R
Reuben_J
Guest
Maybe there is a bit of miscommunication. Perhaps I should have mentioned vernacular languages like Japanese or Chinese. Had they became liturgical language if the early Church was in China or Japan, the rest of the world would have to use them in the liturgy. Non Chinese or Japanese speaking people either have to learn the language or use it without knowing what they mean.Well, wasn’t Latin and Coptic local languages when they became Liturgical languages?
My point was ‘liturgical language’ is not practical and therefore the language that is used in the liturgy should be the language that the people speak (local language) instead of Latin or Coptic or Hebrew or Greek. The Church had decided to do that. By all means use Latin, etc, if the people speak those language.