Have you explored other religions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HauntedJame
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’d have to totally disagree with that statement, Julia. I certainly did not become blind to everything else when I began in earnest to seek the Lord. If anything I began to see more than I had ever imagined I could see. I found the True Light Who enlightens all men and I can assure you that this light did not make me see less but enabled me to see more.

I know plenty of people who are lost and wandering in darkness. I don’t want that. I want to be open to Truth, to Love, to Life, to the Lord, to Goodness, to Beauty, not to anything and everything because not everything is good or true or beautiful or loving or true, not every way leads to Life. Only One Way leads to Life and it was not my wandering that enabled me to find Him. It was Him calling me to stop my wandering and come home.

May the Peace of Christ be with you, Julia. Welcome nearly home! 🙂
Beautifully explained. 👍
 
Hi, Disciple96,

I would say that you have hit the nail squarely on the head.

God bless
Thanks, tqualey. I know it can be hard to give up wandering when one is filled with wanderlust. It can be addicting. But that’s just what we have to do, isn’t it? We have to give up insisting on doing things our way and listen to our Father in Heaven Who knows more about us and the world and what will truly make us happy and where our home truly is, than we pretend to know when we refuse to listen to Him. I know. I was in love with myself and my explorations and it was hard as heck for me to turn away from all that. But He kept calling. And I answered. And through away the things from that other time and set my feet on the path that would take me home.

Thank God! I never imagined the Church could be so beautiful! I never imagined I’d be able to say I love the Lord. But I do. Miserable disciple that I am. And I am!

Peace be with you, tqualey. 🙂
 
I’d have to totally disagree with that statement, Julia. I certainly did not become blind to everything else when I began in earnest to seek the Lord. If anything I began to see more than I had ever imagined I could see. I found the True Light Who enlightens all men and I can assure you that this light did not make me see less but enabled me to see more.

I know plenty of people who are lost and wandering in darkness. I don’t want that. I want to be open to Truth, to Love, to Life, to the Lord, to Goodness, to Beauty, not to anything and everything because not everything is good or true or beautiful or loving or true, not every way leads to Life. Only One Way leads to Life and it was not my wandering that enabled me to find Him. It was Him calling me to stop my wandering and come home.

May the Peace of Christ be with you, Julia. Welcome nearly home! 🙂
You do have a point there. I was thinking about some people who are so focused on their goal that they didn’t see everything around them.

This makes me think of a story someone told me. A student asked the teacher, “if I study hard, how long will it take me to learn everything?” The teacher said, “3 years”. Then the student asked, “What if I try really hard?” The teacher replied, “4 years”. Then the student asked, “What if I try really, really, really hard?” To this, the teacher answered, “5 years”. The student was frustrated and asked, “Why is it that if I work harder, it will take longer?” The teacher replied, “When you have one eye on the goal, you only have one eye on the path”.

When I made that statement, I was mostly referring to people who were so focused on their one path, that they couldn’t or rather wouldn’t see anything else. Sorry, I should have made that clear.
 
(Sounds like someone’s been reading Joseph Campbell et al. Oh, does that bring back memories of days long past…)

Being raised by wolves…I would liken this to a private relationship with God, one that cannot be shared with those around you. (I doubt that the wolves would understand the quest at all.) God is about community, relationship, communing as in communication, loving, serving, cultivating of the interior (not private but interior, not private but personal) life. About becoming truly human, as human as you can possibly be. Being raised by wolves would not help you do any of those things. You would be trapped in an animal’s life with no way to develop into what you were meant to be.

An image that makes me shudder. Even if I do like wolves, and I do, I don’t want to be one.
Actually I never have read Joseph Campbell, though I’m not sure about the “et al,” as I don’t know who Campbell’s “et al” would be! 😉 But I only used this wolves example as a metaphor – like a tabula rasa. I’m not being literal, just attempting to build up an example where you could theoretically exist independent of outside influence (apart from the wolves, of course!).

My quest is personal, which you pointed out. I think it can be personal. I know you said that your idea of a religious quest is a public one, shared by others. That may work for you and for others, and I don’t doubt that for one second. For me, I have found God when I was able to quietly sit and pray, and be in a peaceful setting without interference. I don’t think it violates any of God’s laws to come to Him privately on your own. The group thing just doesn’t work for me – I am distracted by the other people, their personalities. Perhaps this is simply because people fascinate me and my attention is then drawn away from my spiritual endeavors! Simply food for thought.
 
