Has the Bible Been Fabricated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Augustine3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As you say, there’s no “God revealed the Torah and the Gospel, but you can’t follow them anymore” qualification.
That makes sense.😃
Sometimes the Qur’an accuses Jews and Christians of not obeying what their own scriptures teach, forgetting or misunderstanding what their own scriptures teach, or of perverting the meaning of those scriptures. All of these accusations are based on the implicit assumption that there is nothing wrong with the scriptures Jews and Christians already have, because it would make little sense to rebuke someone for disobeying, ignoring, or misunderstanding something one doesn’t believe to be true in the first place.
:hypno:

😛
In at least one place, the Qur’an accuses some unspecified group of Jews, Christians, and/or Sabians of forgery for profit: “Woe, then, to those who write the book with their hands and then say: This is from God, so that they may take for it a small price; therefore woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn.” This passage does not, however, support the broader idea that all Jewish and Christian scriptures have been forged/corrupted or that all Jews and Christians are using forged/corrupted scriptures. The Qur’an itself does not say that.
Bolded part is very interesting.
From what I’ve seen, the now common Muslim belief that all Jewish and Christian scriptures have been forged/corrupted, or that all Jews and Christians are using forged/corrupted scriptures, is apparently an invention of medieval Muslims who were unable to reconcile (1) the good things the Qur’an says about Jewish and Christian scriptures with both (2) their faith in Muhammad’s other “revelations” and (3) what Jewish and Christian scriptures actually say. In order to save (2), they came to the conclusion that they had to reject (3).
Ah. I’d like to know more about this Medieval phenomena. Ive always felt there had been a change of attitude by Muslims to bolster seemingly legitimate claims for Islam against Jews and Christians. Any sources I can read about this? Might help me to refine my talks with a Muslim friend:)
 
Only Protestant Bible’s have been fabricated to suit their beliefs.
 
😃
Any sources I can read about this?
There are some short chapters about this in The Bible and the Qur’an by Dominican missionary and Islamic scholar Fr. Jacques Jomier, which is itself a brief overview-- chapter 6 in particular. The 12th chapter of Fr. Jomier’s How to Understand Islam also touches on this problem. Unfortunately, neither goes into too much detail (though some medieval Muslim scholars who did not believe all Jewish & Christian scriptures have been corrupted are named, and that’s interesting). Most Christian books, it seems to me, simply start from the Muslim assertion of corruption rather than investigating its origins (e.g. Geisler & Saleeb’s Answering Islam, chapter 10).

I would like to learn more about this, myself. I look forward to reading more about Gordon Nickel’s work with tampering narratives, for example.
 
  1. During Uthman time (after around 14 years of Muhammed death), Uthman burnt all versions of Quran and
    wrote his own version:
is there a proof of this? i would love to see this.
 
is there a proof of this? i would love to see this.
Here’s a Sunni website that includes a hadith from Sahih Bukhari regarding Uthman’s work:
Sahih Bukhari:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to 'Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur’an, so he said to 'Uthmfin, ‘O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Qur’an), as Jews and the Christians did before’. So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, ‘Send us the manuscripts of the Qur’an so that we may compile the Qur’anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you’. Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Sa’id bin Al-'As and 'Abdur Rahman bin Hari-bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, ‘In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur’an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish as the Qur’an was revealed in their tongue’. They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur’anic materials whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. Zaid bin Thabit added, ‘A verse from Sura al-Ahzab was missed by me when we copied the Qur’an and I used to hear Allah’s Apostle reciting it. So we searched for it and found it with Khuzaima bin Thabit Al-Ansari’. (That verse was): ‘Among the Believers are men who have been true in their convenant with Allah’ (33: 23).
 
Sorry Augustine3, I will reverse that, I will prove that the Quran has been fabricated ;)

1) During the time of Muhammed, some of the Quran had been written by his disciples when Muhammed used to recite them, they were written using early Arabic ancient script (no pointing and no vowel marks) on papyrus and leather fabric, however, some versus of Quran were not written at all but his disciples were memorizing them.

2) After Muhammed death Abu-Bakr ordered all versus of Quran to be written and assembled in one book.

That is true. This work was made by a commission that consist of clerks of revelation. Every clerk should verify a versus to take place in Qoran.

3) During Uthman time (after around 14 years of Muhammed death), Uthman burnt all versions of Quran and wrote his own version:

Qoran was reading in differents dialect and idiom of Arabic. To get unity in dialect Uthman wrote Qoran in Qureysh dialect. So there were no different Qorans.

4) During the 5th Umayyad Caliph (after around 70 years of Muhammed death), pointing and vowel marks were added to the original text:

That was a need because there were non-Arabic Muslims who do not know Arabic. But those pointings do not change Qoran.

