P
PeteZaHut
Guest
When should you forgive someone and let it go, and when should you turn someone in to the police, assuming that the crime committed only affects you and the person who did the act?
You are attempting to obtain one answer to at least two entirely separate questions. To forgive is required; to “let it go” is too vague a term to evaluate without further explanation.When should you forgive someone and let it go, and when should you turn someone in to the police, assuming that the crime committed only affects you and the person who did the act?
Interestingly, I was looking at the CCC regarding the death penalty and also self-defense. Not quite exactly related, but still a similar.If you don’t report the people to the police… what keeps them from doing it again to you or someone else???
forgiveness does not imply “letting it go” and failing to report criminal actions to the police. forgiveness is about your own internal attitude toward the sin and the sinner. You do not forgive the sin, you forgive the sinner, and release yourself from the bondage of resentment, recrimnation and bitterness. You are not doing the criminal any favors by not reporting the crime, you are enabling him to continue doing it and perhaps putting others in danger.When should you forgive someone and let it go, and when should you turn someone in to the police, assuming that the crime committed only affects you and the person who did the act?
Absolutely.depends on the crime.
I don’t usually post in this part of the forum, but the thinking error in the title caught my attention. As an individual who deals with a lot of domestic violence, I have to say this logic is wrong. A citizen does not “have someone arrested”. Although this kind of thinking is common in offenders who enjoy blaming their victims for their own actions, it is incorrect. A citizen gets himself arrested because he violates the law, whether criminal or civil. It is the duty of law abiding citizens to report crimes, and the duty of the State to arrest or to judge such persons. Thinking a citizen has the power to “have someone arrested” is just not correct.When should you forgive someone and let it go, and when should you turn someone in to the police, assuming that the crime committed only affects you and the person who did the act?
Right you are. And the duty of the citizen who called in the complaint is to be a witness in court.I don’t usually post in this part of the forum, but the thinking error in the title caught my attention. As an individual who deals with a lot of domestic violence, I have to say this logic is wrong. A citizen does not “have someone arrested”. Although this kind of thinking is common in offenders who enjoy blaming their victims for their own actions, it is incorrect. A citizen gets himself arrested because he violates the law, whether criminal or civil. It is the duty of law abiding citizens to report crimes, and the duty of the State to arrest or to judge such persons. Thinking a citizen has the power to “have someone arrested” is just not correct.
I think it is so hard for me to give comment for that after i read your story.Originally Posted by PeteZaHut
When should you forgive someone and let it go, and when should you turn someone in to the police, assuming that the crime committed only affects you and the person who did the act?
I will offer some guidelines for you on this matter. It may have been an adolescent phase, but the majority of young people who engage in this inappropriate behavior are early victims themselves. This behavior is learned. If there is any chance that the individual could be around children, or possibly engaging in the same behavior, then it would be prudent to report it. The citizen is not the one who needs to substantiate the claim, but the children’s protective services. You have no way of knowing how many other complaints may have been made, but if everyone reports, a pattern begins to emerge. On the other hand, if the indidual corrected his ways, then the investigation will be dropped. No harm, no foul.This is an awkward situation to bring up online.
When a was pretty little (I’m guessing 7-10 years old), me and 2 other kids were being babysat for the night. The babysitter, an older male, who I am pretty sure was a teenager at the time, convinced us to play strip poker with him.
Being the age that I was, I didn’t fully realize the wrong that had happened. It being about 10 years later now, I would hope that he would have time to mature and realize that isn’t the kind of thing you should do. I would also hope that he was going through a stage of changes in his life that had him confused.
I would assume this isn’t the kind of thing I can, or even should report, considering the time that has passed and the fact that I am only 99% sure who this person was.
How would you go about doing that, considering I am not 100% sure who the person was and it happening so long ago.it would be prudent to report it.
Forgiving someone does not require that you thwart justice. Justice is from God as well as mercy. The courts will decide on the balance of mercy and justice. If a serious crime has been committed, you are obligated to report it to the authorities.When should you forgive someone and let it go, and when should you turn someone in to the police, assuming that the crime committed only affects you and the person who did the act?