Actually I never have read Joseph Campbell, though I’m not sure about the “et al,” as I don’t know who Campbell’s “et al” would be! 😉 But I only used this wolves example as a metaphor – like a tabula rasa. I’m not being literal, just attempting to build up an example where you could theoretically exist independent of outside influence (apart from the wolves, of course!).

My quest is personal, which you pointed out. I think it can be personal. I know you said that your idea of a religious quest is a public one, shared by others. That may work for you and for others, and I don’t doubt that for one second. For me, I have found God when I was able to quietly sit and pray, and be in a peaceful setting without interference. I don’t think it violates any of God’s laws to come to Him privately on your own. The group thing just doesn’t work for me – I am distracted by the other people, their personalities. Perhaps this is simply because people fascinate me and my attention is then drawn away from my spiritual endeavors! Simply food for thought.
Hi, Light! 🙂

I don’t think I used the word “public”. It’s not public, it’s not private. It’s personal and lived in community, hence the necessity for the human connection. Yes, necessity. Of the human connection, the communion of the saints, the Church.

There’s nothing wrong with sitting quietly with God, I enjoy that myself. Adoration is wonderful, I love to spend time before the Blessed Sacrament in the Tabernacle. But you aren’t alone when you’re sitting quietly with God. We are always in the company of the saints and angels. Really. Not just a pretty phrase. And even God is the Trinity. God is a Family, a Communion of Persons.

The Joseph Campbell reference was to this notion that has been very popular for many years, the notion that all religions are basically the same. You don’t have to read Campbell to read his ideas, they have spread like a virus, like kudzu. 😉 He made that idea so popular that a large number of writers and teachers now take it for granted without ever bothering to look closely at it, much less attempting to prove it. Which they can’t, because all religions are not the same, all paths do not lead to the same goal.

There’s plenty of counterfeit “spirituality” out there, plenty of false teachers, plenty of lies disguised as truth. And plenty of paths that seem promising in the beginning that don’t lead to green pastures but mosquito-ridden swamps instead. Take care.

Peace be with you, Light.
 
You do have a point there. I was thinking about some people who are so focused on their goal that they didn’t see everything around them…When I made that statement, I was mostly referring to people who were so focused on their one path, that they couldn’t or rather wouldn’t see anything else. Sorry, I should have made that clear.
I understood. But I know what I experienced. I traveled many paths, searching, wandering, listened to many people who called themselves teachers. Studied religions. Sometimes one can be focused on wandering and not notice the true path that leads to the true goal opening up right before one. Head swiveling this way and that, trying to see everything. This life is brief, fleeting…

The next one is eternal. Be wise.

Peace be with you, Julia. 🙂
 
Indeed. I do believe we have have God within us – I actually even believe that all matter, living and non-living, is God, so naturally we find Him within – and I do greatly value the experience of coming to know Him, independent of the outside world.
Light, I know what you are saying. The topic reminds so very much of a conversation I had with someone only recently. Incidentally, I do think you accidentally chose a poor metaphor, about the wolves, if only because wolves are symbolic of predators who traditionally eat lambs, and lambs are highly connected with Christianity. It is silly reasoning, but people are more influenced by symbol than they care to realize, or even understand, and you must consider this whenever posing a persuasive speech.

I work at a religious establishment that welcomes all people as Christ, including those of other religions. One visitor was an ex-Catholic, and I am a non-Catholic being drawn closer to Catholicism, so we fell into a fascinating discussion. It was interesting because he is going where I am coming from, and much that he was just learning, I already knew.

This guy – I’ll call him Todd – grew up in a strict family that taught that only Catholics were saved. (My Baptist Grandmother felt the same about Baptists. It’s funny when you stand away and listen to both sides go at it.) He had come later to realize this just wasn’t so, and therefore felt his faith had lied to him. I think he had an unfortunate experience. Many of the Catholics that I know, including some priests, point out that the Catechism has a reserved spot for non-Catholic, because since God alone grants salvation, and no one can fathom the mind of God, it is possible (though less likely, says the Church) for non-Catholics to find God and be saved. For example, Moses never knew Christ, nor did Esther. The spiritual sin comes, not from ignorance, since God sees the inner heart, but from deliberately rejecting God. But, back to my story, he’d felt the Church had lied to him. He’d also read up on scholars who now determine some of Paul’s books weren’t really Paul’s - but I won’t go into that long topic on this post. Suffice it to say, I knew a whole lot already, and have come to realize there’s not necessarily a contradiction.

