Hebrews 10: 26ff If after receiving the knowledge of the truth...?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bonjovie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bonjovie

Guest
As the title implies, I’m concerned about this statement of St. Paul’s in Hebrews 10: 26ff. If the sacrifice for our sins is offered only once and after that we face a fearful prospect of judgement if we sin again, how come sacrament of confession?
 
Hi Bonjovie,

II you read the whole thing, you’ll realize that there is no question here of simply sinning, but of apostasy : trampling on the Son of God! You may find another passage clearer. In 6,4ff, it talks of “crucifying again the Son of God” and “reviling Him”.

The first Christians lived wilth the constant pressure of a pagan society and apostasy was an everyday temptation. Of course the grace of God is all-powerful, but it is difficult to conceive of a sincere return to the faith after apostasy.

What do you think?

Verbum
 
As the title implies, I’m concerned about this statement of St. Paul’s in Hebrews 10: 26ff. If the sacrifice for our sins is offered only once and after that we face a fearful prospect of judgement if we sin again, how come sacrament of confession?
D-R Bible, Haydock Commentary:

Ver. 26. If we sin wilfully. He speaks of the sin of wilful apostacy from the known truth; after which, as we cannot be baptized again, we cannot expect to have that abundant remission of sins, which Christ purchased by his death, applied to our souls in that ample manner as it is in baptism; but we have rather all manner of reason to look for a dreadful judgment; the more, because apostates from the known truth seldom or never have the grace to return to it. (Challoner)
 
If this is all true, then the priest lied to me in “sacrament of reconciliation”, and the experiences of the grace of God in my life were mistaken, and probably just wishful thinking on my part, or coincidence. May as well abandon my elderly parents and go back to a full time life of sin! 😦
 
Here is the comments from Fr. William Most
Commentators on the first verse here tend to think the author
speaks of apostasy, as in Hebrews 6. 6 above. But the case is
different here. Here he speaks merely of sins committed
“deliberately”. That is Hebrew be yad ramah, the kind of sin not
covered by the Day of Atonement, of which he has spoken so much.
He says that no sacrifice is left for them: Christ has died, but
they have not heeded. One who violated the law of Moses was to die:
how much more severe should be the penalty of him who has trampled
the Son of God underfoot and treats His covenant blood as nothing?
But if we put this into the background of the Day of Atonement of
which, as we said, the author has been speaking so much, the matter
is clear: Here the case is any sin committed be yad ramah, with a
high hand in contrast to sins of ignorance. Apostasy is not the
only thing.
How then can the author speak so strongly? Because even one mortal
sin was enough to call for the death of Christ. In fact, in
Galatians 2. 20, Paul wrote that He,“loved me, and gave Himself for
me.” Vatican II, Church in Modern World #22 explained: “Each one of
us can say with the Apostle: The Son of God loved me, and gave
Himself for me.”
So in this sense Hebrews can speak of trampling under foot the Son
of God and the covenant blood. It would call for another death of
Christ (cf.“crucifying again” in 6. 6).
Does he mean that ordinary mortal sins cannot be forgiven at all?
Of course not. Protestant commentators are inclined to think one
has only to ask God privately to forgive, and it is done. They
ignore the fact that Christ Himself, on His very first visit to the
Apostles after His resurrection, in John 20, told the Apostles;
“Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them.” He said
that after completing His once-for-all sacrifice. And no
contradiction. That once-for-all sacrifice earned all forgiveness:
there was still the process of giving it out. He Himself spoke of
that in John 20. To ignore that and say in effect; I do not care
what method you want - just forgive me my way – that would be much
like scorning the Son of God of which Hebrews has just spoken.
We have just shown how the vehement language of 10;26ff can be
understood. Further light comes from looking at the practice of the
early Church. The famous Shepherd by Hermas has language which many
commentators think is a psychological ploy. In Mandate 4. 3. 1-6
Hermas tells the Angel of Repentance: “I have heard sir… that
there is no second repentance except the one when we went down into
the water and obtained remission of our former sins.” The angel
replied: “You have heard well, for it is so. The one who has
received remission of sin should never sin again, but live in
purity.”
But right after that, the Angel explains: “After that first and
solemn calling, if a man should be tempted by the devil and sin, he
has one repentance.” So there is another means of forgiveness. Then
come more mysterious words: “But if he sins repeatedly and repents
it is useless for such a man.”
It is obvious that we are dealing, as we said, with a psychological
ploy. For to first say flatly: There is no other means of
forgiveness, and then right away to add another, is nothing but a
move to deter people from breaking the baptismal “seal”- for in the
first age Baptism was often spoken of as a seal: it marks us as
God’s property, we must never break the seal by sinning again.
Yet in Parable 9. 26, speaking even of the great sin of apostasy –
which Hebrews 6. 4 seemed to say could not be forgiven -we find:
“It is impossible for him who now denies his Lord to be saved, but
for whose who denied long ago, repentance seems to be present.”
The explanation is the same as that which we gave in our comments
on Hebrews 6. 4: the person is hardened, and so even though God is
always willing to forgive, and even though the merits of Christ
have earned forgiveness for every sin, yet the man has made himself
unable to take in the forgiveness. Clearly the merit and
satisfaction of Christ is infinite in worth: so on the part of God
there is always forgiveness. But - and here is th explanation of
the above words from Parable 9. 26 – if he goes through years of
canonical penance such as was given in those days, the hardness may
be broken, so that he really repents, really has a change of heart.
Then forgiveness is possible.
Similarly we would explain the words we saw above of the angel
saying that if a man sins repeatedly, there is no forgiveness. This
does not mean that this Sacrament of Penance could be received only
once in a lifetime - it means that repetition of sin brings
hardness. Yet even that hardness could be dissolved by long hard
years of penance, as we have just said.
The very severe Tertullian, before becoming a heretical Montanist,
c, 200-206, though he thought there was Penance only once after
baptism, yet wrote (De paenitentia 4) “For all sins, whether of the
flesh or of the spirit, whether committed in act or [only] in the
will, He who destined punishment by judgment, also promised pardon
by penance.”
We gather that the Sacrament could be used for things less than the
big three: murder, adultery, apostasy. In fact, Tertullian speaks
of merely internal sins,“of the spirit” or only “in the will”…
 
