hello again

[jersen05]

answering-christianity.com/john10_30.htm

the link above explains the divinity of jesus. their explanation is somewhat clear to me. and the only resort that catholic will use is the tradition.

any explanation about this?

 

[CB_Catholic]

answering-christianity.com/john10_30.htm

the link above explains the divinity of jesus. their explanation is somewhat clear to me. and the only resort that catholic will use is the tradition.

any explanation about this?

You expect a Muslim to correctly interpret the NT for Christianity? That question was debated and settled long before Mohammed was born and Islam was established by people far more learned in the matter than him, and who were guided by the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth. He is coming from the perspective that Jesus was not God, and selecting and interpreting texts to fit his own ideas.

Do you really understand what Sacred Tradition is?

 

[NotWorthy]

answering-christianity.com/john10_30.htm

the link above explains the divinity of jesus. their explanation is somewhat clear to me. and the only resort that catholic will use is the tradition.

any explanation about this?

Ok, so the guy says that the Bible is nothing but an exaggeration. Hence, anything Scriptural you reply with would be lumped (by him) into the “simple exaggeration” department.

So, what are you left with? Sacred Tradition.

I find it ironic that a Muslim defender will trash the Bible. If you studied the development of the Kuran, you would find his techniques (this Muslim apologist) rather hypocritical.