Todd had been looking at Eastern religions. I feel that Eastern religions are beautiful, and I reject the idea that religion is about community. Community is one part of religion, a very important part, but ultimately, God has to save us from the inside out. Religion is a seed that another person (or situation) plants within you, but it has to grow within you according to your own choice and understanding. So the inside part of religion is incredibly important. The pharisees were very good at relating to others on a religious level, but Jesus saw beyond when he said their cup was dirty inside.

What Todd had failed to realize, however, was that this inside part is also within Christianity – it’s just underemphasized nowadays. Many holy Christians used to become hermits because they wanted to seek God through isolation: they felt that removing distractions of the world could help them see God more clearly. Nuns still do that, and friars sometimes. Myself, I believe the balance a person needs between communal and internal religion is unique, just as studying techniques are, for different people. Community really serves to support the internal spirituality, not replace it. One might say, however, that just as the internal side is underemphasized in Western religion, the communal side is underemphasized in Eastern. I think Todd could have found what he was looking for, if he had looked at his own religion with new eyes. But sometimes you have to get a distance away first, to do that.

I know what you mean by feeling hungry. I felt it for years, and although my parents did an admirable job teaching me, it’s a hunger that doesn’t go away until you find God on your own. You can stay in the same religion, but you still have to go through a process where you realize Him all for yourself. For me, that meant having the liberty to leap out on faith and decide for myself where God wanted me to go, instead of relying on other people’s judgment of what God wanted for me. I feel more internally satisfied than I ever have in my life.

As to the other part, you may like the Bible passage that reads God is in all, and of all, and above all. One of my favorites.
 
FaithG wrote: Religion is a seed that another person (or situation) plants within you, but it has to grow within you according to your own choice and understanding.
But that’s just it, Faith. The Holy Spirit plants a seed within you at Baptism. But it grows according to God’s will and your co-operation. The Christian path involves becoming more and more like Christ. And Christ not once preferred His Own Will to the Will of His Father. That is precisely the thing that trips up so many people who attempt to walk in the Way. They insist on serving their own wills, desires, and designs. It’s a bit like telling God that you’re “just fine on your own and you don’t really need His help, thank you very much, for I know better than You do, Sir.”

I don’t think I said that religion is about community. I think I said that the Trinity is a communion of Persons and that we are made in the image of the Trinity. We hear the Word of God in the Christian community of believers; we learn how to follow Christ in the community called the Church, the Church that He founded for a reason. I don’t think Jesus makes mistakes or does anything haphazardly or for no purpose. He founded the Church, gave the Church the Holy Spirit to guide her, and did not leave us to stumble in the darkness, left to our own devices.

To reject God’s help is not the way to follow His Son. When God offers help, why not take His help and walk in the path He showed us? He showed us the best way. Christ is the Way, the Truth and the Life. Forever. Amen.

Peace be with you, Faith. I’m glad you are feeling drawn to the Catholic faith. It’s truly beautiful and, most importantly, it’s beautifully true! 🙂
 
Light, I know what you are saying. The topic reminds so very much of a conversation I had with someone only recently. Incidentally, I do think you accidentally chose a poor metaphor, about the wolves, if only because wolves are symbolic of predators who traditionally eat lambs, and lambs are highly connected with Christianity. It is silly reasoning, but people are more influenced by symbol than they care to realize, or even understand, and you must consider this whenever posing a persuasive speech.

Thank you Disciple, and thank you Faith! I enjoyed your responses so much. I am sorry I mistook your words, Disciple, and used the term “public.” I didn’t mean to misconstrue your meaning! And I appreciate what you said. In the sense of God being a Trinity, and the Angels also being present, as well as the saints, etc. – this I do feel in touch with, and I am most grateful for that. I’ve posted elsewhere (one thread discussed Archangel Raphael, and another, Guardian Angels) that I do feel close with the Angels. I have certain saints that mean a lot to me, too. I often pray to Archangels Raphael, Michael, Gabriel and Uriel, and also to my Guardian Angel (or to the Guardian Angel of a person I am worried about), and to St. Theresa of Avilla. In my family we also take St. Joseph as a Patron Saint (kind of like St. Patrick for the Irish – St. Joseph is the Italian Patron Saint) and we also pray to St. Jude. It’s family tradition!