continue…
Somewhat later, about 213-23, when he had already joined the
Montanist heresy, the same Tertullian, in De pudicitia seems to
imply confession more than just once for smaller faults (18. 3):
“But if the clemency of God is open yet to those who are ignorant
[of Him] and infidels, surely also penitence invites clemency to
itself, that kind of penitence being still on hand after believing
[after Baptism] which can obtain pardon for the [relatively] lesser
faults from the bishop, for greater and unforgivable ones, from God
alone.” He continues in 19. 24-26: “For to whom does it not happen
that he is unjustly angry, and is angry beyond the setting of the
sun, or that he lays violent hands [on someone] or that he easily
curses or swears rashly… or that he lies out of shame or
necessity, in businesses, in duties, in making money, in manner of
living, in looking, in hearing - what great temptations! So that if
there be no pardon for these things, salvation would be open to no
one.”
Not many years later, in about 250, St. Cyprian of Carthage, in
Epistle 10 (16) complained of laxity: “Whereas in the case of
lesser sins, sinners do penance for the fixed time and… come to
confession, and through the imposition of the hands of bishop and
clergy receive the right of communion, [now] while the … time of
persecution still lasts… they are admitted to communion… though
penance has not yet been done, nor confession made, and though the
hand of the bishop and clergy has not yet been imposed on them, the
Eucharist is given to them.”
Again, we gather that the Sacrament of Penance was used even for
lesser sins.
 
