E
EasterJoy
Guest
People do succeed in doing this. Some even have better marriages, because they are forced to be stronger and better in order to get through the rebuilding of trust.
I have a book I’d loan you if you were a friend. It is titled, How to Forgive: A Step-By-Step Guide, by Fr. John Monbourquette. I didn’t find every last thing in it useful, but I found some stuff in there that helped me. The author is both a priest and psychiatrist. The book may give you some ideas, and at the very least it will let you allow yourself for this to be a process you go through with your husband, and not a “yes, I will” or “no, I won’t” thing.
I would point out something from canon law on this subject:
***Can. 1152 §1. **Although it is earnestly recommended that a spouse, moved by Christian charity and concerned for the good of the family, not refuse forgiveness to an adulterous partner and not disrupt conjugal life, nevertheless, if the spouse did not condone the fault of the other expressly or tacitly, the spouse has the right to sever conjugal living unless the spouse consented to the adultery, gave cause for it, or also committed adultery.
**Can. 1155 *The innocent spouse laudably can readmit the other spouse to conjugal life; in this case the innocent spouse renounces the right to separate.
Why does the Church do this–that is, require the innocent spouse to renounce the right to separate after taking back an adulterous spouse? (Of course the law refers to a spouse who does not re-offend.) It is because at some point the punishment has to end. When you took your spouse back, in effect you told him, “I know what you did to me and to our marriage, and I will look past it. What you did is no longer your problem, which by all rights it ought to be. What you did is now our problem, because I am freely taking you back.” Now you bear this burden together: you bear the offense, and he supports you in your work of bearing what you did not deserve.
That does not mean that you renounce all right to go through a process of rebuilding trust with him. It does mean that you renounce the right to punish him for an offense he cannot un-do.
As for the “I would never…” just ask him to say something else. He has to concede that none of us can say what we would never do. St. Peter said “I would never…” before the Crucifixion. That didn’t turn out to be true. After the Crucifixion, he said, over and over, “Yes, Lord, you know I love you.”
You might ask St. Peter to help you. Ask St. Paul. Ask any saint you can think of who really blew it, big time. They will understand what you are going through, because being where they are now, they fully understand the gravity of what they did to Our Lord, and the great mercy that your husband is asking of you.
I have a book I’d loan you if you were a friend. It is titled, How to Forgive: A Step-By-Step Guide, by Fr. John Monbourquette. I didn’t find every last thing in it useful, but I found some stuff in there that helped me. The author is both a priest and psychiatrist. The book may give you some ideas, and at the very least it will let you allow yourself for this to be a process you go through with your husband, and not a “yes, I will” or “no, I won’t” thing.
I would point out something from canon law on this subject:
***Can. 1152 §1. **Although it is earnestly recommended that a spouse, moved by Christian charity and concerned for the good of the family, not refuse forgiveness to an adulterous partner and not disrupt conjugal life, nevertheless, if the spouse did not condone the fault of the other expressly or tacitly, the spouse has the right to sever conjugal living unless the spouse consented to the adultery, gave cause for it, or also committed adultery.
**Can. 1155 *The innocent spouse laudably can readmit the other spouse to conjugal life; in this case the innocent spouse renounces the right to separate.
Why does the Church do this–that is, require the innocent spouse to renounce the right to separate after taking back an adulterous spouse? (Of course the law refers to a spouse who does not re-offend.) It is because at some point the punishment has to end. When you took your spouse back, in effect you told him, “I know what you did to me and to our marriage, and I will look past it. What you did is no longer your problem, which by all rights it ought to be. What you did is now our problem, because I am freely taking you back.” Now you bear this burden together: you bear the offense, and he supports you in your work of bearing what you did not deserve.
That does not mean that you renounce all right to go through a process of rebuilding trust with him. It does mean that you renounce the right to punish him for an offense he cannot un-do.
As for the “I would never…” just ask him to say something else. He has to concede that none of us can say what we would never do. St. Peter said “I would never…” before the Crucifixion. That didn’t turn out to be true. After the Crucifixion, he said, over and over, “Yes, Lord, you know I love you.”
You might ask St. Peter to help you. Ask St. Paul. Ask any saint you can think of who really blew it, big time. They will understand what you are going through, because being where they are now, they fully understand the gravity of what they did to Our Lord, and the great mercy that your husband is asking of you.