I do share my spiritual quest with others, “My family,” a small spiritual group of people I’m close to, and we consider one another “Prayer Partners.” We pray for each other, and we focus group prayers towards areas about which we feel concern (the Gulf Oil Crisis, for instance; the wars in the Middle East; those in Africa and China who are struck by AIDS, famine or other hardship; etc.). One of my Prayer Partners is a Jewish woman who is twice my age (and one of my closest friends!), another is an Evangelical Christian woman whom I went to school with, and another is a non-religious person who was raised Methodist and who know has no particular faith tradition. Still, each of us have come to respect and to know God in our own ways, and we approach our prayers with utmost sincerity. This small community doesn’t form a “Church” or even a Synagogue in a traditional sense, but perhaps adheres to the directive that when a group is joined in worship, they do meet up with their Maker.

Faith, you make a good point about the “wolves” scenario being poorly chosen, due to one’s association with wolves! I hadn’t thought of that. Indeed, I used the wolves scenario only because it was handy (I’d heard it before), and only to suggest that I believe a person could be raised outside society and yet still “find God” without being directed to Him. Also, the reason I feel comfortable with “wolves” is because I had a German Shepherd as a child! So I feel naturally close to wolves, and wasn’t thinking about any other associations people might have with them. 🙂

It’s very interesting, Disciple, that Joseph Campbell suggested that “All religions meet up with God,” and yet I’d not even heard his stance before.

I always wondered: “Did multiple people invent the wheel? Did the idea keep occurring to humans over and over and over again, so that one person might have been the first to conceive of it, and yet, without having that knowledge, others came to the idea on their own, repeatedly, throughout time?” We may not know the answer to that, but I do believe that this analogy applies to God. It appears to me that with ancient peoples being so disparate, both in area and in culture, tradition and belief, we still witness thousands of instances of “religious” (or faith traditions) existing thousands of years ago – in some cases, hundreds of thousands of years ago (if cave paintings can be accurately interpreted). I guess I find it beautiful for God to be able to witness this, and to be able to see and to know that even before His Holy Books could have been studied and learned, individuals the world over sought to find Him – and in their own ways, perhaps, they did.

I appreciate so much the ways you have tried to understand where I am coming from, and I know that is not easy, from within a specific faith tradition, to recognize the sincerity of a non-religious person. I am very moved by the community you all form together, and by the way you’ve welcomed me to join you in my questions, my interests, and my faith.

I’ve enjoyed what you’ve all shared and I have taken your suggestions and ideas into consideration! I always seek to grow in my understanding.

Peace to each one of you,
Light1111
 
Yes. I was raised Lutheran, was LDS for a few years and then bounced around looking for the truth before I found it as a Catholic. I never attended a B’Hai (sp) service, but I read about and studied it for a short time.
you were a mormon for a while did u like it
 
It’s very interesting, Disciple, that Joseph Campbell suggested that “All religions meet up with God,” and yet I’d not even heard his stance before.

I always wondered: “Did multiple people invent the wheel? Did the idea keep occurring to humans over and over and over again, so that one person might have been the first to conceive of it, and yet, without having that knowledge, others came to the idea on their own, repeatedly, throughout time?” We may not know the answer to that, but I do believe that this analogy applies to God. It appears to me that with ancient peoples being so disparate, both in area and in culture, tradition and belief, we still witness thousands of instances of “religious” (or faith traditions) existing thousands of years ago – in some cases, hundreds of thousands of years ago (if cave paintings can be accurately interpreted). I guess I find it beautiful for God to be able to witness this, and to be able to see and to know that even before His Holy Books could have been studied and learned, individuals the world over sought to find Him – and in their own ways, perhaps, they did.

Peace to each one of you,
Light1111
Oh, I definitely believe that people all over the world have tried in their own ways, to find God and to worship Him. But only to the Hebrews did He reveal Himself. The other ways, I think, represent man reaching up to God. But God revealing Himself to man is God reaching down to man. And God has much longer arms! 😃

Once God has revealed Himself to us, there is no need for us to “reinvent the wheel”. We do better to listen to our loving Father Who will guide us into all wisdom and knowledge. He gave us a brain and we use it. That’s why the Church teaches that man flies by two wings: Faith and Reason.

