Shouldnt the 1st recourse be to the priest himself, and then the Pastor of the parish, and only then to the Bishop of the Diocese? I am sure that most bishops have much more on their plate to handle than dealing with a mis-spoken absolution. I would always reccommend taking it up the “chain of command” before taking it to the “General”
The incident happened in the cathedral of his diocese, and I probably wouldn’t have seen the offending priest again, since he was a visiting priest and I didn’t know anything about him other than his name, and that he is a priest of that diocese.
Honestly, I was too shaken at the moment to think clearly enough to think to go talk to the priest himself.
So I wrote the pastor of the church, who also happened to be the bishop of the diocese as well.
But even if it wasn’t in the cathedral, if I were bishop, I would sure want to know if my priests were celebrating
invalid sacraments.
It is a most serious matter.
The church states that at any time, any catholic has the right to go straight to Rome, but it’s better if at all possible to start with the bishop. I also CCed the rector of the cathedral to make him aware, since as rector, he handles day-to-day operations in the cathedral parish, but I felt it was my duty to let the priest’s bishop know after something as serious as an invalid celebration of a sacrament.
This is something the bishop has a right to know about. It’s not so much about being a tattle tale, but more of a situation of “I went into the confessional to receive absolution, and I didn’t. You are the moderator of the liturgy, and this is your responsibility to deal with.”
Did that make sense? I was kind of rambling there…