S
svid2
Guest
Pax Christi!Does this have anything to do with Deism?
My guess is, no.
God bless.
Pax Christi!Does this have anything to do with Deism?
Isn’t a deist God insignificant since it doesn’t care about human affairs? Why wouldn’t it/he/she tell us what is right and wrong like the Abrahamic God?
The Creator is hardly insignificant, after all it is the being responsible for creating the entire universe you an me included. And who said that the Creator doesn’t care about human affairs? The Creator could be obsessing about every single detail of its creation but has chosen to not actively interfere with it. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t care. As for right and wrong, it does. It tells us what is morally good and bad through our reason and conscience.Deism is ultimately a form of nihilism, for it does not guarantee (1) free will and (2) eternal life. There is no reason to care about deism.
Well, Mark agitated me. When I remembered my daughter, my eye opened. BANG. Spark, and explosion. They call it the big bang.
Pre-existence. The time and place before the universe exploded into existence. Also called nothing, or nothingness. It’s a permanent temporary place. I’m the container.
The explosion is caused by an extremely intense urgency to protect (my daughter). Her name is EmmaGrace. Emma means Universal. And you know what Grace means.
I am quite sorry but I have no idea what you’re saying. If you have a question feel free to ask!It’s a big universe and a big planet and a big world. God is a word.
This is actually a fantastic question and once again I have to say it depends on the background of the deist in question. Deists who come from a more secular background (Atheists, Agnostics, etc.) tend not to while those who come from other faiths still enjoy this particular ritual .Raised in a Christian church I always enjoyed prayer as a form of meditation and a way to give thanks, a habit I continue doing now I am a deist. Granted, the form of the prayer has changed. I went from asking God for things to thanking God for things. When I pray I don’t ask God for forgiveness or to heal my family, I thank God for creating this universe and for making my family.When I was considering Deism. I struggled with whether a deist should pray or not. So do you as a deist pray?
Then would you mind responding to my Post Nos. 5 and 8?I am quite enjoying being able to discuss these things with you all! Please don’t stop!!!
I just want to raise an objection against the statement in bold. Would this not violate the Principle of Proportionate Causality? That is the cause has to be somewhat like the effect in that it has to have the power to produce the effect; so whilst we can not say what God is univocally, it certainly seems that analogous predication would be valid. This then would lead us down a Classical Theistic line, rather than a deistic.
- Deist believe there is a single Creator (termed God for convenience)
- God created the universe and all contained withing but has chosen to not interfere with it.
- This belief is based on reason and the observation of the complexity of nature and the universe.
- God is wholly incomprehensible to humans and it is futile to try and understand it due to the limitations of the human mind.
- God gave humans reason in order to develop our own morals and ethics.
- God created the universe and all contained withing but has chosen to not interfere with it.
And all this time I thought God was behind it.You understand a thing called “the big bang” in a “scientific” way. I know it from experience because I’m part of the process of “the big bang”. It’s my eye (vision) that makes it happen.
Before creation there was God; Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Consciousness does not exist in a vacuum. I think you need to lay off of the New Age stuff.In the time and place of pre-existence, there is no universe. No galaxies, no stars. Nothing. But there is consciousness. Consciousness always exists and is not dependent on human beings, brains or even planet Earth.
I have no questions for you, I’ve informed you. If you want to know and understand the origin of the universe, and the so-called creators, then you should know the most important piece of it: nothing (also called nothingness, pre-existence).I am quite sorry but I have no idea what you’re saying. If you have a question feel free to ask!
God is a word.And all this time I thought God was behind it.
Before creation there was God; Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Consciousness does not exist in a vacuum. I think you need to lay off of the New Age stuff.
I believe I already have responded to all your questions? I addressed my credentials in Post 9 as well as your second question! But I’ll go ahead and answer them again!Then would you mind responding to my Post Nos. 5 and 8?
Thanks.
That is my fault lol I didn’t make myself clear in that statement. In the 4th statement I made I stated that “God is wholly incomprehensible to humans and it is futile to try and understand it due to the limitations of the human mind.” When perhaps a better wording would have been “God is incomprehensible as a whole to humans and it is futile to try and understand it as such do to the limitation of the human mind.” I hope that makes more sense? Deists don’t try to understand God directly but through understanding the Universe itself. Think of it as interpreting a piece of art, in the moment that it is fully understood we are given a small glimpse into the mind of the artist.I just want to raise an objection against the statement in bold. Would this not violate the Principle of Proportionate Causality? That is the cause has to be somewhat like the effect in that it has to have the power to produce the effect; so whilst we can not say what God is unequivocally, it certainly seems that analogous predication would be valid. This then would lead us down a Classical Theistic line, rather than a deistic
You did say ‘ask me anything’…
Favorite football team?
Do you believe in predestination? There were a lot of elitists among the early deists, so I must ask if there is any sort of feeling that some people are just not going to do well and are ‘lesser’ than others. How responsible do you feel towards helping the poor and do you think people can ‘change their fate’? Without free will, is it even possible to change your prospects in your religion?
