C
CompSciGuy
Guest
An evangelical friend of mine has started reading books about Catholicism, some of which are ok, like Catholicism for dummies, but don’t feature a lot of apologetics. But he’s also reading another one called “Is Rome the True Church?” by Norman Geisler. I sort of cringed when I looked at it because I thought, oh brother, I bet I already know what this is about. I read some of the information at Amazon.com and found out that the book itself is a response to the president of the Evangelical Theological Society converting to the Catholic faith (praise the Lord!) and stepping down from his position. It has very poor reviews and I think that most of the reviews are by Catholic converts. I also saw that apparently the co-author converted to Catholicism shortly after the book was published.
But aside from all that, I am wondering if anyone has read this book and could tell me basically what arguments he makes; I feel like I have somewhat of an obligation to my friend since he’s reading into Catholicism, and I want to be able to point him in the right direction if he’s interested. But I wonder if I should bother reading this or not, if it’s all just the same old arguments I’ve heard before and nothing new.
But aside from all that, I am wondering if anyone has read this book and could tell me basically what arguments he makes; I feel like I have somewhat of an obligation to my friend since he’s reading into Catholicism, and I want to be able to point him in the right direction if he’s interested. But I wonder if I should bother reading this or not, if it’s all just the same old arguments I’ve heard before and nothing new.