As the Catechism states:
regarding the mystery of evil
“no quick answer will suffice”
which defines the very nature of this format. a forum such as this is not fitted for such a discussion. It would take whole courses to treat of the subject …or whole books…
nor would such an endeavor with the right circumstances prove to remove the parts mystery that would remain.
a full understanding on this side of history …
it out strips us.
what we can give…we give. Our reason to trust God comes from many sources…reason, the encounter with beauty and goodness, the meaning laden creation, the joys of life and love, the very existence of reason, the revelation of God, etc…above all in the very person of Jesus of Nazareth. In his voice, in his face, in his love, in his entering the suffering caused by sin— in his resurrection we encounter God.
You know why this kind of response isn’t satisfying for me though, don’t you? I mean, it would be
totally dissatisfying to hear as an answer to someone
elses religion, wouldn’t you agree?
Beauty, goodness, creation, life, love, existence, reason, revelation, [your God]. I mean, If I put Allah in Yahweh’s place, you’d say “how in world did he come to that conclusion!? Why is he saying these things? I don’t associate any of those things with a god that’s not Yahweh or Jesus or whathaveyou.”
we respond with faith and reason…a theological answer to a theological question…
to simply dismiss it is like a someone asking a question of history and when he receives a historical answer …being unhappy to not get a mathematical answer!
I’m inclined to argree with you about that. But what
is a theological answer? One which, wherein hearing it, a person is satisfied with “no quick answer,” or “'tis a great mystery?”
One of the things I wanted to promote was what you were saying about difficult ideas
outstripping us. The idea of God (the unsearchable, the unknowable, unfathomable) is something which totally outstrips anything in my natural reason (and so it should - God is totally elusive to, at least, our natural senses). We have the idea of
evil that is hard, intellectually, to reconcile with a loving God and we call it a mystery because it confounds some of the ideas we hold about God. But there are ideas about God within Christianity that are, at least, internally consistent, and don’t contradict other ideas (indeed, they fit in the total package; fit with what we expect), but
that they don’t puzzle us or make us uneasy as to why a thing is the way it is - this is my grand point - doesn’t mean our speculations are any better. Our speculations about evil are bad ones (I know it; you’re aware of it; the Catholic church acknowledges it); Our speculations about
goodness and miracles and subjectively
good things are not any better by virtue of our complacency. And that, I think, is the larger problem in Christianity: that we accept as ready and unassailable truth, the things which make us feel at home, so to speak.
I don’t expect agreement about this potential problem of complacency, but it is something that should be pondered by Christians and non-believers alike.