W
whatevergirl
Guest
LOL!Careful – we don’t want to inject common sense into the discussion.
Or as me sainted Irish Mither would say, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”
If someone kills someone else – cold blooded murder–the crime doesn’t suddenly become worse because there was prejudice involved. A life has been taken–a murder has occured. Now, motives do play a huge part in jury deliberations, but if a white person say, murders an african-american person–for no apparent reason other than hate…I suppose it would be construed that the white person was hateful. But, it doesn’t change the actual definition of what took place.
I wonder when and why society coined the phrase hate crime? I suppose when no other motives match…‘hate’ was the apparent motive. So…if a gunman comes in and shoots three bank tellers in cold blood…is that not hate? Money being the driving force behind murdering the bank tellers…doesn’t diminish the fact that the person obviously doesn’t have a whole lot of regard for human life.
Do I feel more sympathy for them, or for the gay person who is murdered, simply because he is gay? I would have the same amount of sympathy. Seems like the phrase ‘hate crime’ was coined to somehow make those particular murders, violent assaults, etc…look worse than if hate/prejudice/intolerance wasn’t the motive? I dunno…are there stiffer sentences for hate crimes? Maybe I should start by asking that!!