Forgive me if someone already asked, but many of the FFs that were deists still belonged to various churches, such as Methodist, Episcopal, etc… Is deism a religion with pastors and churches, or a philosophical view?
Quite a few questions rolled up in this one but I’ll do my best to answer them all! First off, I’m not a big football fans so I’m going to pretend you’re using the European version and go with Manchester United!(formerly “lutheran farmer”)
How can a religion (if that term can be applied to Deism) which claims that God does not interfere with the world have its roots in a religion whose central claim is that God became man and died to save us from our sins?Deism, after all, has its root in Christianity.
I know it sounds contradictory but I promise its true! A better wording would probably have been modern deism (17 Century forward) has its roots in Christianity. Deism has been around since the time of the Ancient Greeks. Almost all of the earliest modern deists and those considered the most influential were originally Christian. During the Enlightenment these Christians had a hard time reconciling the difference between what the Catholic Church said was fact and what Science said was fact. In order to reconcile this difference they separated from the church and revived a declining school of thought. Since it is impossible for a person to completely disconnect themselves from the past, these founders of Deism carried over some of their past religions beliefs. The most common belief passed on is that of monotheistic view point of God. These people also brought with them certain beliefs about love and a persons involvement with the world.How can a religion (if that term can be applied to Deism) which claims that God does not interfere with the world have its roots in a religion whose central claim is that God became man and died to save us from our sins?
Do all/most Deists believe that God absolutely never interferes in any way with the world He has created?
Using the reason that G-d gave you and the rest of us, why do you suppose He would have created the universe and simultaneously chosen not to get involved? And do you believe G-d knows everything that has happened and will happen in the universe (is G-d omniscient and extra-temporal)?A complex question in the guise of a simple one lol
Truth be told one cannot be a “practicing” deist the way one can be a “practicing” catholic because there is simply nothing to practice. Deism is less of a religion and more of a belief system and because of this there are no rituals or ceromonies that are universal among deists. A person is general held to be a deist if they subscribe to the majority of the basic tenets that make up the core beliefs of Deism. I say majority because there is no official creed or set of beliefs, merely beliefs that you will find almost always. Those beliefs are as follows.
If you believe those 4 basic principles then you are termed a deist! Of course there are as many different beliefs among deists as there are deists so there are things I believe that others don’t and vice verse.
- Deist believe there is a single Creator (termed God for convenience)
- God created the universe and all contained withing but has chosen to not interfere with it.
- This belief is based on reason and the observation of the complexity of nature and the universe.
- God is wholly incomprehensible to humans and it is futile to try and understand it due to the limitations of the human mind.
- God gave humans reason in order to develop our own morals and ethics.
- God created the universe and all contained withing but has chosen to not interfere with it.
Oh I have absolutely no idea why and really even couldn’t decide where to begin lol I view God as a transpersonal being so any attempt I could make to understand the Creator directly would inherently be doomed to failure. I hope one day I might have answer to that question but my understanding of the universe is way too low to even try to being to understand. Ask me again right before I die and I may be able to give your the beginning to an answer lolUsing the reason that G-d gave you and the rest of us, why do you suppose He would have created the universe and then choose not to get involved?
Philosophically the problem with this is that the universe and its inhabitants are not manifestly perfect nor unbroken.Yes they do! There are some who believe that God has interfered in key points where a part in his machine has rusted or broken (to continue the metaphor for the Universe as a machine). But most reject this premise on the fact that the Universe was the direct creation of a perfect being and as such is perfect. Therefore, no part would rust or break.
Except that you do profess to know enough about Him to know that He is a transpersonal Being and that you cannot understand. So you, at least, do not believe that concept is a failure.Oh I have absolutely no idea why and really even couldn’t decide where to begin lol I view God as a transpersonal being so any attempt I could make to understand the Creator directly would inherently be doomed to failure.
According to the understanding we have now. Whose to say that what we perceive to be imperfect or broken is merely a limitation on our understanding of the universe. What if the universe is perfect but because we do not fully understand it we cannot see it as such.Philosophically the problem with this is that the universe and its inhabitants are not manifestly perfect nor unbroken.
Aside from a subconscious understanding that things are not as they should be, if everything was “perfect,” then we would know that it is perfect because our understanding would not be limited by imperfection.According to the understanding we have now. Whose to say that what we perceive to be imperfect or broken is merely a limitation on our understanding of the universe. What if the universe is perfect but because we do not fully understand it we cannot see it as such.
What scientific facts did they believe to be contradictory to the Catholic faith, and why did a scientific disagreement lead to such a substantial change in their beliefs about metaphysics?During the Enlightenment these Christians had a hard time reconciling the difference between what the Catholic Church said was fact and what Science said was fact. In order to reconcile this difference they separated from the church and revived a declining school of thought.