strange idea about the meaning of the words “agreement” and “compromise”.