Harry Potter. Sin or no?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCardinalbird
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Xanthippe_Voorhees said:
40.png
Lovinglight:
Hes better than Fr. Martin and the progressives far as theology goes. I fully trust his opinions on any matter especially in light of everything thats happening within the Church.
Click to expand...
🤨

So you admit a priest can be in error but then put your full trust in a priest? Quite frankly, the Church doesn’t even approve all of the things saints say. There was a saint who declared that it was immodest for babies to be in diapers on a hot day.

One should use caution. It’s good that you are cautious about things. But it’s really bad that you are attributing something that is mental illness.

Answer this.

If a priest said someone’s house burned down because they didn’t pray and weren’t “faithful enough” would you truly trust that priest?

Your right to do so, but I would be very concerned.
Click to expand...
Youre misquoting the context of what Fr. Ripperger was saying.

He said a lady did the fire spell from Harry Potter and burned her house down.

And yeah…i do believe thats possible.

Of course Priests can be in error…Fr. Martin is a wonderful example of that. Has Fr. Ripperger ever errored?.. im sure he has but i believe in his integrity to ammend it if he thought he was wrong. Theres the difference between the 2 imo.
 
I find u to be arrogant and condescending a real ‘right fighter’. I OVER answered your question in regards to the books and i realize youre calling me stupid so just say it and quit with the psycho babble.

Let me tell u something. I dont appreciate it. I dont even like talking to ppl like u who do ad hominen attacks and gas light the most obvious truth as to the prevading occult qualities in both trilogies.

Im aware LOTR was written by a Catholic…still doesnt negate the FACT that trilogy is occult magic so i said it is!

Not reading the actual books has nothing to do with the truth in how i described it! If u think that makes my opinion invalid…then so be it.

U cant even admit youre wrong about your premise that the LOTR and harry potter isnt occult fiction when its just plain as day to anyone with half a brain.
 
Idc what u think about Fr. Ripperger so quit tagging me with your opinions of him.
 
Do i need to post the definition of occult fiction again?

Here u go!

Occult fiction. Definition. Used for works dealing with witchcraft, spiritualism, psychic phenomena, voodooism, etc., and for works dealing with the mysterious or secret knowledge and power supposedly attainable only through these and other magical or supernatural means.

Im able to differentiate an authors work of occult fiction from their personal faith. Can u do likewise?
 
Have u even read the books yourself? Im begining to think not.

Like i said…ive spent hours watching the movies of both trilogies…i dont need to spend weeks reading the books to be able to state something SO OBVIOUS that those trilogies are occult fiction.

What do u think the magic ring is about! The elves/dwarves/wraiths/wizards etc etc etc
 
To clarify, I have read part of Harry Potter when I was younger and I watched many of the movies.

The claim I recall was that it was based on actual magic spells, I don’t remember from what language. I am not using this as evidence, only saying.

The problem is that Harry Potter supports trust in magic spells and what not over trust in Christ. This might sound silly to you, but to little children who are given this it means something.
Frankly let us look at the works. SO MANY of those who buy into many genders and all sorts of terrible things that come off of Tumblr LOVE Harry Potter. This is not a good thing. Like, I don’t mean they often just like it. I mean often they LOVE it as one of their favorites and have probably done types of role playing.

There’s just no real reason to read it. Safety first and all that, can’t say I always follow that advice though.
 
Kei said:
The claim I recall was that it was based on actual magic spells, I don’t remember from what language. I am not using this as evidence, only saying.
Click to expand...
What makes spells “real”? I’ve asked that each time it comes up and no answer
 
Obviously some of u ppl are so invested in your occult fiction trilogies that any mention of Priests and ppl like me who see them as such is just offensive and intolerable to u!

Its truly ridiculous.

Theres nothing more to be said on it and i despise circular arguements over such an obvious truth of the very nature of those movies!
 
Nobody cares about your defense of the occult fiction u love so much!

U keep defending sauron and gandalf as not using magic. Im laughing at u as i read it.

U seem like youre realllllllly into that crap.
 
Actually i consider myself blessed not to have read that occult madness. Its bad enough i watched the movies.

And the movies are more than enough to know its all occult fiction!

Doesnt matter to me if LOTR author is Catholic. Jk rowling claims to be a Christian.
 
And why DID you watch the movies when you’re so opposed to them?
 
Last edited:
What makes a spell real is that it is actually effectual.
A spell that is effectual is one that presumably uses prĂŚternatural forces to do things. This would mean demonic forces.
So, if there is a spell or what not that takes advantage of prĂŚternatural forces, then it is real.

Many witches will tell you about their certainly prĂŚternatural experiences. What is sad is that they think it is proof of the goodness of their beliefs when it actually shows why they should come out of them and into God.

Don’t look into it if you are not strong in Faith. I realize to some saying “don’t do it” makes them want to do it more, but no. Really do not. The demons need only a slightly open door to enter in, and they could tell you 999 truths just to slip in 1 falsehood.
 
Dont feign innocence to me! Im smart enough to know exactly how ppl like u veil your insults. Im just more direct.

Good for u for liking occult fiction. Not my cup of tea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top