Gun ownership in this day and age

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sftyvlv1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Indeed, as the proverbial saying goes:

“Where there’s a will there’s a way.”

In other words, determination will overcome any obstacle.
 
40.png
LilyM:
40.png
Irishmom2:
Easy violence or not easy violence is still violence. The mind is what needs to change for violence to end.
Yeah, except that making it harder would also mean there’s less of it. Most crimes, violent and otherwise, are opportunistic, meaning you throw just a little difficulty in the criminal’s way and they will most likely give up.
Making guns harder to get just means that criminals will use something else if their mind stays the same.
“Opportunistic” means exactly that their minds most likely won’t stay the same - that they are spontaneous and influenced by the opportunity of the moment, including the opportunity that having a gun easily to hand presents. If that gun isn’t there, then that’s less of an opportunity. And chances are they won’t be so set on killing or violence that they will look for other weapons or even commit the crime.
 
Setting up random check points, with detection devices, for example. If someone is caught packing heat, the punishment is instantaneous.
This runs counter to the current judicial system.
But then, if the right to bear arms is removed, the right to due process wouldn’t be far behind.

What other constitutional rights should we remove to bring about “peace for our time”?
 
Yeah, except that making it harder would also mean there’s less of it.
How well did that work for drugs and prostitution?
Do most criminals just give up if they can’t find the drugs to buy or sell. Do ‘Johns’ just give up when they can’t find a streetwalker at the suburban mall? Or do they just go to where ‘word of mouth’ has it that such things are available?

How well did it work for alcohol during Prohibition? Did people just give up drinking just because it was now harder to get

Criminals will have only slightly less difficulty finding a gun if that. The ‘opportunistic’ nature of a violent crime is only in regards to the target, not to obtaining the tools.
 
Just like random checks for illegal drugs on 95.
Is that the method that you mentioned that would ‘eliminate’ ( your word) gun violence?

Did that method eliminate illegal drug use?
 
Of course not. But drugs grow on “trees”, guns do not.
Really, what ‘tree’ does heroin grow on? Sure, plants provide some of the material, but then again, trees provide the wood for a gun stock. Heroin requires processing from opium via controlled substance. Most of the raw material for a gun comes from either a hardware store or a junk yard. Not quite true for most drugs. Steel and wood are not legally regulated in any major country. Thus the ‘raw’ materials for a gun are trival to obtain. As are the tools used in manufacture. The skills themselves are taught in many, many high schools as part of shop classes.
My question is: how many more mass shootings will have to happen before people will say “enough is enough”?
I think what we are debating is what is a workable solution. Clearly, banning guns will not, as they are too easily made. Much like how banning drugs never resulted in them not being readily available.

I am much more in favor of letting any teacher or other school employee who desires to carry a gun to do so.

If anything, deterrence factor alone would be significant. And, having an armed response immediately on site would be helpful, instead of having to wait for an armed police response. . Plus as you noted when ‘the punishment is instantaneous’ is good way to deal with crime. What is more immediate than an armed good guy shooting back right away.
 
Last edited:
And I am still waiting to hear of what technology\method that you promised would ‘eliminate’ ( your word) gun violence.

Or why there would not be gun gangs in place of the drug gangs that currently exist
 
There is a Tom Clancy novel where the good guy counter-terrorist unit is engaging a bunch of eco-terrorists who are extremely outmatched.

Somebody says, “This isn’t very fair.”

The CO replies, “‘Fair’ means I bring back all my men alive and whole. To heck with the other team.”
 