St. Paul speaks of this in Romans. He also talks about it in Acts where he meets with the Greeks in the Areopagus. The times of darkness are at an end. He Who is Light has been revealed, has become flesh and has lived among us.

Peace be with you, Light. I’m glad you found the forum community too! 🙂
 
Oh, I definitely believe that people all over the world have tried in their own ways, to find God and to worship Him. But only to the Hebrews did He reveal Himself. The other ways, I think, represent man reaching up to God. But God revealing Himself to man is God reaching down to man. And God has much longer arms! 😃

Once God has revealed Himself to us, there is no need for us to “reinvent the wheel”. We do better to listen to our loving Father Who will guide us into all wisdom and knowledge. He gave us a brain and we use it. That’s why the Church teaches that man flies by two wings: Faith and Reason.

St. Paul speaks of this in Romans. He also talks about it in Acts where he meets with the Greeks in the Areopagus. The times of darkness are at an end. He Who is Light has been revealed, has become flesh and has lived among us.

Peace be with you, Light. I’m glad you found the forum community too! 🙂
There isn’t any way of knowing for sure that your religion is correct. And if you fly by Faith in the wrong direction… With so many religions around, it is really confusing. Especially since each one has its own “proofs”.
 
Hi, Julia1996,

I must admit, your response really did surprise me… not only for making such an absolute statement - but for making one that is so absolutely wrong! :eek: Let me explain that advocating for relativism is the same as advocating for despair!
There isn’t any way of knowing for sure that your religion is correct. And if you fly by Faith in the wrong direction… With so many religions around, it is really confusing. Especially since each one has its own “proofs”.
First up - we have all been bombarded by atheists who loudly proclaim that there is no God… and they really try to make their non-religion religion the hottest topic to embrace. Of course, they are found to idolize their own opinions…but, I guess that is another issue! One of the best arguments against this nonsense is the use of your own senses. Just look around and listen to nature. Feel the order as you let earth and water run through your hands, Smell the roses. Did you make any of this? Do you know anyone who did? How did this all of this creation get made without a Maker, without a Creator? And, if you want to go beyond the limition of your physical senses on the proofs for the existence of God, check out this link on St. Thomas Aquinas: saintaquinas.com/belief_in_God.html Now while natural man can PROVE the existence of God - to the annoyance of atheists - we can not prove that that He sent His Only Begotten Son to suffer and die to redeem us from our sins. This takes faith.

So if you want the sure way to PROVE which religion is ‘correct’ you will have to honestly explore the human history of Jesus Christ. While there were numerous predictions about the Messiah in the Old Testament - why even the relligious leaders at the time of Herod knew He was to be born in Bethlahem - why not just being with the New Testament account of Christ’s earthly ministry?

What is significant is that Christ founded His Chruch on Peter, gave this sinful and boastful fisherman the authority of a ‘blank check’ to bind and lose (Matt 16:18) any and all things necessary for the Church of Christ (and, that would be the Catholic Church). And, Christ did this with the full knowledge that Peter would drop the ball many times and in the very next verse, Christ calls Peter a devil! :eek:

Christ appears to the Apostles and tells Peter to continue to lead - to feed the lambs and sheep of Christ (John 21:15). Note, Christ did not appear to Luther and command him to break away from the Body of Christ - He did not appear to Calvin to command him to trash the Church founded by Christ - He did not appear to Henry VIII and tell him that he was now in charge of Christ’s Church.

Ultimately,in my opinion, exploring other religions is about as enlightened as claiming to want to travel to New York from California and refusing to look at a map - insisting, instead, to look at the appearance of the roads you want to travel. The implicit claim is that a pleasant road will surely get me to where I want to go. Unfortunately, those who advocate relativism insist that all roads are equal or that any road is as good as another, or finally that no road will take you where you want to go - so, stop wanting to to there! And those who believe this lie remain lost for as long as they insist that man-made religions are ‘OK’ - and since they are all man-made, it makes no difference. How could one possible ‘fly by Faith in the wrong direction’ - when they are all wrong?! :eek:

Relativism is the kiss of death for anyone sincerely interested in following Christ through the Church He founded on Peter and is now being lead by Benedict XVI.

