P
Patchunky
Guest
This isn’t correct.Its also worth noting that in icons of the nativity, its not even required to include St. Joseph. There just needs to be Christ, the Theotokos, a donkey, and an ox. I can’t see how St.Joseph can be considered second to the Theotokos before St. John the baptist when he doesn’t even have to be in the Nativity icon.
In “THE MEANING OF ICONS” by Leonid Ouspensky and Vladimir Lossky for the icon of the Nativity of Christ, they state the following…" Another detail empsasises that in the Nativity of Christ the “order of nature is vanquished” - this is Joseph. He is not part of the central group of the Child and His Mother; he is not the father and is emphatically seperated from this group. Before him, under the guise of an old and bent shepherd, stands the devil tempting him. On some icons he is represendted with small horns or a short tail. The presence of the devil and his role of tempter acquires a particularly deep eanign int connection with this “feast of re-creation”. Here, on the basis of tradition, the icon transmits the meaning of certain liturgic texts, which speak of the doubts of Joseph and the troubled state of his soul. This state is expressed in the icon by his dejected attitude and is emphasised by the black mouth of the cave, which sometimes serves as a background to his figure. Tradition, transmitted also by the apocrypha, relates ahow the devil tempted Joseph telling him that a virgin birth is not possible, being opposed to the laws of nature. In the person of Joseph the icon discloses not only his personal drama, but the drama of all mankind - the difficulty of accepting that which is “beyond words or reason” - the Incarnation of God."
So, you see, Joseph plays a VERY important role in the Nativity Icon and he is present in ALL traditional icons of the Nativity of Christ.