Here are comments from St. Thomas Aquinas
He says, therefore: For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sin. This is explained in two ways: in one way according to a Gloss, which seems to make a distinction between willing sinners and sinning voluntarily, so that the willing sinner is one who is led by passion to consent to sin, about which he did not think beforehand; but the one who sins voluntarily does so from certain malice, because his will is so prone to sin that he yields at once: ‘They are all turned to their own course, as a horse rushing to battle’ (Jer. 8:6), and does not repent afterwards: ‘They are glad when they have done evil’ (Pr. 2:14). Therefore, they sin deliberately, i.e., continue in the will to sin. And he continues exaggeratingly, after receiving the knowledge of the truth: ‘It is better for them not to have known the way of justice, than after they have known it, to turn back’ (2 Pt 2:21), ‘there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins’, i.e., the sacrifice which Christ offered for the remission of sins does not profit them, because those who repent have their sins forgiven: ‘This is the blood of the new testament, which will be shed for you’ (Mt. 25:28), i.e., efficaciously, but of the wicked it is said: ‘I have labored in vain, I have spent my strength without cause and in vain’ (Is. 41:11); ‘The founder has melted in vain, for their wicked deeds are not consumed’ (Jer. 6:29).
But it is better to say, in keeping with the Apostle’s aim, that according to Augustine, free will has many states: because in the state outside of grace, before that state is repaired by grace, it is not in our power to sin and not to sin mortally: and this, because of the preconceived end and the habit inclining. This is true for a long time, but if one acts from premeditation, he can avoid this sin or that for a while. But after man has been repaired by grace, it is entirely within his power to avoid mortal sin and even venial sin in particular, but not altogether in general; and this is due to the help of sanctifying grace. Therefore, he says, for if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, i.e., after receiving grace, by which the knowledge of sin is possessed: because before the knowledge of sin, our sin is not imputed to us. But afterwards, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, because before the reparation, which was accomplished by Christ, that sacrifice which was awaited was left, but now His death is no longer awaited; so, too, after baptism, no further baptism is awaited.
Then when he says, but a fearful prospect of judgment, he frightens them with the expectation of God’s judgment, in regard to which he does two things: first, he frightens them; secondly, he gives a reason (v. 28).
Thus, therefore, it has been stated that no further sacrifice is left. What then? That which was stated above in chap. 9, namely, that after death comes the judgment: ‘Know that there is a judgment’ (Jb. 19:29). The expectation of that judgment is dreadful both because of the consciousness of sins: ‘We all offend in many ways’ (Jas. 3:2) and because of the imperfection of our justices: ‘All our justices are as the rag of a menstruous woman’ (Is. 64:6); ‘I am afraid of your judgments’ (Ps. 118:120); ‘I have heard and my bowels were troubled’ (Hab. 3:16). This expectation is also distressing; hence, he says, and a fury of fire, i.e., the punishment by fire, which is inflicted by the jealous zeal of divine justice: ‘I am the Lord, you God, mighty, jealous’ (Ex. 20:5). But zeal is a spouse’s love. Therefore, just as a husband does not spare a wicked wife, so neither God a sinful soul: ‘The jealousy and rage of the husband will not spare in the day of judgment’ (Pr. 6:34). He continues, which will consume the adversaries: ‘A fire shall go before him and shall burn his enemies round about’ (Ps. 96:3), because the fire, which will go before the face of the judge, will burn the bodies of living things and will cast the reprobate into hell and consume their bodies, not by totally consuming them but by torturing them forever.
 
Here are the comments from St. John Chrysostom
Trees which have been planted, and have had the advantage of all other care, and the hands and the labors of the cultivator, and yet yield no return for the labors, are pulled up by the roots, and handed over to the fire. So somewhat of this kind takes place also in the case of our Illumination. For when Christ has planted us, and we have enjoyed the watering of the Spirit, and then show no fruit; fire, even that of Hell, awaits us, and flame unquenchable.
Paul therefore having exhorted them to love and to bringing forth the fruit of good works, and having urged them from the kindlier [considerations] (What are these? That we have an entrance into the holy of holies, the new way which He has inaugurated for us. Hebrews 10:20), does the same again from the more gloomy ones, speaking thus. For having said, not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is, but exhorting one another, and so much the more, as you see the day approaching Hebrews 10:25, this being sufficient for consolation, he added, For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth. There is need, he means, of good works, yea, very great need, For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remains no more sacrifice for sins. You were cleansed; you were set free from the charges against you, you have become a son. If then thou return to your former vomit, there awaits you on the other hand excommunication and fire and whatever such things there are. For there is no second sacrifice.
At this place we are again assailed by those who take away repentance, and by those who delay to come to baptism. The one saying, that it is not safe for them to come to baptism, since there is no second remission: And the other asserting that it is not safe to impart the mysteries to those who have sinned, if there is no second remission.
What shall we say then to them both? That he does not take away repentance, nor the propitiation through repentance, nor does he thrust away and cast down with despair the fallen. He is not thus an enemy of our salvation; but what? He takes away the second Washing. For he did not say, no more is there repentance, or no more is there remission, but no more is there a sacrifice, that is, there is no more a second Cross. For this is what he means by sacrifice. For by one sacrifice, he says, He has perfected forever them that are sanctified Hebrews 10:14; not like the Jewish [rites.]. For this reason he has treated so much throughout concerning the Sacrifice, that it is one, even one; not wishing to show this only, that herein it differed from the Jewish [rites], but also to make [men] more steadfast, so that they might no longer expect another sacrifice according to the Jewish law.
For, says he, if we sin willfully. See how he is disposed to pardon. He says, if we sin willfully, so that there is pardon for those [who sin] not willfully. After the knowledge of the truth: He either means, of Christ, or of all doctrines. There remains no more sacrifice for sins, but what? A certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation which shall devour the adversaries. By Adversaries he means not the unbelievers, but those also who do what is against virtue; or [else he means] that the same fire shall receive them of the household also, which [receives] the adversaries. Then expressing its devouring nature, he says, as if giving it life, fiery indignation which shall devour the adversaries. For as a wild beast when irritated and very fierce and savage, would not rest till it could lay hold on some one and eat him up; so also that fire, like one goaded by indignation, whatever it can lay hold of does not let go, but devours and tears it to pieces.
 