God bless
 
Hi, Julia1996,

I must admit, your response really did surprise me… not only for making such an absolute statement - but for making one that is so absolutely wrong! :eek: Let me explain that advocating for relativism is the same as advocating for despair!

First up - we have all been bombarded by atheists who loudly proclaim that there is no God… and they really try to make their non-religion religion the hottest topic to embrace. Of course, they are found to idolize their own opinions…but, I guess that is another issue! One of the best arguments against this nonsense is the use of your own senses. Just look around and listen to nature. Feel the order as you let earth and water run through your hands, Smell the roses. Did you make any of this? Do you know anyone who did? How did this all of this creation get made without a Maker, without a Creator? And, if you want to go beyond the limition of your physical senses on the proofs for the existence of God, check out this link on St. Thomas Aquinas: saintaquinas.com/belief_in_God.html Now while natural man can PROVE the existence of God - to the annoyance of atheists - we can not prove that that He sent His Only Begotten Son to suffer and die to redeem us from our sins. This takes faith.

So if you want the sure way to PROVE which religion is ‘correct’ you will have to honestly explore the human history of Jesus Christ. While there were numerous predictions about the Messiah in the Old Testament - why even the relligious leaders at the time of Herod knew He was to be born in Bethlahem - why not just being with the New Testament account of Christ’s earthly ministry?

What is significant is that Christ founded His Chruch on Peter, gave this sinful and boastful fisherman the authority of a ‘blank check’ to bind and lose (Matt 16:18) any and all things necessary for the Church of Christ (and, that would be the Catholic Church). And, Christ did this with the full knowledge that Peter would drop the ball many times and in the very next verse, Christ calls Peter a devil! :eek:

Christ appears to the Apostles and tells Peter to continue to lead - to feed the lambs and sheep of Christ (John 21:15). Note, Christ did not appear to Luther and command him to break away from the Body of Christ - He did not appear to Calvin to command him to trash the Church founded by Christ - He did not appear to Henry VIII and tell him that he was now in charge of Christ’s Church.

Ultimately,in my opinion, exploring other religions is about as enlightened as claiming to want to travel to New York from California and refusing to look at a map - insisting, instead, to look at the appearance of the roads you want to travel. The implicit claim is that a pleasant road will surely get me to where I want to go. Unfortunately, those who advocate relativism insist that all roads are equal or that any road is as good as another, or finally that no road will take you where you want to go - so, stop wanting to to there! And those who believe this lie remain lost for as long as they insist that man-made religions are ‘OK’ - and since they are all man-made, it makes no difference. How could one possible ‘fly by Faith in the wrong direction’ - when they are all wrong?! :eek:

Relativism is the kiss of death for anyone sincerely interested in following Christ through the Church He founded on Peter and is now being lead by Benedict XVI.

God bless
Sorry, I should have taken a bit more time in typing that to make sure that I made my point clear. What I meant is that while there isn’t absolute proof that we are worshiping the one true God, there also isn’t proof that we aren’t. As long as nobody can prove it either way, you are going to have unbelievers.

The thing is here, if you could prove that God exists, and also prove that we are worshiping the one true God, then we wouldn’t have a religion anymore, it would be science. And we are saved by Faith, if we can prove something, then where is the Faith?
 
It’s very interesting, Disciple, that Joseph Campbell suggested that “All religions meet up with God,” and yet I’d not even heard his stance before.

I always wondered: “Did multiple people invent the wheel? Did the idea keep occurring to humans over and over and over again, so that one person might have been the first to conceive of it, and yet, without having that knowledge, others came to the idea on their own, repeatedly, throughout time?” We may not know the answer to that, but I do believe that this analogy applies to God. It appears to me that with ancient peoples being so disparate, both in area and in culture, tradition and belief, we still witness thousands of instances of “religious” (or faith traditions) existing thousands of years ago – in some cases, hundreds of thousands of years ago (if cave paintings can be accurately interpreted). I guess I find it beautiful for God to be able to witness this, and to be able to see and to know that even before His Holy Books could have been studied and learned, individuals the world over sought to find Him – and in their own ways, perhaps, they did.
I was raised Catholic and was very devoted, well catechized, and proselytized with zeal. I had a series of mystical experiences that unexpectedly and unceremoniously pulled the rug out from every concept I had of what it means to be a person. No Catholic teaching of clerics or books that I pursued had any reasonable answer for what happened to me and what it meant. I finally started to follow clues outside the Church. I was exceptionally well rewarded, and these last 46 years of practice and application have been practical exercises fortifying my conviction of my present stance.

