P
Prime
Guest
JPII says in his Evangelium Vitae:
'We have to go to the heart of the tragedy being experienced by modern man" the eclipse of the sense of God and of man, typical of a social and cultural climate dominated by secularism
… when God is forgotten the creature itself grows unintelligible… he is somehow reduced to being ‘a thing’ and no longer grasps the ‘trascendent’ character of his ‘existence as man’. He no longer considers life as a splendid gift of God, something sacred entrusted to his responsibility and thus to his loving care and ‘veneration’.
Is this phenomenon (absence of God and hence, man’s transcendence) in fact being felt or recognized by the ‘viewing public’ or is JPII’s cry an exaggeration?
I ask the same question as I see our world beset by so much social problems, yet with so many Nobel Prize winners getting awards for ‘contribution to solving the ills of the world’, humanity still wallows in material and spiritual poverty. Am I alone in this connective questioning?
Your take on this please?
'We have to go to the heart of the tragedy being experienced by modern man" the eclipse of the sense of God and of man, typical of a social and cultural climate dominated by secularism
… when God is forgotten the creature itself grows unintelligible… he is somehow reduced to being ‘a thing’ and no longer grasps the ‘trascendent’ character of his ‘existence as man’. He no longer considers life as a splendid gift of God, something sacred entrusted to his responsibility and thus to his loving care and ‘veneration’.
Is this phenomenon (absence of God and hence, man’s transcendence) in fact being felt or recognized by the ‘viewing public’ or is JPII’s cry an exaggeration?
I ask the same question as I see our world beset by so much social problems, yet with so many Nobel Prize winners getting awards for ‘contribution to solving the ills of the world’, humanity still wallows in material and spiritual poverty. Am I alone in this connective questioning?
Your take on this please?