So, pray for the conversion of all violent criminals.
As soon as they’ve all converted, I’ll turn in a firearm. Maybe the Bond Arms derringer, with it’s muzzle flip and recoil.
I’ll keep this one though. It’ll be fun at the range, and nice and loud. Concealable, too!
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Last edited:
Kacor:
Of course not. But drugs grow on “trees”, guns do not.
Really, what ‘tree’ does heroin grow on? Sure, plants provide some of the material, but then again, trees provide the wood for a gun stock. Heroin requires processing from opium via controlled substance. Most of the raw material for a gun comes from either a hardware store or a junk yard. Not quite true for most drugs. Steel and wood are not legally regulated in any major country. Thus the ‘raw’ materials for a gun are trival to obtain. As are the tools used in manufacture. The skills themselves are taught in many, many high schools as part of shop classes.
My question is: how many more mass shootings will have to happen before people will say “enough is enough”?
I think what we are debating is what is a workable solution. Clearly, banning guns will not, as they are too easily made. Much like how banning drugs never resulted in them not being readily available.

I am much more in favor of letting any teacher or other school employee who desires to carry a gun to do so.

If anything, deterrence factor alone would be significant. And, having an armed response immediately on site would be helpful, instead of having to wait for an armed police response. . Plus as you noted when ‘the punishment is instantaneous’ is good way to deal with crime. What is more immediate than an armed good guy shooting back right away.
You do realise that heroin is an opioid? Which like all opioids is derived from the opium poppy flower? Which, as flowers tend to do,very much grows - admittedly in fields rather than on trees, but hardly the point?
 
Last edited:
You do realise that heroin is an opioid? Which like all opioids is derived from the opium poppy flower? Which, as flowers tend to do,very much grows - admittedly in fields rather than on trees, but hardly the point?
Derived is the key word here. There is significant processing required, first to extract the opium from the poppy. Convert that ( chemically) into Morphine, and then convert that ( chemically) into Heroin

Thus the processing of heroin is substantially more complex than the manufacture of a firearm. And more specifically, the processing of heroin requires access to several heavily controlled substances. The manufacturing of firearms requires access to basic steel. Which you can obtain at any junk yard.

Which was my point.

If law enforcement cannot stop a complex product such as heroin from regularly getting into the hands of criminals, how are they going to stop them from getting firearms.

And none of this is even entering into the concept of 3D printed firearms…
 
trees provide the wood for a gun stock
Hi-Points come from recycled plastic straws and pot metal. Glocks come from Tupperware. But I have some nice walnut stocks on my Henry .357. 😎
 
Last edited:
Scripture tells us it’s only going to get worse. Which is why I carry. Besides, a cop is just too heavy to carry!
 
Those passages are certainly instructive, and don’t contradict eschatology at all.
 
Mine’s more like this:(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
40.png
LilyM:
You do realise that heroin is an opioid? Which like all opioids is derived from the opium poppy flower? Which, as flowers tend to do,very much grows - admittedly in fields rather than on trees, but hardly the point?
Derived is the key word here. There is significant processing required, first to extract the opium from the poppy. Convert that ( chemically) into Morphine, and then convert that ( chemically) into Heroin

Thus the processing of heroin is substantially more complex than the manufacture of a firearm. And more specifically, the processing of heroin requires access to several heavily controlled substances. The manufacturing of firearms requires access to basic steel. Which you can obtain at any junk yard.

Which was my point.

If law enforcement cannot stop a complex product such as heroin from regularly getting into the hands of criminals, how are they going to stop them from getting firearms.

And none of this is even entering into the concept of 3D printed firearms…
All the “processing” that is needed with an opium poppy really is just to ingest a sufficient quantity of the poppy seeds. Your average morning poppy seed bagel or slice of poppy seed cake (or two) won’t be enough, but people have failed drug tests for eating large quantities of seeds.
 
the reality is: a gun in the criminal’s hand is here to stay and your only defense against this is a gun in your own hand
Yep. Or one in each hand.
The only opinion about my carrying a firearm that matters to me is my local sheriff’s. She says I can carry three. All at the same time, if I wanted to. And my Nevada permit says I can carry as many in that state, and 30 or so others, at one time as I can successfully conceal. Clank, clank, lol! If somebody doesn’t like it, tough! 😁
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top