Here are some comments from John Henry Cardinal Newman
That they who sin fall into a hopeless state,—that is hopeless while they continue in it, so that they can only gain hope by leaving it,—is shown more forcibly still in St. Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews. For instance, the inspired writer says, “If we sin wilfully, after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour” or eat “the adversaries.” [Heb. x. 27.] Here it is expressly said that wilful sin against knowledge does not leave us as it found us. We cannot receive pardon {191} as we received it at the first, freely and instantly, merely on faith, we are thrown out of grace; and though our prospects are not at once hopeless, yet our state is hopeless, tends to perdition, nay, in itself, is perdition, one in which, while we are in it, we are lost. Hence all through this Epistle St. Paul, equally with St. John, speaks of but two states, a state of grace and glory in the heavenly Jerusalem, a communion with God, Christ, Angels, saints departed, saints on earth; and, on the other hand, a state of wrath; and he warns his brethren that they cannot sin without falling into the state of wrath. “We are not of them that draw back unto perdition, but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.” [Heb. x. 39.] He does not speak of sin and sinners tenderly; he does not merely say, “If you sin, you are an evidence of human frailty; you are inconsistent; you ought to keep from sin from gratitude; you should be deeply humbled at your sins; you should betake yourselves to the atonement of Christ if you sin.” All this is true, but it would be short of the real state of the case; and St. Paul, therefore, says much more: “If you sin wilfully, you throw yourselves out of God’s kingdom; you by the very act disinherit yourselves, you bring yourselves into a dreadful region;” and he leaves it to them to draw the inference what they ought to do to get back again. He urges against them “the terrors of the Lord.” He bids them not deceive themselves, for sinners have no inheritance in the kingdom. Accordingly he warns them “to look diligently, lest any man come short of the grace of God;” and to “fear, lest a promise {192} being left us of entering into His rest, any of them should seem to come short of it.” [Heb. xii. 15; iv. 1.]
Such is the new state of “righteousness and true holiness,” in which Christians are created, and such is the state of those who draw back from it; and if any one asks whether St. Paul does not say that “by faith we stand?” I answer, as I have already answered, that doubtless faith does keep us in a state of grace, and is the means of blotting out for us those sins which we commit in it. But what are those sins which we do commit? Sins of infirmity;—all other sins faith itself excludes. If we do commit greater sins, we have not faith. Faith we cannot use to blot out the greater sins, for faith we have not at all, if we commit such. That faith which has not power over our hearts to keep us from transgressing, has not power with God to keep Him from punishing…
 
