Has Ecumenism changed the meaning of EENS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kathryn_Ann
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect me to go back through a thread looking for your posts to reread. So, maybe if you want dialogue, you could include the post #. I asked that other guy to do this when he asked about something he posted, but he ignored me. You can, too, but srsly, it’s not like I have memorized who said what by screen name.

Your opinion is that only a small and elite group will get to Heaven?
You are certainly misunderstanding. All who go to heaven will do so because of the Catholic Church. Why? Because Jesus made it so. They may have belonged to a Baptist Church, A Morman Church, or have been a Budist but in Heaven they will realize their error and all will belong to the Church Jesus established. The One Holy and Catholic Church. You are being to narrow in your definition of what Catholic is.
 
You are certainly misunderstanding. All who go to heaven will do so because of the Catholic Church. Why? Because Jesus made it so. They may have belonged to a Baptist Church, A Morman Church, or have been a Budist but in Heaven they will realize their error and all will belong to the Church Jesus established. The One Holy and Catholic Church. You are being to narrow in your definition of what Catholic is.
This is really, really shocking and upsetting to see. Not you in particular, but the sheer number of Catholics who hold to this kind of thinking which I’m seeing in this thread. I’m really disheartened.
 
One of my colleagues at work is a non-Catholic Christian of some kind, and recently he read a book that convinced him, using some kind of twisted private interpretation of Scripture, that everyone will eventually go to Heaven, and that Hell is only something more like Purgatory, definitely temporary. One of the evils that has come from this deception is that there is no motivation for him to pray for anyone else to believe in any kind of truth, or for him to talk to anyone else about Christ or God or anything, and no more motivation for him to even lead any kind of moral life or adhere to any beliefs at all. In effect he’s now, according the implications of his new beliefs, completely free to do anything he wants, with no lasting consequence. All because of the simply (incorrect) belief that eventually everyone gets to Heaven.
 
One of my colleagues at work is a non-Catholic Christian of some kind, and recently he read a book that convinced him, using some kind of twisted private interpretation of Scripture, that everyone will eventually go to Heaven, and that Hell is only something more like Purgatory, definitely temporary. One of the evils that has come from this deception is that there is no motivation for him to pray for anyone else to believe in any kind of truth, or for him to talk to anyone else about Christ or God or anything, and no more motivation for him to even lead any kind of moral life or adhere to any beliefs at all. In effect he’s now, according the implications of his new beliefs, completely free to do anything he wants, with no lasting consequence. All because of the simply (incorrect) belief that eventually everyone gets to Heaven.
You have correctly identified the danger of believing everyone goes to heaven.
 
I posted because I got the impression that you think people who think few will be saved are elitists, and I hope you can see that at least when it comes to salvation, I’m not.
Rich, anyone who is not in hell forever is saved. I was never arguing “post after post” about the few or the many. I was just stating the Church’s position.
 
You are certainly misunderstanding. .
I understand the position with perfect clarity. I also understand that people are giving their own views of what they think are the Church’s views.

There are no religions in heaven.
 
I understand the position with perfect clarity. I also understand that people are giving their own views of what they think are the Church’s views.

There are no religions in heaven.
I think you may have a very confused understanding of Heaven, Jesus, the Church, God, etc. I hope you don’t take offense at this but rather I hope to root out the cause of this confusion so we can all come to mutual consensus instead of chasing endless confusions like we seem to be doing.
 
I understand the position with perfect clarity. I also understand that people are giving their own views of what they think are the Church’s views.

There are no religions in heaven.
Your right there will only be the Church that Jesus established.
 
I think you may have a very confused understanding of Heaven, Jesus, the Church, God, etc. I hope you don’t take offense at this but rather I hope to root out the cause of this confusion so we can all come to mutual consensus instead of chasing endless confusions like we seem to be doing.
I am not a topic. And I’m done answering posts directed at me instead of the topic. I’ll just start reporting them in future.

