Harry Potter. Sin or no?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCardinalbird
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I was honestly never as drawn by CS Lewis’s works; neither the more adult and children’s fiction. Tolkien was more my speed. I found Tolkien’s attempt to give England a mythology, not to mention what I view as a stunning merging of a pre-Christian pagan Nordic tradition (the Valar stem in part from the Germanic pantheon) with a fundamentally Catholic notion of Godhood.

Yes, the Valar are gods, in that they are supernatural beings of great power who predate the world, but they are not God. For the most part Tolkien masters this by keeping Illuvatar out of the narrative, save for the Ainulindale (the Music of the Ainur), and at a few critical points, as when the Valar hand over the governorship of the world to Illuvatar when the Numenoreans rebel and set foot on Aman (the undying lands, the home of the Valar). Thus he evades treading, as it were, on any Biblical territory. The Bible doesn’t say how the Earth was made, and certainly leaves room open for the notion that some angelic beings might be involved in the governing of things on Earth, so that these are not heretical views.

There are only two things in the entire mythos that I’d regard as “one to one mappings”. The first is Melkor, who is clearly Satan. While you don’t even get the full sense of Melkor’s native power even in the Silmarillion, in the later released writings, in particular Morgoth’s Ring, we get some very good detail on how Melkor became Morgoth, that Morgoth was a shadow of the original Ainu Melkor, who was the mightiest of all the angelic beings, and who dispersed his native powers throughout the Earth to control it. Thus we have a shadow of the Judeao-Christian Fall, that the world was fundamentally altered and made less than it was at Creation, and that it is now stained.

In Morgoth’s Ring is well is a surprising bit of narrative where there is some suggestion that mortal men (as opposed to Elves) were turned from God by Morgoth. It is fashioned in the form of a legend that the men who first enter the narrative of the Silmarillion tell the Elves that a being appeared among them, and turned them to sin, and that sounds a LOT like the Garden of Eden story. Even Christopher Tolkien expressed some surprise at this, as this sort of direct allegorical correlation was so unlike his father.

But other than that, I think LotR and the Silmarillion are Catholic works in a more tenuous respect, and he never intended you to identify Gandalf with Christ, seeing as Illuvatar is God, and, though never actually dealt with within the mythos (which in Tolkien’s view, would have been pre-Christian, even pre-Hebraic), would certainly have been the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Gandalf was an angel who was slain by a demon (and by slain, rendered impotent and would have taken a very long time to recover, if ever), and was resurrected by Illuvatar. That might be seen as presaging Christ’s resurrection, and is Christ-like to be sure (but then again, some point out the Christ-like symbolism in Superman as well).
 
I was quite active on a Tolkien Usenet group in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and the fate of the souls of Orcs was a matter of huge debate! My view, based largely on Tolkien’s own views that while Morgoth and Sauron could corrupt the Children of Illuvatar (Men and Elves), neither could fundamentally change the gifts given to them by God, Orcs would have joined the Elves in the Halls of Mandos, where doubtless, they might spend a great deal of time, but ultimately be restored to their intended nature. The same goes for the Nazgul, who were mortal men doomed to die (and their souls to leave the world for parts unknown). The Nine Rings could extend their lives, but remember the description of how Bilbo felt after decades with the Ruling Ring; he felt “stretched, like butter spread too thin”, in other words, the Rings of Power didn’t give mortals more life, they simply spread out the life that had been given them by God. They lived longer in a temporal sense, but not in a spiritual sense.
 
Last edited:
The notion of things “winding down”, or more properly aging is key to the backstory of the Lord of the Rings. The smiths of Eregion, who fashioned the Rings of Power, with Sauron’s aid (though they didn’t know he was Sauron at the time), were attempting to hold off that progression of the world; that slow fading of the older order. Tolkien made it clear in later writings that that was a sinful attitude, a demonstration of a lack of faith that Arda would progress as God intended. Thus you see the preservative powers of the Rings of Power; the Nazgul given an apparently extended lifespan (they were thousands of years old by the time they first show up in the Shire hunting for Baggins), and you can see it in Lorien, where Galadriel wields one of the Three, and Lorien is an image of the world in a previous age, seemingly defying time.

It also relates to Sauron’s personal fall as well. In the beginning he was of the Folk of Aule, and thus a craftsmen, and his desire was for order, and that is how Melkor corrupted him. That whole notion that the sins of the Powers were often rooted in something that might be viewed as good or worthwhile is a core message of LotR. Saruman tricks himself into believing he wants the Ruling Ring so he can combat Sauron, even if he knows that at best he would simply replace Sauron. Gandalf, Elrond and Galadriel, the mightiest dwellers of Middle Earth other than Sauron, all refuse the Ring precisely because it would corrupt them, that that desire for Power would twist itself, and out of good intentions would come great evil.

Oh man, I wish I hadn’t got started. As you can see I greatly love Tolkien’s works, and the philosophical underpinnings. I know I’m an atheist, but it is perhaps LotR that draws me most closely to appreciating a Catholic view of a Fallen World.
 
