Having children is selfish

  • Thread starter Thread starter dafalax
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
To each his own. If they want to have children galore so be it. If they don’t want to have any so be it.
 
To each his own. If they want to have children galore so be it. If they don’t want to have any so be it.
I agree, you can either have kids or not, it’s your choice. But for goodness’ sake, don’t slap a moral stance on your not wanting children. It’s sick.
 
I agree, you can either have kids or not, it’s your choice. But for goodness’ sake, don’t slap a moral stance on your not wanting children. It’s sick.
Never did and never will. But in the interests of fairness don’t slap a moral stance that every couple must be a baby manufacturing outfit. That would be sick as well.
 
Back to the OP:
While most parents view their children as the ultimate miracle of nature, Toni seems to see them as a sinister threat to the future.
This struck me as particularly absurd. Having children is a threat to the future of the planet; therefore, we must stop having children in order to help preserve our planet for our descend…ants…waaaaaaaaaaiiiit a second…

Peace,
Dante
 
As the lady in the article so clearly demonstrated, she simply had an abortion. They keep on having sex but will use an abortion like many of us use a towel to dry our hands.

For these people the world is more of a living breathing entity then any person is let alone an innocent baby. It truly saddens me as to the way these people think. But what saddens me even more is when these women get older and have no families or children. The pain and suffering of these women has not even begun. Look at all the nursing homes with the elderly patients who’s kids don’t come to visit and the saddness it brings. The ederly that never had kids, will never even know the joys of that saddness but will know something much worse.😦

The little footprints we all should seek have nothing to do with carbon but come with the pitter patter of little feet and a smile like the sun.
Yeah this annoys me too. People who are demonstrating their rightousness by not harming the enironment, but are still willing to have sex as often as they want, while closing their bodies to human life.
Well the great thing about the secularist/relativist/ atheistic/environmental wackos is they don’t want to reproduce, the don’t eat meat and they don’t like guns, so if they ever try to impose their insanity on the rest of us, they will be few, weak, and poorly armed 😉
But the mind and influence of a person is stronger than man-made weapons.
Nihilism is one of the main tenets of the Secular Relativist. What develops from it is a self centeredness that is so prevalent today. Self has replaced God in society today.

As for children, they are a blessing and there is no such thing has having too many.
In this case environmentalism has replaced God.
 
Never did and never will. But in the interests of fairness don’t slap a moral stance that every couple must be a baby manufacturing outfit. That would be sick as well.
I never said that, and I don’t believe that. Don’t put words in my mouth please.
 
Well the great thing about the secularist/relativist/ atheistic/environmental wackos is they don’t want to reproduce, the don’t eat meat and they don’t like guns, so if they ever try to impose their insanity on the rest of us, they will be few, weak, and poorly armed 😉
Whoa whoa whoa *The few and poorly armed *I will let slide but saying that ppl who are vegetarians are weak is an INSULT:mad: . I am a very strict vegetarian… I’m also very strong and athletic. I’m an avid snowboarder. I’m a health and wellness major so I know a thing or two about nutrition. Next time do some research before you start making up stuff about people who don’t eat animals or animal products. That just adds to the ignorance about it. We eat too yknow. We just don’t eat animals or things that come out their bodies. But we eat everything else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top