I ended up in the association, and then employ, of a remarkable man who introduced me to a radical take on the nature of religion through the perspective of Conscious Awareness. He was someone who talked his walk with absolute consistency, as far as I could tell, over the nearly 30 years I knew him. Among his frequent visitors was Mr. Don Campbell. Every visit proved to be a fascinating exchange between my Mentor and Mr. Campbell. I particularly enjoyed his Hero With a Thousand Faces. Most people read it as comparative mythology, but from what unfolded in conversations I witnessed, it was much more than that.

To make a long story short, it was the living example of my Mentor and his ability to guide individuals of any faith or philosophy through impasses of faith or scholarship that convinced me of his accuracy in conveying what surely had to be the State from which religion itself springs. But religion is a mere shadow of that State. That is not surprising, for two reasons. First, the original revelation of a Jesus or a Buddha is not from the same state of awareness we ordinarily use to navigate these four dimensions we call “life.” Second, because that State was not shared or shallower in followers, the revelation was organized into relative uselessness and increased misunderstanding over time. CS Lewis was right about this point.

This cannot be clear either to anyone who has not had a deep insight, or to anyone who operates on a strictly subject/object mode of engagement with life as most people do. It will be rejected by intellectual assertions strongly associated with very sincere emotional commitments attached to religious ideals. That is not surprising, as since we all go through stages in awareness development from uterine experience onward, we are heavily impressed with the emotional rationalizations of our parents and peers. This is why even “conversions” are usually within the fold of Christianity, say here in the West. But while religion might be about God, God is not about religion. God is about Reality, or what does not change.

But there is something far deeper than the albeit sincere promulgation of religious systems. It has cropped up from time immemorial in every land despite culture, date, religion, economics, gender, or whatever factor might apply. In many or most cases it appears as an individual realization or awakening. That might be easily dismissible, save that significant numbers of these individuals didn’t even have contact with each other even through literature and yet speak with authority in remarkably similar terms and structures. And in the case of the few Catholic ones, whose poetry make me weep and laugh with joy along with the others, and with a few others, there were constraints on their expressions which they overcame within the confines of the language of faith or of romance.

What I am saying is that there is a stream of Knowledge that is both ancient and Universally fundamental that is always overlooked by the mere instruments of faith, dogma, and tradition. Faith may apply insofar as one who has a conviction that they are more than what they seem to be and are driven by a deep conviction of Love. But similar experiences have resulted as well from great discipline, and form shock or trauma, or even despair. Those are not uncommon, and with good reason.

So having a religion is well and good, but faith tends to be divisive simply by the nature of it being a belief system. Those who actually acquire Knowledge are on a far different footing. A certain parable comes to mind.

But there it is. If you don’t believe it, that is fine. I have no personal investment in a result here, only of providing what might be a cubic centimeter of chance for someone, if they so wish. Blessings and Love on you all.
 
Hi, Julia1996,

Maybe this idea needs to be explored in more depth…🙂
Sorry, I should have taken a bit more time in typing that to make sure that I made my point clear. What I meant is that while there isn’t absolute proof that we are worshiping the one true God, there also isn’t proof that we aren’t.

Are we making a distinction between ‘proof’ and ‘absolute proof’? It may be a good idea to define what you mean by ‘absolute proof’. …🙂

As long as nobody can prove it either way, you are going to have unbelievers.

We are not talking about scientific ideas which are subject to change with further study (like the geocentric model of the universe giving way in the early 17th Century to the heliocentric model).

At a horse race, many people have opinions about which horse will win the race - and informaiton about the horse and track are provided (for a fee) and people wager money on a particular horse. At the end of the race, there are no opinions as to the outcomes - but, there is an abundance of proof!

