C
Contarini
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98e62/98e62aa7851937a7a683ecde88e39fa51a720d43" alt="40.png"
As JKirk has pointed out, you’re flatly wrong here. There’s abundant evidence that bishops in the early Church were elected, apparently by popular acclamation (there are accounts of mobs essentially forcing some popular person to become bishop–this happened to Ambrose, for instance). Later on this changed to election by the episcopal chapter, with the people playing a purely formal role (I’m sure that episcopal elections were often arranged from the beginning). Papal appointment is a relatively modern method. The idea that the Catholic Church has always been an absolute monarchy is a bit of modern revisionism. It’s fabrication. The Church has been governed in a lot of different ways historically. It’s never functioned like a modern democracy, true. But many of the institutions of modern democracy were influenced by Church institutions, such as the mendicant orders which helped develop the idea of representative government.What makes you think that the early bishops were elected by the laity? The early bishops were appointed by the Apostles. These early bishops then appointed priests and deacons, and eventually, other bishops. The authoritative structure of the Catholic Church has always been top down, not bottom up. We have never even remotely resembled a democracy.
Edwin