5) Authentic hadiths show that some versus are missing:

These versus are not missing maybe changed according to time or that versus given to old prophets… here are:
  1. None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things? (Baqarah-106)
  2. When We substitute one revelation for another,- and Allah knows best what He reveals (in stages),- they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them know not. ( Nahl-101)
  3. Allah doth blot out or confirm what He pleaseth: with Him is the Mother of the Book.
    (Ra’d-39)
  4. He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book: In it are verses basic or fundamental (of established, clear meaning); they are the foundation of the Book: others are not entirely clear. But those in whose hearts is perversity follow the part thereof that is not clear, seeking discord, and searching for hidden meanings in it, but no one knows its interpretation except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: “We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord:” and none will grasp the Message except men of understanding. (Al-i İmran-7)
7) Nowadays we have different versions of Quran:

There is unique Qoran that was written and memorized by thousands and now by millions.
 
Sorry Augustine3, I will reverse that, I will prove that the Quran has been fabricated ;)

1) During the time of Muhammed, some of the Quran had been written by his disciples when Muhammed used to recite them, they were written using early Arabic ancient script (no pointing and no vowel marks) on papyrus and leather fabric, however, some versus of Quran were not written at all but his disciples were memorizing them.

That is true that Sahabe(Companion, disciples of Prophet) memorize versus. Also millions of Muslim always memorize entire of Qoran. But that is wrong that some versus were only memorized because there were clerks who write versus. So all versus were written by clerks of revelation.

Qoran was written in ancient Arabic script, that is true. But by time only form of script changed not writting.

Arabians read their Arabic writtings/passages without poiting and vowel marks. This is for who do not know Arabic to avoid reading false. Because by time more nations and non-Arabs accept İslam.
 
Sam_777;10656300:
Sorry Augustine3
, I will reverse that, I will prove that the Quran has been fabricated ;)

1) During the time of Muhammed, some of the Quran had been written by his disciples when Muhammed used to recite them, they were written using early Arabic ancient script (no pointing and no vowel marks) on papyrus and leather fabric, however, some versus of Quran were not written at all but his disciples were memorizing them.

That is true that Sahabe(Companion, disciples of Prophet) memorize versus( 3000 peoples). Also millions of Muslim always memorize entire of Qoran. But that is wrong that some versus were only memorized because there were clerks( they were 42 clerk) who write versus. So all versus were written by clerks of revelation.

Qoran was written in ancient Arabic script, that is true. But by time only form of script changed not writting.

Arabians read their Arabic writtings/passages without poiting and vowel marks. This is for who do not know Arabic to avoid reading false. Because by time more nations and non-Arabs accept İslam.
 
When a Muslim say that Bible has been fabricated that no means that entire Bible has been but some part certain that is a small percentage.

There are more than one Bible so minds are confused.

İn the Bibles it is not obvious that which words are revelation exactly, whichs are Jesus’ himself and whichs are Saint’s. Because there are degrees between them. İf a word is absolutely revelation it is certain but if not than conviction change. I think there must be division by degrees.

I have not read all Bibles but some. I decided to read. What I understand is that it is being confused about who exactly say the words in Bibles. Because some revelations that relates to God and expounding attributes of God are being reflected to Jesus. Some Saint’s comments are being considered as a part of revelation. I think base propblem is that. So if there is a corruption in Bibles that is comments that are being considered as revelation. Ofcourse Christians themselves must know or find better.
 
GOD IS A TAD BIGGER AND MORE COMPLEX THAN PEOPLE TEND TO THINK.

THE STRUCTURE OF REALITY IS ALSO MORE COMPLEX THAN PEOPLE TEND TO THINK.

God managed to place both proof of his existence, and proof of Jesus Christ’s existence with the KJV Bible of today, and did so in such a clever encoded manner.

Even today, that which we call the present, from his point of view, is ancient history.

To see the Codes, go to outersecrets.com/real/biblecode2a.htm

Click on the flashing words “Watch / Listen”, and let the webpage take you on a webpage tour of such proof.
 
Quibble: In reality, God is entirely simple. It’s everything else that’s complex. 🙂
 
When a Muslim say that Bible has been fabricated that no means that entire Bible has been but some part certain that is a small percentage.

There are more than one Bible so minds are confused.

İn the Bibles it is not obvious that which words are revelation exactly, whichs are Jesus’ himself and whichs are Saint’s. Because there are degrees between them. İf a word is absolutely revelation it is certain but if not than conviction change. I think there must be division by degrees.

I have not read all Bibles but some. I decided to read. What I understand is that it is being confused about who exactly say the words in Bibles. Because some revelations that relates to God and expounding attributes of God are being reflected to Jesus. Some Saint’s comments are being considered as a part of revelation. I think base propblem is that. So if there is a corruption in Bibles that is comments that are being considered as revelation. Ofcourse Christians themselves must know or find better.
The less Muslims try to understand the Bible but realize that it isn’t The Book that is most important but the Word of God The Person of Jesus Christ the Word made Flesh the less the frustration. Islam would have NEVER heard of Jesus if not of Christians.

Also Ignorance of history about Christians who faced horrid hardships under the Romans for their Faith must also be recognized. Historical grounds are vastly integral to understand the origins of Christianity.

Preconceived ideas or opinions do one no good. But a open and sincere heart and a little bit of common sense will show why it makes no sense to find use a book one thinks is faulty and try to micromanage things that appeal to ones preconceived ideas and jettison those parts that don’t appeal to that same sensitivity.

Context and full reading would be highly recommended 🙂

MJ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top