W
wynnejj
Guest
I don’t see much of a difference between the possibility of malware in closed source, commercial software and say the open source software maintained by a generally reliable open source mainstream Linux distribution - e.g. Fedora which acts as the proving ground for commercial RedHat. Bugs, maybe, but not malware. And, if you buy commercial RedHat, than bugs are minimal. However, if you install the distro, then download additional software from potentially questionable websites, well it is little different then all the other freeware out there. One thing that open source from a reliable Linux distro seems to have immunity is generally Ad-ware.The problem with open source is that it still requires education. While people can go through the code, most won’t. Its more trustworthy to get products from an established company, as they won’t include malware, even if they are closed source.
Years ago, the charge that one had to learn too much about the Unix/Linux command line is largely not true with more of the user-friendly distros. GUI installations mostly. I have found little difference in difficulty in re-building a Windows partition, compared to building a Linux partition nowadays, unless you choose a distro such as Gentoo, Arch, or SlackWare targeting geeks.
Bottom line… I think one make make reasonable arguments supporting the position that you are less likely to get “malware” from mainline Linux repositories that seek to gain a commercial audience for their free products with commercial support.
I’m a happy penguin, but then again my essential needs fit well within the set of Linux products freely available. And I spend virtually no time in keeping my system constantly updated, and I’m online all the time. (Knock on wood.)