Actual grace is His call.
Actual grace is the gift/grace of God which “calls” us to Him.
So…actual grace describes an act of God, namely His call?
True. The recipients of this letter are the “assumed” elect
Is this meant to imply that they couldn’t actually know they were elect? Why wouldn’t you be able to know that?
who individually have received sanctifying grace (justification) through Baptism
I would be more likely to talk about baptism of the Holy Spirit. Jesus said that’s why He came, and that’s what made His ministry different from John’s.
Good answers, though. You are quite good at presenting Catholic teaching.
Every person ever born is given actual grace because God desires for everyone to be saved and Jesus died as a ransom for all mankind.
This is what I would disagree with. I do agree that God desires for everyone to be saved, but I don’t think it follows that every person is capable of desiring God. Romans 9 is the traditional chapter of choice on this point.
[SIGN]What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means! For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy. [/SIGN]Editorial comment: Or not have mercy. That’s also an option that is exercised.
[SIGN]For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills. [/SIGN]Like Pharaoh. Was he the lone exception to the “every person ever born is given actual grace” rule?
Really, I’m serious.
[SIGN]You will say to me then, “Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?” But who are you, O man, to answer back to God?[/SIGN]My guess: An incompatibilist who insists on synergistic regeneration.
[SIGN]Will what is molded say to its molder, “Why have you made me like this?” Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?[/SIGN]Implied answer: An unequivocal “yes.”
[SIGN]What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, (These are people, not actual pottery) in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory— even us whom he has called, (You said something about God’s call? There it is!) not from the Jews only but also from the Gentiles?[/SIGN]
Yes indeed, what if God
did do that? Would that be a problem? Paul doesn’t seem to think so. He anticipates the predictable objection to this perceived injustice and does not validate it- quite the opposite, actually.
(We individuals are also not first justified by works of righteousness in the New Covenant because only Jesus could and did atone for Adam’s Sin which is what alienated mankind and us individually from God in the first place.
“First justified?” How many are there? It sounds like you’re saying Jesus handles the first one all on His own but you’re more or less on the hook for the second one. But, of course, it’s only because of Jesus that you can even be on the hook for your final justification. And while you will say God, to a limited extent, is responsible for your achievement of final justification, you still have some kind of problem with the idea that God chose some to be vessels of mercy and others to be objects of wrath- and it’s possible for you to know which is you before you die.
This is why we were first justified/saved by faith in Christ and His grace alone through Baptism.
Baptism of the Holy Spirit, yes? It’s not about getting your hair wet- it’s about being indwelt by the Holy Spirit. Whether you think it’s a permanent indwelling or not is neither here not there; this is the baptism you’re talking about, yes?
In case you’re wondering, I have been baptized with water. I was not indwelt by the Holy Spirit at that time. That baptism was separated from the other baptism by several years. And if that hadn’t happened…which, for many people, is the case…of what use is it to be baptized in water if you’re never baptized with the Holy Spirit?