Indeed. How could you ever disprove that against any work? Maybe The Catcher In The Rye is filled with encoded spells, maybe Raymond Chandler detective novels are.

In reality, I think it is just some people unwilling to admit that they’ve been duped by what amounts to a conspiracy theory. The spells in HP are just pig latin or some muddled Latin words, used for effect. There’s no hidden or encoded magic, and while yes, the story is about wizards, I’ve always viewed it as a story about friendship, loyalty, honor, and doing the right thing, even when it involves personal risk. The magic is the setting, but the story itself is of good conquering evil.
 
In fact, up thread I was quite clear that I’ve been trying the “wingardium leviosa” spell for years and have yet to levitate anything.
 
Mine is somewhat similar. I was bullied a lot as a kid, and I found LotR was a way I could escape those difficulties. I still re-read it every five or six years. It’s like an old friend, and we’ll spend a few weeks every few years getting reacquainted.
 
One would be wiser to watch out for the ever-popular Golden Compass–which the Author actively admits is created to drive people to atheism and to mock Christianity. It’s now being made into children’s toys and a whole bunch of series and I NEVER hear an outcry against it. 'Cause cool dystopian vs eeeeeeeevil Magic.
 
Not sure that’s true. NPR just ran a story about his upcoming book and the BBC Television series. And I think I saw an advert for a line of toys, too.
 
If it influences you and your way of thinking yes. Harry Potter does not reflect Christian virtue, so I think it is best to not watch it.
 
Which is the truth? Surely there can only be one
The Church doesn’t really have a stance on this kind of stuff as far as I know, so it’s up to our prudential judgment as others have said. I would personally encourage something like ‘Lord of the Rings’ instead which isn’t questionable when it comes to the author and content.

I hope this has helped

God Bless You

Thank you for reading.
 
Last edited:
I’d definitely discourage it’s reading. The author has made his pro-atheist, and especially his anti-Catholic and anti-Christian intentions know. I don’t think that one can “stop” others unless they are minors in one’s care.

My point is that while it has not captured the public’s imagination quite as much the danger is immeasurably higher. Whether or not Rowling achieved her goal in inserting Christianity, and whether or not she did through via an appropriate vehicle the intention was to respect the faith at the very basic. Pullman’s intention, both overtly and by his own admission, are purely evil and he fully intends to drive the reader towards anti-christianity, anti-Catholic princibles and encourage atheism.
 
Yea, but I know that’s not true, I feel I can trust the Author enough to dismiss such claims.

God Bless You

Thank you for reading.
 
Oh, he’s zealous alright. I know in one interview I heard him say that he hopes that his books get many to follow the logic of atheism. The NPR interviewer was clearly getting tired of his anti-Christianity, anti-Religion stance and made a hysterical comment about how “all authors pray that their books reach people” with an emphasis on “pray”.

What’s funny is that interviewer wasn’t really known for his gentleness towards religion, and I’d often turned him off when he took things too far. But he seemed to have a hard time with Pullman’s attitude.
 
I first read it in middle school during a rough time in my life. I literally cried when I finished the last page because the adventure was over with. Maybe it was just the time or my age, but I have never had such strong feelings for a story since then. I went on to read it again another 12 times or so. [over a span of years]
 
Is Golden Compass still a thing?
Haven’t seen anyone read it in eons
 
Yep. Everyone is up in arms over Potter, which clearly has strong Christian allegorical content, while ignoring the clearly atheistic, anti-Catholic Compass series…
 
Is Golden Compass still a thing?
Haven’t seen anyone read it in eons
Yeah, it’s still a thing. It’s more for teens and adults, not children so it gets less “air time” and you see less children running about demanding $$$ merchandizing from their parents–but with the new book coming out and the TV show on the horizon.
 
Yep. Everyone is up in arms over Potter, which clearly has strong Christian allegorical content, while ignoring the clearly atheistic, anti-Catholic Compass series…
And there are MANY other examples. Pullman is just the most popular and most virulent.

My point is that there are MANY examples of authors who are trying to get people to fall into atheism–or at the very least hate of the Faith. Actively. And they are doing a “good” job of it. Their books have millions of copies sold. And yet, when people cry foul over Harry Potter, I often wonder what else they are letting their children indiscriminately read.

My friend’s daughter got into reading the “classics” surrounding Latin Literature after reading Percy Jaxon books. When it was revealed one of the characters was gay the author explained that he was actually sticking true to the story of the Greek Gods. My friend had me–and another person–filtering the “new” book and she had NO idea that she was accessing lurid tales of gay relationships when reading Homer and about ancient Rome. Her mom figured historic=wholesome. Yet once we were made aware by the later Percy Jaxon book…we reviewed what she had read…and had to sit down and have some really important talks.

Truly she would have been better off with Harry Potter. But because her mother was fixated on “keeping her away from bad influences” she ended up receiving an education in far worse without any guidance.

I get anxious whenever I see parents or adults dismiss a subject like “magic” outright and demonize a singular book, especially when the author has made many statements to the contrary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top