continue…
To conclude. This is our state:—Christ has healed each of us, and has said to us, “See thou sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee.” [John v. 14.] If we commit sin, we fall,—not at once back again into the unredeemed and lost world; no, but at least we fall out of the kingdom, though for a while we may linger on the skirts of the kingdom. We fall into what will in the event lead us back into the lost world, or rather into what is worse, unless we turn heavenward, and extricate ourselves from our fearful state as speedily as we can. We come into what may be called the passage or vestibule of hell; a place full of those unclean spirits who “seek rest and find none,” and rejoice in getting possession {193} of souls, from which they were once cast out. We are no longer in the light of God’s countenance, and though (blessed be His Name) doubtless we can through His help get back into it, yet we have to get back into it;—and then the whole subject becomes an anxious and serious one. Yes, it is indeed very serious, considering how the common run of Christians go on. If wilful sin throws us out of a state of grace, and if men do sin wilfully, and then forget that they have done so, and years pass away, and they merely smooth over what has happened by forgetting it, and assume that they are still in a state of grace, making no efforts by true repentance to be put into it again, only assuming that they are in it; and then go about their duties as Christians, just as if they were still God’s children in the sense in which Baptism made them, and were not presumptuously intruding without leave, and not by the door, into a house whence they have been sent out; and if they so live and so die, what are we to say about them? Alas! what a dreadful thought it is, that there may be numbers outwardly in the Christian Church, nay, who at present are in a certain sense religious men, who, nevertheless, have no principle of growth in them, because they have sinned, and never duly repented. They may be under a disability for past sins, which they have never been at the pains to remove, or to attempt to remove. Alas! to think that they do not know their state at all and esteem themselves in the unreserved enjoyment of God’s favour, when, after all, their religion is for the most part but the reflection from without upon their surface, not a light within them, or at least but the remains of grace {194} once given. O dreadful thought, if we are in the number! O most dreadful thought, if an account lies against us in God’s books, which we have never manfully encountered, never inquired into, never even prayed against, only and simply forgotten; which we leave to itself to be settled as it may; and if at any time some sudden memory of it comes across us, we think of it without fear, as if what has gone out of our minds had been forgotten of God also!—or even, as the way of some is, if when we recollect any former sins of whatever kind, we palliate them, give them soft names, make excuses, saying they were done in youth or under great temptation, or cannot be helped now, or have been forsaken. May God give us all grace ever to think of these things; to reflect on the brightness of that state in which God once placed us, its purity, its sweetness, its radiance, its beauty, its majesty, its glory: and to think, in contrast of the wretchedness and filthiness of that load of sin, with which our own wilfulness has burdened us: and to pray Him to show us how to unburden ourselves,—how to secure to ourselves again those gifts which, for what we know, we have forfeited.
 
If this is all true, then the priest lied to me in “sacrament of reconciliation”, and the experiences of the grace of God in my life were mistaken, and probably just wishful thinking on my part, or coincidence. May as well abandon my elderly parents and go back to a full time life of sin! 😦
The assumption is that one remains in “apostasy”. Actually, I don’t think it has to go as far as “apostasy”, but merely remaining in mortal sin and not attending the Sacraments (including the Mass). Read on to Heb 10:25-31.

Sincerely,

De Maria
 
Hebrews 10: 26ff If after receiving the knowledge of the truth…? As the title implies, I’m concerned about this statement of St. Paul’s in Hebrews 10: 26ff. If the sacrifice for our sins is offered only once and after that we face a fearful prospect of judgement if we sin again, how come sacrament of confession?
**Hebrews 10:
25Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.

26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,**

In my opinion, this is in context of the Mass. If we willfully do not go to Mass, we incur a mortal sin, do we not?

Yes. Have you ever wondered why? Read v. 29

27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

28He that despised Moses’ law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:

** 29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?**

30For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.

31It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Obviously, to me anyway, anyone who treats the Mass with the cavalier attitude that he can attend when he wants and miss when he wants, especially as those who will stay home to watch football and other trivial matters. They are essentially treating the Sacrifice of our Lord as a mean and unworthy thing. They have walked all over Him and don’t understand their faith. The Sacrifice of the Eucharist is wasted upon them:
1 Corinthians 11:27-29
King James Version (KJV)
27Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

28But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.

29For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.

As for the Sacrament of Confession, all the Sacraments are the same. They all require faith. Believing in and desiring the power of God to heal the soul. Anyone who treats the Sacrament of the Mass and the Eucharist with disdain, will also treat the Sacrament of Confession the same.

Unless that person has a true repentance and changes from the heart, let him beware.
31It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Sincerely,

De Maria
 
Not really! 😊
Ok. I’ll just leave you with this thought. The Mass is valid. It is the Christian Passover.

1 Corinthians 5:7
Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top