I am reminded of the letter written by St. James who seems to address this concern (James 2:14-26) where issues of Faith had been totally confused. What makes this so interesting is that this is the only place where ‘faith alone’ appears in the Bible - and it is condemned!
.
**14
What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him?
15
If a brother or sister has nothing to wear and has no food for the day,
16
and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, keep warm, and eat well,” but you do not give them the necessities of the body, what good is it?
17
So also faith of itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
18
Indeed someone might say, “You have faith and I have works.” Demonstrate your faith to me without works, and I will demonstrate my faith to you from my works.
19
You believe that God is one. You do well. Even the demons believe that and tremble.
20
Do you want proof, you ignoramus, that faith without works is useless?
21
Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar?
22
You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by the works.
23
Thus the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called “the friend of God.”
24
See how a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.
25
And in the same way, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she welcomed the messengers and sent them out by a different route?
26
For just as a body without a spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead. **

The thing is here, if you could prove that God exists, and also prove that we are worshiping the one true God, then we wouldn’t have a religion anymore, it would be science. And we are saved by Faith, if we can prove something, then where is the Faith?
I think we can ‘prove’ God exists, Julia1996, and I gave you a link to proofs given by St. Thomas Aquinas in an earlier post. What we can not ‘prove’ is what John 3:16 is all about - that God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son so that we may live. That takes Faith!

It is the worship of God - not only believe in Him but in our behavior as to how we express that belief - that look at as religion. It is the Faith that keeps us going - of continuing to do good in His Name because we believe what He told us. And, as I see it, that is really where the action is for us creatures… for us Children of God. 🙂

God bless
 
God is not amenable to “proofs,” as rationality is but one aspect of mind and restricted to the usual subject/object mode of experience. No Thomistic or any other proof is useful here. Remember, you are talking about a Great Man who wanted to burn all his works as they proved inadequate in the light of his Revelation. Are his works masterpieces of intellection? Most certainly. But along with Teresa of Avila, Catherine of Sienna, Francis of Assisi, John of the Cross, Meister Eckhart, and perhaps a few others, it is their poetry that reveals more than other assertions limited to reason. The apprehension of God is not intellectual, though after Experience that aspect of mind may be used as a limited pointer in the hands of one with Vision. The Vision informs the reason, not visa versa. That is why the Identity statements in both the OT and NT take on a completely different significance when seen from another perspective. “proofs” are place holders for searchers until the Grace of Knowledge descends. They are of very limited use in the end; when a structure of significance is built, all such scaffolding is taken away.

The “faith and works” pairing only points to the needfulness of understanding the Unitary Principle behind the Great Commandment, the four forms of the Golden rule, and the ages old dictum to Know Thyself.
 
Hi, Tuno,

You are right when you say that God is not amenable - but, the ‘proofs’ are not for Him - rather, they are for us. The idea that St. Thomas had was to demonstrate from natural reason that God existance can be proven. The desire to accept or reject these proofs is strictly up to you. If you can disprove them, I would be interested in reading what you have to say. Here is a link you may find helpful; aquinasonline.com/Topics/5ways.html

Actually, I think St. Thomas’ proofs are not only quite useful but establish a definitive stand against those who claim there is no God or God existence can not be demonstrated. Again, the pages of history are quite full of early man’s recognition of a Power greater than man Who brought all of creation into existence. This is not a point to be easily dismissed.
God is not amenable to “proofs,” as rationality is but one aspect of mind and restricted to the usual subject/object mode of experience. No Thomistic or any other proof is useful here. Remember, you are talking about a Great Man who wanted to burn all his works as they proved inadequate in the light of his Revelation. Are his works masterpieces of intellection? Most certainly. But along with Teresa of Avila, Catherine of Sienna, Francis of Assisi, John of the Cross, Meister Eckhart, and perhaps a few others, it is their poetry that reveals more than other assertions limited to reason. The apprehension of God is not intellectual, though after Experience that aspect of mind may be used as a limited pointer in the hands of one with Vision. The Vision informs the reason, not visa versa. That is why the Identity statements in both the OT and NT take on a completely different significance when seen from another perspective. “proofs” are place holders for searchers until the Grace of Knowledge descends. They are of very limited use in the end; when a structure of significance is built, all such scaffolding is taken away.

The “faith and works” pairing only points to the needfulness of understanding the Unitary Principle behind the Great Commandment, the four forms of the Golden rule, and the ages old dictum to Know Thyself.
Actually, the section I quoted from St. James was to clearly identify that even the devils believe in God - and this does not help them. I am not sure what the “Unitary Principle” (physics? biology?) has to do with this - so, please clarify.

God bless
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top