You are invited to state what you believe the Church teaching is and back up your opinions with Church documents. I have.
 
I am not a topic. And I’m done answering posts directed at me instead of the topic. I’ll just start reporting them in future.

You are invited to state what you believe the Church teaching is and back up your opinions with Church documents. I have.
I thought I did a pretty good job of that throughout this entire thread, actually. But I guess not. Oh well. I just had a baby yesterday so I’m going to stop wasting my time with people who seem to just like to argue without actually using reason or logic.
 
Congratulations! 👍 👍

I wish you and your little one every blessing in the Lord. You are both in my prayers.
Yes, Congratulations and all best prayers and good wishes for you both and all the family!
:grouphug::hug1::harp::heaven:
 
Thanks all, I appreciate the congratulations, but I really didn’t intend to derail the thread like that. I just wanted to explain why I wasn’t going to continue going in circles like this anymore.
 
This is really, really shocking and upsetting to see. Not you in particular, but the sheer number of Catholics who hold to this kind of thinking which I’m seeing in this thread. I’m really disheartened.
Don’t be. It’s an accurate description of church teaching. You should be happy that salvation is availabe to all who want it. Besides, you need to tend to your little one.

Many prayers and good wishes to you and your new miracle.
 
You make nothing out of the sacraments if christs church isn’t necessary for salvation.
 
You make nothing out of the sacraments if christs church isn’t necessary for salvation.
There is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church. She alone is “necessary for salvation” and this is unchangeable.
 
I’m new to the faith, so I’m grateful for your opinions here.:angel1:

Is it possible to go so far in welcoming dialogue with other faiths that we lose the “No Salvation outside the Church” tradition? Or has that tradition changed, or the way we interpret that teaching?🤷

I realize that the Church recognizes that some people, not having been raised in the Catholic faith, may attain Heaven because they are basically following the consciences that God gave them, etc. and leading good lives. I’m concerned to see that some, not all Catholics, believe that The Church is going overboard in this area of ecumenism.

I haven’t formed an opinion on this yet, as I’m a fairly new:blush: adult convert (since 2004.) Are any of you concerned that there has been a real theological shift in the way that The Church/Vatican, The Holy Father is interacting with leaders (and people of) other faiths?

Occasionally, I will see websites claiming that we should extend a welcoming hand to people of other faiths, but that we no longer are teaching the idea of “No Salvation outside the Church,” and are instead sounding as if we are saying that there is little difference between* any* people of good faith. Is this true? On the other hand, is this a good or bad thing, stressing our similarities rather than our differences?:grouphug:

Not having been raised in the Catholic Faith, I don’t know how others here feel about this. Has there been a huge change since Vatican II in how we address this issue or not? Have teachings changed on how we approach the issue of “No salvation outside the Church?”:highprayer:

I appreciate your wisdom here, and have no personal agenda. I just wonder if the Church is teaching something new, in the opinion of people here who have been Catholics much longer than myself.

Gratefully,
Kathryn Ann:heaven:
Many people translate the Latin phrase extra ecclesiam nulla salus as “Outside the Church there is no salvation.” This translation does not seem entirely faithful to the Latin meaning, and contributes to the misunderstanding of the phrase.

The Latin word “extra” is both an adverb and preposition. Depending on its use in a sentence, the word has different meanings. When used to describe spatial relations between objects, the word is translated as “beyond” or “outside of”(e.g., beyond the creek is a tree; or, James is outside of the room). When used to describe abstract relations between concepts or intangible things, the word is commonly translated “without” (e.g., Without a method, it is difficult to teach). Within the phrase in question, extra is a preposition describing the abstract relationship of the Church to salvation. Considering the Latin nuances of the word, a proper translation would be, “Without the Church there is no salvation.” This translation more accurately reflects the doctrinal meaning of the phrase.

Catholics United for the faith!

Lex orandi, lex credendi How you pray is how you believe!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top