E
EmilyAlexandra
Guest
This is a bit of a specific question, so please don’t respond based just on the thread title!
The priest referred to in the title is a Catholic Benedictine monk and priest. Somebody addressed him as “Father”, as in, “Good morning, Father”, or, “Would you like a cup of tea, Father?” He said that he doesn’t like to be addressed as “Father” because it’s like being addressed as “Sir”. He said that he prefers to be called “Father David” or just “David” if some non-Catholics don’t like using the title “Father” (David is not his real name, by the way, but I thought I’d better not use his real name).
He also said that although every Benedictine monk is correctly given the title “Dom”, he doesn’t think that monks should actually be addressed as “Dom” (as in “Hello, Dom David”), as he considers it “arrogant”, since the title is derived from the word for “Lord”.
So, in summary, he had no objection to the title “Father” in principle, but considers that it should always be prefixed to a priest’s first name rather than being used as a term of deference equivalent to Sir/Ma’am etc. He thought that “Dom” should be used in the sense of, “I am pleased to introduce our guest speaker, the Reverend Dom Michael Jones”, rather than, “Thank you for that fascinating lecture, Dom Michael”.
Is this quite common? Perhaps it’s a cultural/generational thing? This chap was English and quite elderly.
The priest referred to in the title is a Catholic Benedictine monk and priest. Somebody addressed him as “Father”, as in, “Good morning, Father”, or, “Would you like a cup of tea, Father?” He said that he doesn’t like to be addressed as “Father” because it’s like being addressed as “Sir”. He said that he prefers to be called “Father David” or just “David” if some non-Catholics don’t like using the title “Father” (David is not his real name, by the way, but I thought I’d better not use his real name).
He also said that although every Benedictine monk is correctly given the title “Dom”, he doesn’t think that monks should actually be addressed as “Dom” (as in “Hello, Dom David”), as he considers it “arrogant”, since the title is derived from the word for “Lord”.
So, in summary, he had no objection to the title “Father” in principle, but considers that it should always be prefixed to a priest’s first name rather than being used as a term of deference equivalent to Sir/Ma’am etc. He thought that “Dom” should be used in the sense of, “I am pleased to introduce our guest speaker, the Reverend Dom Michael Jones”, rather than, “Thank you for that fascinating lecture, Dom Michael”.
Is this quite common? Perhaps it’s a cultural/generational thing? This chap was English and quite elderly.